Fudo PAM vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

Fudo Security and One Identity are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Fudo Security is ranked #20, while One Identity is ranked #6 with an average rating of 6.9. Fudo Security holds a 2.9% mindshare in PAM, compared to One Identity’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fudo Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Fudo PAM

Read 5 Fudo PAM reviews

989 Views
979 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Read 45 One Identity Safeguard reviews

3,649 Views
2,408 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Fudo PAM

One Identity Safeguard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

```html

One Identity Safeguard and Fudo PAM are key competitors in the Privileged Access Management market. Fudo PAM is favored for its comprehensive features, which seem to provide greater value in complex environments.

Features: One Identity Safeguard provides robust session monitoring, an efficient workflow system, and competitive pricing. Fudo PAM offers advanced session recording, real-time analytics, and innovative security management features.

Room for Improvement: One Identity Safeguard requires better integration with IT systems, more detailed documentation, and enhancements in user interface. Fudo PAM needs improvements in documentation, training resources, and software stability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard facilitates straightforward deployment with strong technical support. Fudo PAM involves a more complex deployment process but has responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard is cost-effective with favorable ROI from lower setup costs. Fudo PAM, although more expensive initially, offers a higher long-term ROI due to its enhanced security features.

```

To learn more, read our detailed Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,922 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fudo PAM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (9th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Fudo PAM is 2.9%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 3.5%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
One Identity Safeguard	3.5%
Fudo PAM	2.9%
Other	93.6%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Oleksiy-Zaionchkovskyy

Security Solutions Architect at Netwave

Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization

I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server. Working with 100 or 200 server installations is comfortable, but not thousands. The scalability isn't very good because it's complicated. I would like more organization. For instance, they could add a table that matches an account to many servers at once. There could also be better education services. They don't have any certification program, at least in Ukraine, so the training is complicated and divided into different pieces. Cisco, for example, has a great education program that starts from the basics and progresses to advanced features.

Read full review

Tor Nordhagen

Executive Director at Semaphore

Transparent mode for privileged sessions will greatly simplify our client's administrative situation

We're introducing the solution's transparent mode for privileged sessions. This is part of what the client hasn't used before. It will simplify their administrative situation greatly. So far, the rollout of this feature has been a seamless process, but we're still in the midst of rolling it out. The benefits will be on the risk side. Right now, the way accounts are managed, you don't necessarily know who is using an account. There's a shared admin account, and that's not a good thing. And those accounts are shared in wallets by several people. One of the real benefits of safeguarding here is that the client will have an absolute audit of who is using an administrative interface, whether it's server or network.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."

"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."

"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."

"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."

"One of the real benefits of safeguarding here is that the client will have an absolute audit of who is using an administrative interface, whether it's server or network."

"The customer service and technical support are very good."

"The monitoring system is very good."

"There is ease of implementation."

"I like that One Identity Safeguard lets you configure the maximum number of connections to the target, a configuration I didn't find in its competitor."

"The transparent mode for privileged sessions is a very good solution."

"The system is easy to manage, as it is not a system that you will change everything all of a sudden. It evolves most of the time with customer requests."

"We deployed it into our company for controlling a client's behavior in our data center. It is very useful to control their connections, such as RDP."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

Cons

"The stability is not very good."

"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."

"Professional training and certification would be great."

"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."

"The configuration is difficult."

"The main thing that needs improvement is the slowness. Apart from that, the change password check-in feature also needs improvement because it is not working perfectly accurately."

"The interface is better now, but it still could be improved a lot. It needs more organization, menus, automatic refresh of information, and Web 2.0."

"One Identity's support is not appropriately structured, and it has a lot of room to improve."

"I would like to see support for RDP over HTTPS so this product can be used in conjunction with the Microsoft terminal."

"The product uses a lot of resources in current sessions."

"Our experience with technical support has been disappointing. We require more prompt and faster response times. We require answers to our questions right away but we haven't received that level of support."

"There is a lack of documentation and many problems with the plugins."

"Something for One Identity to look at is having integration guidelines for how to logically group accounts."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."

"As compared to other products, it is reasonable, but the training sessions are too expensive."

"It is cheaper than CyberArk. Its price is fair."

"It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody."

"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."

"We bought their other products, so it was not that expensive. It is one of those where the more you buy, the cheaper it is."

"They offer a fair price for a robust solution."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,922 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

20%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about One Identity Safeguard?

The identity discovery is good, and the performance is pretty good value.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

The pricing of One Identity Safeguard is fairly priced and cheaper than other solutions of the same enterprise level. It provides a good cost-benefit ratio.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

There is room for improvement in integration between modules. The native integration between SPP and SPS, which is currently based on a plugin, could be enhanced. Customization for lookup passwords...

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 22% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM

Compared 14% of the time

ManageEngine PAM360 vs Fudo PAM

Compared 12% of the time

Teleport vs Fudo PAM

Compared 12% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Fudo PAM

Compared 8% of the time

More Fudo PAM Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 21% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 10% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 8% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 7% of the time

Saviynt vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 4% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

November 2025

Download Fudo PAM product report

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

October 2025

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Also Known As

Fudo Privileged Access Management

No data available

Overview

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Fudo Security

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sample Customers

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard

September 2025

Free Report: Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard

Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,922 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.