Fudo PAM vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

Fudo Security and One Identity are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Fudo Security is ranked #24, while One Identity is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. Fudo Security holds a 2.4% mindshare in PAM, compared to One Identity’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fudo Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Fudo PAM

Read 5 Fudo PAM reviews

1,442 Views
1,413 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Read 73 One Identity Safeguard reviews

7,550 Views
4,908 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Fudo PAM

One Identity Safeguard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

```html

One Identity Safeguard and Fudo PAM are key competitors in the Privileged Access Management market. Fudo PAM is favored for its comprehensive features, which seem to provide greater value in complex environments.

Features: One Identity Safeguard provides robust session monitoring, an efficient workflow system, and competitive pricing. Fudo PAM offers advanced session recording, real-time analytics, and innovative security management features.

Room for Improvement: One Identity Safeguard requires better integration with IT systems, more detailed documentation, and enhancements in user interface. Fudo PAM needs improvements in documentation, training resources, and software stability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard facilitates straightforward deployment with strong technical support. Fudo PAM involves a more complex deployment process but has responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard is cost-effective with favorable ROI from lower setup costs. Fudo PAM, although more expensive initially, offers a higher long-term ROI due to its enhanced security features.

```

To learn more, read our detailed Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 892,383 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fudo PAM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

24th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (3rd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Fudo PAM is 2.4%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 4.4%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
One Identity Safeguard	4.4%
Fudo PAM	2.4%
Other	93.2%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Taras Dubrova

BDM at Oberig-it

Works with SCTP, STTPS, SQL, and MySQL protocols

There are some areas for improvement in the Fudo PAM cake that we want to improve in terms of scaling. Scaling is an optional feature because we closed some big projects with enterprise customers from different countries, including Ukraine, Kaloxetine, Uzbekistan, and others. We closed projects in different areas with customers of different sizes. When we talk about enterprise customers, we should consider that they have different use cases and desires for Fudo PAM. We compared our options for customers to choose their vendors, and we discovered Fudo PAM has few scaling options. In Fudo PAM, there should be additional features for scaling and organizing remote sessions for remote systems in remote networks.

Read full review

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Executive at DigitalTrack Solutions Ind Pvt Ltd

Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I think that Fudo Privileged Access Management is a very good program."

"Right now we are encouraging our customers to use Fudo PAM because it is the only product in PAM technology that we have to offer them."

"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."

"This is a solution that I recommend because it is a simple privileged access management system that is done very well."

"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."

"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."

"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."

"We use the solution’s “transparent mode” feature for privileged sessions. It is very easy because it is only a simple configuration for our users. We don't have to modify our network. We install it, configure it, and it works. So, it is super easy. The rollout for our users is seamless."

"One Identity Safeguard has made a noticeable positive impact on our organization by giving us much better control and visibility over privileged access."

"Two-factor authentication has saved us from a couple of brute force attacks on a couple of our C-level executives."

"We went from our teams complaining about the old product every day to not hearing one complaint at all and, as a matter of fact, I hear compliments about how much they love Safeguard."

"One Identity Safeguard has been a cost-effective tool that has prevented major security breaches, avoided insider threats and misuse of admin privileges, and reduced audit and compliance costs."

"We have limited the possibilities for malicious actions and have made it safer for our users when they are using privileged accounts."

"One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted our organization by giving us complete visibility over all privileged access, making compliance audits much easier than before, and ensuring that access is not time-bound, allowing admins access only for the duration they need it."

"One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted us because the fear of theft of passwords or IDs has been reduced to almost zero, significantly enhancing our security."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

Cons

"The configuration is difficult."

"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."

"Professional training and certification would be great."

"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."

"The stability is not very good."

"Professional training and certification would be great."

"To tell you the truth, I find that Fudo is not very stable and we had some issues during the implementation."

"The configuration is difficult."

"Now, I think the best way to improve it will be to optimize the software, because the software begins to consume more resources (physical)."

"The only part of the Safeguard solution that I think could be a problem over time is the amount of storage it takes in the sessions."

"There is room for improvement in the launch module. They built in a launch button but they don't have effective instructions for configuring it to allow it to launch an RDP session. They're working on that, but the button is in the live product. If they were going to install something that wasn't useful, they should have just disabled it and not rolled it out with the product."

"We've had issues managing accounts and access to some data saved on the servers. Accounts are granted a new working certificate daily. We have an account to do it on APIs online and sync it with that. If the path changes at some point or someone changes the password, I don't know if it's from the Active Directory or what."

"We would like to have the option of importing assets by using the CSV file. It was available in the earlier versions, but it is not available now."

"Transparent mode was too cumbersome, so I don't foresee us being able to use it. On paper when we were initially talking about it, it was definitely going to be the preferred method until we realized the burden it would be on our network guys. Then, we had to step back and reevaluate what we wanted to do. That's when we changed our approach to use the RD Gateway feature."

"Cost-wise, it is a little bit expensive, which makes it difficult to get management approval. Its price should be reduced."

"The interface is better now, but it still could be improved a lot. It needs more organization, menus, automatic refresh of information, and Web 2.0."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."

"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."

"The pricing is about $80,000 per 100 servers. There are few elective costs."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"They offer a fair price for a robust solution."

"It is cheaper than CyberArk. Its price is fair."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"It is more expensive than Secret Server but way less expensive than CyberArk. As a customer, I would like the pricing to be lower, but it has a good price point."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

University

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	57
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	29

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

I did not face any challenges with pricing, setup costs, and licensing, but for improved features, I need to address licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

The user interface can be improved for better searching of user accounts, and if One Identity enhances its support in that area, it would be very helpful. If One Identity improves integration durin...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

My main use case for One Identity Safeguard in day-to-day work is to provide identity across all user accounts and domains, and it improves security across the enterprise by providing enhanced feat...

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 15% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM

Compared 10% of the time

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 8% of the time

SSH PrivX vs Fudo PAM

Compared 6% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Fudo PAM

Compared 6% of the time

More Fudo PAM Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 17% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 8% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 6% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 6% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

April 2026

Download Fudo PAM product report

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

April 2026

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Also Known As

Fudo Privileged Access Management

No data available

Overview

Fudo PAM provides an effective solution for managing privileged user access with advanced session recording, password management, and protocol compatibility, ensuring organizations efficiently control server activities.

Fudo PAM offers a flexible, intuitive interface that supports SCTP, STTPS, SQL, and MySQL protocols. It's known for its ease of installation and operation, facilitating server activity monitoring and control. However, there are areas for improvement in scaling, session, and password management usability. Users have noted setup complications and a lack of regional support, specifically in Ukraine, eyeing better educational services and an improved account-server matching system. Basic improvements are desired for privileged account search capabilities and the reduction of buggy installations. Primarily used by businesses to secure privileged access, it aids in remote access and password management, serving IT and database administrators, third parties, and clients, while integrators and resellers handle configuration and deployment.

What are the main features of Fudo PAM?

Session Recording: Allows comprehensive monitoring of server activities.
Password Management: Simplifies the administration of secure credentials.
Protocol Compatibility: Supports SCTP, STTPS, SQL, and MySQL for versatile use.
Flexible Interface: Enhances ease of use and adaptability for different users.

What benefits should users consider?

Efficient User Activity Control: Streamlines server monitoring and access management.
Improved Security: Strengthens secure management of privileged access and passwords.
Adaptability: Offers protocol support for a variety of systems.
Ease of Installation: Facilitates straightforward deployment in IT environments.

Fudo PAM is commonly implemented across industries focusing on securing privileged user access, enhancing remote access management, and maintaining secure, detailed user logs. Businesses use it internally or for clients, while integrators and resellers deploy it for their customers.

Fudo Security

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sample Customers

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard

April 2026

Free Report: Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard

Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.