Fudo PAM vs IBM Security Secret Server comparison

Fudo Security and IBM are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Fudo Security is ranked #20, while IBM is ranked #28. Fudo Security holds a 2.8% mindshare in PAM, compared to IBM’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fudo Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Fudo PAM

Read 5 Fudo PAM reviews

1,011 Views
1,001 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Security Secret Server

Read 7 IBM Security Secret Server reviews

452 Views
452 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fudo PAM

IBM Security Secret Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

IBM Security Secret Server and Fudo PAM compete in privileged access management. Fudo PAM holds the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, offering advanced security capabilities users find valuable.

Features: IBM Security Secret Server is noted for automation capabilities, integration with third-party applications, and cost-effectiveness. Fudo PAM offers advanced session monitoring, user behavior analytics, and a more robust feature set, which enhances security management.

Room for Improvement: IBM Security Secret Server users often seek better customization, enhanced reporting capabilities, and a reduction in hidden setup costs. Fudo PAM users point to the need for improved scalability, more extensive third-party integrations, and a less steep learning curve during deployment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Security Secret Server offers straightforward deployment but can be slow with issue resolution. Fudo PAM, despite its steep initial learning curve, provides reliable and supportive customer service throughout the deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Security Secret Server is considered cost-effective with concerns about hidden setup costs impacting ROI. Fudo PAM, although associated with higher upfront costs, is valued for long-term security benefits and offers satisfactory ROI, justifying initial investment through its comprehensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Fudo PAM vs. IBM Security Secret Server Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. IBM Security Secret Server

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fudo PAM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Security Secret Server

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

28th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Fudo PAM is 2.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Security Secret Server is 1.1%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Oleksiy-Zaionchkovskyy

Security Solutions Architect at Netwave

Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization

I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server. Working with 100 or 200 server installations is comfortable, but not thousands. The scalability isn't very good because it's complicated. I would like more organization. For instance, they could add a table that matches an account to many servers at once. There could also be better education services. They don't have any certification program, at least in Ukraine, so the training is complicated and divided into different pieces. Cisco, for example, has a great education program that starts from the basics and progresses to advanced features.

Read full review

AsifIqbal

Chief Information Security Officer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Easy to set up and manage and has good scalability and stability, but its technical support team needs to be more aggressive in solving issues

What needs improvement in IBM Security Secret Server is support. The local partner provides good support, but IBM itself doesn't. Most of the time, the IBM support team does not aggressively resolve issues reported through chat or the IBM website. In the next version of IBM Security Secret Server, I want to see more lightweight recording, architecture, or infrastructure requirements. Currently, it's heavy, so I want it reduced to make adapting IBM Security Secret Server much more effortless.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."

"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."

"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."

"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."

"One of the most valuable features is scalability, and how it allows you to scale it without affecting the underlying core components."

"The live recording is a very useful feature."

"As a PAM solution, Secret Server performs all the use cases in our environment."

"Stability-wise, I think it is a very good solution."

"What I like best about IBM Security Secret Server is its single-access console. It's also easy to manage and fulfills the requirements with the least resistance."

Cons

"The stability is not very good."

"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."

"The configuration is difficult."

"Professional training and certification would be great."

"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."

"It would be preferable if the full proxy was included in the IBM Security Secret Server."

"What needs improvement in IBM Security Secret Server is support. The local partner provides good support, but IBM itself doesn't. Most of the time, the IBM support team does not aggressively resolve issues reported through chat or the IBM website."

"The newer interface is more difficult to use than the previous one, and consequently, new users might need more training."

"The nonclustered index is working in an area with a problem that needs improvement."

"Secret Server should have the ability to discover privileged accounts in the servers, like the administrator or users, from SQL and Oracle without having to import a script."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."

"My rating for the IBM Security Secret Server pricing is seven out of ten. It could be cheaper."

"I believe that we paid 35,000 or 40,000 US dollars for it."

"The price could be better. I think it's a good price for the on-premises environment and the high availability for enterprises the solution provides."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Performing Arts

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 23% of the time

Teleport vs Fudo PAM

Compared 15% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM

Compared 14% of the time

ManageEngine PAM360 vs Fudo PAM

Compared 13% of the time

One Identity Safeguard vs Fudo PAM

Compared 11% of the time

More Fudo PAM Competitors

Delinea Secret Server vs IBM Security Secret Server

Compared 77% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs IBM Security Secret Server

Compared 23% of the time

More IBM Security Secret Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

July 2025

Download Fudo PAM product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Secret Server

August 2025

Download IBM Security Secret Server product report

Also Known As

Fudo Privileged Access Management

IBM Secret Server, Secret Server, IBM Security Privileged Identity Manager

Overview

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Fudo Security

IBM Security Secret Server protects privileged accounts from hackers and insider threats, helps ensure compliance with evolving regulations, and allows authorized employees to seamlessly gain access to the tools and information they need to drive productivity. Easily detect, manage and audit privileged accounts, and control which applications are permitted to run on endpoints and servers to prevent malicious applications from penetrating the environment. IBM Security Secret Server is fast to deploy, easy to use and scalable for the enterprise.

IBM

Sample Customers

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. IBM Security Secret Server

July 2025

Free Report: Fudo PAM vs. IBM Security Secret Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. IBM Security Secret Server and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fudo PAM vs. IBM Security Secret Server report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.