Fudo PAM vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fudo Security Logo
1,090 views|644 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
One Identity Logo
3,615 views|1,563 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fudo PAM and One Identity Safeguard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,968 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything.""We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX.""Session recording and password management are the two main aspects.""it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company.""Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."

More Fudo PAM Pros →

"The identity discovery is good, and the performance is pretty good value.""The first feature I like about One Identity Safeguard is the live contact point for the VPNs. This has been working very well for us, as it's both highly available and reliable.""I like the discovery functionality and the change password feature through the check-in. I also like the bulk import with the help of templates that come with it out of the box. With the help of these few features, my tasks are made easier.""We use the solution’s Approval Anywhere feature which enables us to add an extra layer of security for critical passwords without adding time-consuming approval processes. By using this platform, if someone goes on a vacation, out of office, or needs urgent/planned leave, then our setup will select the functions tied to that person and automatically delegate them to the next person. That person can start performing that duty based on their access. No sharing of passwords is required.""All the features are promising, but we love the reporting feature because we can get each and every report. That's a major compliance requirement. Its reporting is really amazing, and it has made life a lot easier.""The monitoring system is very good.""It is easy to manage. There is a very logical, clear user interface. Also, the integration of scripts is thoughtfully implemented. Overall, it's a nice product to manage.""The solution's most valuable features are the efficiency and the quality of the recording."

More One Identity Safeguard Pros →

"The stability is not very good.""I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server.""The configuration is difficult.""Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong.""Professional training and certification would be great."

More Fudo PAM Cons →

"When we compare One Identity Safeguard with Cyberark, we know CyberArk has other tools or other features that are more complex and more useful for the customers. For example, I have one customer that wants to elevate the permission that is available in CyberArk.""Transparent mode was too cumbersome, so I don't foresee us being able to use it. On paper when we were initially talking about it, it was definitely going to be the preferred method until we realized the burden it would be on our network guys. Then, we had to step back and reevaluate what we wanted to do. That's when we changed our approach to use the RD Gateway feature.""I would like to see support for RDP over HTTPS so this product can be used in conjunction with the Microsoft terminal.""Even though we have two nodes, there's no way to do an upgrade without taking everything completely offline. It would be nice if they could improve that.""Some of the out-of-the-box reporting isn't that rich. We spoke to our Safeguard reps who have acknowledged that some of the reporting features can certainly be improved and that we're not the only customer who has cited this. There are very little out-of-the-box reporting capabilities. You have to build the queries and the report. I believe in the next release they're going to be addressing this.""The deployment affects our privileged users because it takes a long time for them to request privileges, which impacts the SLA.""One Identity Safeguard can improve by having more integration with multiple devices.""The high availability function of the box requires a long time to switch over from one appliance to another."

More One Identity Safeguard Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."
  • More Fudo PAM Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."
  • "Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."
  • "It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated."
  • "They offer a fair price for a robust solution."
  • "The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible."
  • "It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody."
  • "The pricing is about $80,000 per 100 servers. There are few elective costs."
  • "We have a yearly license. The cost depends on how much a company wants to invest in technology. In our organization, we believe in modern digitization and automation processes so we found it affordable. One Identity was not that much less than other solutions and it is not a cheap solution. There were number of cheaper solutions. However, it's the most effective, according to our evaluation."
  • More One Identity Safeguard Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,968 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Session recording and password management are the two main aspects.
    Top Answer:There are some areas for improvement in the Fudo PAM cake that we want to improve in terms of scaling. Scaling is an optional feature because we closed some big projects with enterprise customers from… more »
    Top Answer:The main use case is for protecting privileged user access, such as securing remote access services. Another important use case is when we work with third-party users and need to provide password… more »
    Top Answer:The identity discovery is good, and the performance is pretty good value.
    Top Answer:They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base. Usually, they start at one price, and when you start pricing the competition, you… more »
    Top Answer:Something for One Identity to look at is having integration guidelines for how to logically group accounts. This is always something you need people to do. It would be especially helpful when you have… more »
    Average Words per Review
    Average Words per Review
    Also Known As
    Fudo Privileged Access Management
    Learn More

    We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

    One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

    Sample Customers
    KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL
    Top Industries
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Media Company8%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Financial Services Firm40%
    Healthcare Company15%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise40%
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise55%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,968 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fudo PAM is ranked 21st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 5 reviews while One Identity Safeguard is ranked 4th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 39 reviews. Fudo PAM is rated 8.0, while One Identity Safeguard is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Safeguard writes "Provides us with centralized storage of secrets and credentials, and visibility into the use of privileged access". Fudo PAM is most compared with WALLIX Bastion, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Delinea Secret Server, Teleport and ManageEngine PAM360, whereas One Identity Safeguard is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, WALLIX Bastion, Delinea Secret Server, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access and ObserveIT. See our Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard report.

    See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

    We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.