Fudo PAM vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

Fudo Security and One Identity are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Fudo Security is ranked #25, while One Identity is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0. Fudo Security holds a 2.3% mindshare in PAM, compared to One Identity’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fudo Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Fudo PAM

Read 5 Fudo PAM reviews

1,276 Views
1,250 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Read 63 One Identity Safeguard reviews

6,465 Views
4,332 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Fudo PAM

One Identity Safeguard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

```html

One Identity Safeguard and Fudo PAM are key competitors in the Privileged Access Management market. Fudo PAM is favored for its comprehensive features, which seem to provide greater value in complex environments.

Features: One Identity Safeguard provides robust session monitoring, an efficient workflow system, and competitive pricing. Fudo PAM offers advanced session recording, real-time analytics, and innovative security management features.

Room for Improvement: One Identity Safeguard requires better integration with IT systems, more detailed documentation, and enhancements in user interface. Fudo PAM needs improvements in documentation, training resources, and software stability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard facilitates straightforward deployment with strong technical support. Fudo PAM involves a more complex deployment process but has responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard is cost-effective with favorable ROI from lower setup costs. Fudo PAM, although more expensive initially, offers a higher long-term ROI due to its enhanced security features.

```

To learn more, read our detailed Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,906 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fudo PAM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (4th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Fudo PAM is 2.3%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 4.4%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
One Identity Safeguard	4.4%
Fudo PAM	2.3%
Other	93.3%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Taras Dubrova

BDM at Oberig-it

Works with SCTP, STTPS, SQL, and MySQL protocols

There are some areas for improvement in the Fudo PAM cake that we want to improve in terms of scaling. Scaling is an optional feature because we closed some big projects with enterprise customers from different countries, including Ukraine, Kaloxetine, Uzbekistan, and others. We closed projects in different areas with customers of different sizes. When we talk about enterprise customers, we should consider that they have different use cases and desires for Fudo PAM. We compared our options for customers to choose their vendors, and we discovered Fudo PAM has few scaling options. In Fudo PAM, there should be additional features for scaling and organizing remote sessions for remote systems in remote networks.

Read full review

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Associate at a integrator with 501-1,000 employees

Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Right now we are encouraging our customers to use Fudo PAM because it is the only product in PAM technology that we have to offer them."

"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."

"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."

"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."

"I think that Fudo Privileged Access Management is a very good program."

"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."

"This is a solution that I recommend because it is a simple privileged access management system that is done very well."

"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

"One of the most important aspects is that it is very easy to use and install. It is also agentless, so all of the operations happen more smoothly than any other product."

"My advice to others is One Identity Safeguard is a must to have because it's part of the cybersecurity framework, such as Nest ISO."

"There are numerous valuable data protection features, including the content and information that offer us more scalable protection as needed."

"There is ease of implementation."

"It is easy to manage. There is a very logical, clear user interface. Also, the integration of scripts is thoughtfully implemented. Overall, it's a nice product to manage."

"One Identity Safeguard positively impacts our organization by reducing the likelihood of breaches from privileged sprawl by removing shared admin passwords and enforcing control checkouts while also improving our investigation times and providing strong forensics from a centralized location."

"Two-factor authentication has saved us from a couple of brute force attacks on a couple of our C-level executives."

"My advice for others looking into using One Identity Safeguard is that it is a great solution for simple tasks, with a good price and good functionality."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

Cons

"The stability is not very good."

"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."

"The configuration is difficult."

"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."

"The configuration is difficult."

"Professional training and certification would be great."

"To tell you the truth, I find that Fudo is not very stable and we had some issues during the implementation."

"I rate customer support six out of ten. It needs improvement as it can significantly impact customer access."

"We currently have a problem with the Active Directory integrations on Windows. Some of our users need to be logged with Active Directory, but we are having communication issues between One Identity and Active Directory. It seems that Active Directory is not well-integrated."

"They should provide a faster user interface, as we have noticed that the user interface acts slow when there are a large number of accounts or concurrent sessions going on."

"There is a lack of documentation and many problems with the plugins."

"Transparent mode was too cumbersome, so I don't foresee us being able to use it."

"I would like to see an adjustment with more enterprise architecture."

"For the A2A use, it is not as easy as using something like HashiCorp's password management tools."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"It is more expensive than Secret Server but way less expensive than CyberArk. As a customer, I would like the pricing to be lower, but it has a good price point."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base."

"It is cheaper than CyberArk. Its price is fair."

"They offer a fair price for a robust solution."

"The pricing is about $80,000 per 100 servers. There are few elective costs."

"We bought their other products, so it was not that expensive. It is one of those where the more you buy, the cheaper it is."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

University

11%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	50
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

I did not face any challenges with pricing, setup costs, and licensing, but for improved features, I need to address licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

The user interface can be improved for better searching of user accounts, and if One Identity enhances its support in that area, it would be very helpful. If One Identity improves integration durin...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

My main use case for One Identity Safeguard in day-to-day work is to provide identity across all user accounts and domains, and it improves security across the enterprise by providing enhanced feat...

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 14% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM

Compared 11% of the time

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 8% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Fudo PAM

Compared 6% of the time

SSH PrivX vs Fudo PAM

Compared 6% of the time

More Fudo PAM Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 17% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 8% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 6% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 6% of the time

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 2% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

March 2026

Download Fudo PAM product report

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

March 2026

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Also Known As

Fudo Privileged Access Management

No data available

Overview

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Fudo Security

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sample Customers

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard

April 2026

Free Report: Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard

Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.