Fudo PAM vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

Fudo Security and One Identity are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Fudo Security is ranked #22, while One Identity is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6. Fudo Security holds a 2.3% mindshare in PAM, compared to One Identity’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fudo Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Fudo PAM

Read 5 Fudo PAM reviews

1,550 Views
1,519 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Read 85 One Identity Safeguard reviews

8,528 Views
5,458 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Fudo PAM

One Identity Safeguard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

```html

One Identity Safeguard and Fudo PAM are key competitors in the Privileged Access Management market. Fudo PAM is favored for its comprehensive features, which seem to provide greater value in complex environments.

Features: One Identity Safeguard provides robust session monitoring, an efficient workflow system, and competitive pricing. Fudo PAM offers advanced session recording, real-time analytics, and innovative security management features.

Room for Improvement: One Identity Safeguard requires better integration with IT systems, more detailed documentation, and enhancements in user interface. Fudo PAM needs improvements in documentation, training resources, and software stability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard facilitates straightforward deployment with strong technical support. Fudo PAM involves a more complex deployment process but has responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard is cost-effective with favorable ROI from lower setup costs. Fudo PAM, although more expensive initially, offers a higher long-term ROI due to its enhanced security features.

```

To learn more, read our detailed Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 899,052 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fudo PAM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (2nd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Fudo PAM is 2.3%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 4.3%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
One Identity Safeguard	4.3%
Fudo PAM	2.3%
Other	93.4%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Taras Dubrova

BDM at Oberig-it

Works with SCTP, STTPS, SQL, and MySQL protocols

There are some areas for improvement in the Fudo PAM cake that we want to improve in terms of scaling. Scaling is an optional feature because we closed some big projects with enterprise customers from different countries, including Ukraine, Kaloxetine, Uzbekistan, and others. We closed projects in different areas with customers of different sizes. When we talk about enterprise customers, we should consider that they have different use cases and desires for Fudo PAM. We compared our options for customers to choose their vendors, and we discovered Fudo PAM has few scaling options. In Fudo PAM, there should be additional features for scaling and organizing remote sessions for remote systems in remote networks.

Read full review

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Executive at DigitalTrack Solutions Ind Pvt Ltd

Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I think that Fudo Privileged Access Management is a very good program."

"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."

"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."

"This is a solution that I recommend because it is a simple privileged access management system that is done very well."

"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."

"Right now we are encouraging our customers to use Fudo PAM because it is the only product in PAM technology that we have to offer them."

"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."

"The solution transparently integrates into the infrastructure and users do not notice it. I would give this feature the highest rating."

"We have limited the possibilities for malicious actions and have made it safer for our users when they are using privileged accounts."

"One Identity Safeguard has impacted our organization positively because it has helped us standardize how privileged access is managed and has also reduced dependency on manual efforts in password handling, improving operational control overall."

"One Identity Safeguard had a positive impact mainly in improving privilege access control, operational accountability, and audit readiness."

"Two-factor authentication has saved us from a couple of brute force attacks on a couple of our C-level executives."

"Once set up correctly, it provides strong security, better control over privileged access, and improves auditing and compliance significantly."

"The auditing and approval mechanisms are features we did not have before and are greatly appreciated."

"One Identity Safeguard has improved security a lot by controlling privileged access, and it also reduced risks since all sensitive activities are monitored and logged."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

Cons

"The stability is not very good."

"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."

"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."

"To tell you the truth, I find that Fudo is not very stable and we had some issues during the implementation."

"Professional training and certification would be great."

"The configuration is difficult."

"Now, I think the best way to improve it will be to optimize the software, because the software begins to consume more resources (physical)."

"The main thing that needs improvement is the slowness. Apart from that, the change password check-in feature also needs improvement because it is not working perfectly accurately."

"It takes some time to understand the features of One Identity Safeguard, and it would be more useful if it was easier to set up."

"The high availability function of the box itself requires a long time to switch over from one appliance to another, so there is room for improvement."

"For some users, the physical appliance has been a bit buggy."

"Overall, One Identity Safeguard works well, but it could be improved in terms of UI simplicity and ease of navigation, especially for new users."

"One Identity Safeguard could be improved with a more user-friendly interface and simpler initial setup, as the learning curve can be somewhat steep."

"Transparent mode was too cumbersome, so I don't foresee us being able to use it. On paper when we were initially talking about it, it was definitely going to be the preferred method until we realized the burden it would be on our network guys. Then, we had to step back and reevaluate what we wanted to do. That's when we changed our approach to use the RD Gateway feature."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."

"As compared to other products, it is reasonable, but the training sessions are too expensive."

"The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible."

"The license is around $3,000 per month."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"The license is very expensive for us, partly due to inflation and partly because of the exchange rate between the Dollar and the Iranian Rial. We purchased a perpetual license that we've been using up until now, but I believe that we are not going to update it in the future. Instead, we plan to find another third-party to support us with the license, in the sense that we would have access to their license as a shared agreement."

"It is cheaper than CyberArk. Its price is fair."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

899,052 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Retailer

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	82
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

One Identity Safeguard is positioned as an enterprise-grade PAM solution, so the cost is on the higher side.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

One Identity Safeguard is a strong PAM solution, but there are some areas for improvement. The initial deployment and integration process can be complex in large enterprise environments. The user i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

My main use case for One Identity Safeguard is that it serves as a secure, strong PAM solution, and we are using it for PAM authentication. In daily work, we use One Identity Safeguard for privileg...

See all answers

Comparisons

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 19% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM

Compared 11% of the time

Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 7% of the time

Safeguard On Demand vs Fudo PAM

Compared 6% of the time

More Fudo PAM Competitors

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 15% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 7% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 5% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 4% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

May 2026

Download Fudo PAM product report

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

May 2026

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Also Known As

Fudo Privileged Access Management

No data available

Overview

Fudo PAM provides an effective solution for managing privileged user access with advanced session recording, password management, and protocol compatibility, ensuring organizations efficiently control server activities.

Fudo PAM offers a flexible, intuitive interface that supports SCTP, STTPS, SQL, and MySQL protocols. It's known for its ease of installation and operation, facilitating server activity monitoring and control. However, there are areas for improvement in scaling, session, and password management usability. Users have noted setup complications and a lack of regional support, specifically in Ukraine, eyeing better educational services and an improved account-server matching system. Basic improvements are desired for privileged account search capabilities and the reduction of buggy installations. Primarily used by businesses to secure privileged access, it aids in remote access and password management, serving IT and database administrators, third parties, and clients, while integrators and resellers handle configuration and deployment.

What are the main features of Fudo PAM?

Session Recording: Allows comprehensive monitoring of server activities.
Password Management: Simplifies the administration of secure credentials.
Protocol Compatibility: Supports SCTP, STTPS, SQL, and MySQL for versatile use.
Flexible Interface: Enhances ease of use and adaptability for different users.

What benefits should users consider?

Efficient User Activity Control: Streamlines server monitoring and access management.
Improved Security: Strengthens secure management of privileged access and passwords.
Adaptability: Offers protocol support for a variety of systems.
Ease of Installation: Facilitates straightforward deployment in IT environments.

Fudo PAM is commonly implemented across industries focusing on securing privileged user access, enhancing remote access management, and maintaining secure, detailed user logs. Businesses use it internally or for clients, while integrators and resellers deploy it for their customers.

Fudo Security

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sample Customers

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard

April 2026

Free Report: Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard

Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

899,052 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.