Fudo PAM vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

Fudo Security and One Identity are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Fudo Security is ranked #24, while One Identity is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. Fudo Security holds a 2.4% mindshare in PAM, compared to One Identity’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fudo Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Fudo PAM

Read 5 Fudo PAM reviews

1,442 Views
1,413 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Read 77 One Identity Safeguard reviews

7,550 Views
4,908 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Fudo PAM

One Identity Safeguard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

```html

One Identity Safeguard and Fudo PAM are key competitors in the Privileged Access Management market. Fudo PAM is favored for its comprehensive features, which seem to provide greater value in complex environments.

Features: One Identity Safeguard provides robust session monitoring, an efficient workflow system, and competitive pricing. Fudo PAM offers advanced session recording, real-time analytics, and innovative security management features.

Room for Improvement: One Identity Safeguard requires better integration with IT systems, more detailed documentation, and enhancements in user interface. Fudo PAM needs improvements in documentation, training resources, and software stability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard facilitates straightforward deployment with strong technical support. Fudo PAM involves a more complex deployment process but has responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard is cost-effective with favorable ROI from lower setup costs. Fudo PAM, although more expensive initially, offers a higher long-term ROI due to its enhanced security features.

```

To learn more, read our detailed Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,668 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fudo PAM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

24th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (3rd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Fudo PAM is 2.4%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 4.4%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
One Identity Safeguard	4.4%
Fudo PAM	2.4%
Other	93.2%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Taras Dubrova

BDM at Oberig-it

Works with SCTP, STTPS, SQL, and MySQL protocols

There are some areas for improvement in the Fudo PAM cake that we want to improve in terms of scaling. Scaling is an optional feature because we closed some big projects with enterprise customers from different countries, including Ukraine, Kaloxetine, Uzbekistan, and others. We closed projects in different areas with customers of different sizes. When we talk about enterprise customers, we should consider that they have different use cases and desires for Fudo PAM. We compared our options for customers to choose their vendors, and we discovered Fudo PAM has few scaling options. In Fudo PAM, there should be additional features for scaling and organizing remote sessions for remote systems in remote networks.

Read full review

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Executive at DigitalTrack Solutions Ind Pvt Ltd

Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."

"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."

"I think that Fudo Privileged Access Management is a very good program."

"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."

"This is a solution that I recommend because it is a simple privileged access management system that is done very well."

"Right now we are encouraging our customers to use Fudo PAM because it is the only product in PAM technology that we have to offer them."

"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."

"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

"All the features are promising, but we love the reporting feature because we can get each and every report. That's a major compliance requirement. Its reporting is really amazing, and it has made life a lot easier."

"We use the solution’s “transparent mode” feature for privileged sessions; it is very easy because it is only a simple configuration for our users, we don't have to modify our network, we install it, configure it, and it works, so it is super easy, and the rollout for our users is seamless."

"Technical support is brilliant."

"Using this solution has been a great decision in helping with our tasks."

"The whole product solves the privileged access management challenge for our company. We have a secure tunnel, a secure session manager, and automatic logging of sessions, which is good for forensic purposes. We have a rich level of logs and can trace what happened on which machine and see who did what."

"The extensible framework for authentication is one of the most valuable features. We use an MFA plug-in and a lot of different factors, depending on what the business use-cases are. And of course, the auditing functionality is also valuable."

"But otherwise, I think it is a good product and a good buy."

"Overall, my experience with One Identity Safeguard has been very positive, as it is a reliable and secure privilege access management solution that effectively protects sensitive accounts and provides full visibility into administrator activity, with minor improvements needed in terms of UI and reporting enhancements."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

Cons

"Professional training and certification would be great."

"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."

"The configuration is difficult."

"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."

"To tell you the truth, I find that Fudo is not very stable and we had some issues during the implementation."

"Professional training and certification would be great."

"The configuration is difficult."

"The stability is not very good."

"The high availability function of the box requires a long time to switch over from one appliance to another."

"Monitoring of the platform should be easier and more functional so that you can have a clear picture of the running service."

"The only part of the Safeguard solution that I think could be a problem over time is the amount of storage it takes in the sessions."

"We have issues using Safeguard to connect to and record from the cloud. Currently, they don't have a mechanism to record this type of connection."

"We should be able to create customized connectors in a better way. For ad hoc or special use cases, I sometimes find we have limitations. Improving the way we develop new connectors for non-typical systems would be beneficial."

"Cost-wise, it is a little bit expensive, which makes it difficult to get management approval. Its price should be reduced."

"Some of our users find the functionality a bit complex, and it could be made more user-friendly."

"I find it challenging mostly when managing complex work, especially when trying to implement it on a larger scale; sometimes it becomes slow, and the automation process also slows down."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."

"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."

"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible."

"The pricing is about $80,000 per 100 servers. There are few elective costs."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,668 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

University

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	67
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

One Identity Safeguard is priced at a premium level, typical for enterprise-grade privilege access management solutions. The licensing is generally based on the number of privileged accounts, users...

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong privilege access management solution, there are some areas where improvements can be made. The initial deployment and configuration can be complex, especial...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

In my daily operations, I rely on One Identity Safeguard for administrator requests for access through One Identity Safeguard, which are approved via workflows. Once approved, sessions are launched...

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 16% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM

Compared 12% of the time

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 8% of the time

SSH PrivX vs Fudo PAM

Compared 6% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Fudo PAM

Compared 6% of the time

More Fudo PAM Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 16% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 7% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 6% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 6% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

April 2026

Download Fudo PAM product report

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

April 2026

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Also Known As

Fudo Privileged Access Management

No data available

Overview

Fudo PAM provides an effective solution for managing privileged user access with advanced session recording, password management, and protocol compatibility, ensuring organizations efficiently control server activities.

Fudo PAM offers a flexible, intuitive interface that supports SCTP, STTPS, SQL, and MySQL protocols. It's known for its ease of installation and operation, facilitating server activity monitoring and control. However, there are areas for improvement in scaling, session, and password management usability. Users have noted setup complications and a lack of regional support, specifically in Ukraine, eyeing better educational services and an improved account-server matching system. Basic improvements are desired for privileged account search capabilities and the reduction of buggy installations. Primarily used by businesses to secure privileged access, it aids in remote access and password management, serving IT and database administrators, third parties, and clients, while integrators and resellers handle configuration and deployment.

What are the main features of Fudo PAM?

Session Recording: Allows comprehensive monitoring of server activities.
Password Management: Simplifies the administration of secure credentials.
Protocol Compatibility: Supports SCTP, STTPS, SQL, and MySQL for versatile use.
Flexible Interface: Enhances ease of use and adaptability for different users.

What benefits should users consider?

Efficient User Activity Control: Streamlines server monitoring and access management.
Improved Security: Strengthens secure management of privileged access and passwords.
Adaptability: Offers protocol support for a variety of systems.
Ease of Installation: Facilitates straightforward deployment in IT environments.

Fudo PAM is commonly implemented across industries focusing on securing privileged user access, enhancing remote access management, and maintaining secure, detailed user logs. Businesses use it internally or for clients, while integrators and resellers deploy it for their customers.

Fudo Security

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sample Customers

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard

April 2026

Free Report: Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard

Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,668 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.