Fudo PAM vs IBM Security Secret Server comparison

IBM Security Secret Server and Fudo PAM compete in privileged access management. Fudo PAM holds the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, offering advanced security capabilities users find valuable.

Features: IBM Security Secret Server is noted for automation capabilities, integration with third-party applications, and cost-effectiveness. Fudo PAM offers advanced session monitoring, user behavior analytics, and a more robust feature set, which enhances security management.

Room for Improvement: IBM Security Secret Server users often seek better customization, enhanced reporting capabilities, and a reduction in hidden setup costs. Fudo PAM users point to the need for improved scalability, more extensive third-party integrations, and a less steep learning curve during deployment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Security Secret Server offers straightforward deployment but can be slow with issue resolution. Fudo PAM, despite its steep initial learning curve, provides reliable and supportive customer service throughout the deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Security Secret Server is considered cost-effective with concerns about hidden setup costs impacting ROI. Fudo PAM, although associated with higher upfront costs, is valued for long-term security benefits and offers satisfactory ROI, justifying initial investment through its comprehensive capabilities.