Fudo PAM vs WALLIX Bastion comparison

Fudo Security and WALLIX are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Fudo Security is ranked #21, while WALLIX is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.2. Fudo Security holds a 2.8% mindshare in PAM, compared to WALLIX’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fudo Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of WALLIX users who would recommend it.

Fudo PAM

Read 5 Fudo PAM reviews

1,080 Views
1,069 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WALLIX Bastion

Read 12 WALLIX Bastion reviews

2,776 Views
2,720 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Fudo PAM

WALLIX Bastion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

WALLIX Bastion and Fudo PAM are leading solutions in the privileged access management sector. WALLIX Bastion stands out with its customer support, while Fudo PAM is noted for its features that justify its cost.

Features: WALLIX Bastion is renowned for its security aspects, ease of configuration, and effective access control. Fudo PAM shines with advanced session management, scalability, and detailed auditing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: WALLIX Bastion could enhance reporting features and streamline its integration process. Fudo PAM would benefit from a more intuitive interface and better module communication. Both have room for refinement based on user feedback.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WALLIX Bastion offers rapid deployment and responsive customer service. Fudo PAM also ensures reliable deployment with more initial setup needed. Customer support is strong for both, with WALLIX having quicker response times.

Pricing and ROI: WALLIX Bastion's competitive pricing and efficient setup lead to a faster ROI. Fudo PAM is costlier, but its features and long-term benefits make the investment worthwhile. WALLIX's pricing is seen as more advantageous in the short term, though Fudo's long-term ROI is significant.

To learn more, read our detailed Fudo PAM vs. WALLIX Bastion Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. WALLIX Bastion

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fudo PAM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WALLIX Bastion

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Fudo PAM is 2.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WALLIX Bastion is 5.1%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
WALLIX Bastion	5.1%
Fudo PAM	2.8%
Other	92.1%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Taras Dubrova

BDM at Oberig-it

Works with SCTP, STTPS, SQL, and MySQL protocols

There are some areas for improvement in the Fudo PAM cake that we want to improve in terms of scaling. Scaling is an optional feature because we closed some big projects with enterprise customers from different countries, including Ukraine, Kaloxetine, Uzbekistan, and others. We closed projects in different areas with customers of different sizes. When we talk about enterprise customers, we should consider that they have different use cases and desires for Fudo PAM. We compared our options for customers to choose their vendors, and we discovered Fudo PAM has few scaling options. In Fudo PAM, there should be additional features for scaling and organizing remote sessions for remote systems in remote networks.

Read full review

Abdulaziz Alghamdi

System Engineer at Saudia technic

Password management secures sessions but auditing features need enhancement

The most valuable feature of WALLIX Bastion is its password management capability, which is central to safeguarding sensitive information. The password rotation feature changes passwords after eight sessions, thus protecting both our sessions and assets. Additionally, the workflow feature is unique to WALLIX solutions, enhancing our access security. It is the only solution we found with this feature, making it a distinct choice for our needs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."

"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."

"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."

"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."

"WALLIX Bastion's most valuable feature is the Access Manager because you can use it and access the data center without any client VPN."

"The interface is very simple. It doesn't need any plug-ins, just browsers that are installed at the beginning."

"We use WALLIX Bastion to provide access and to monitor sessions."

"Its video recording capabilities have definitely been key for us."

"Bastion provides a kind of isolation between the administration laptop and the server you want to administer."

"I like that it's Linux-based, and you don't need to have separate implementations, extra database licenses, or enterprise licenses. I think because it's Linux-based, it's more seamless than Windows. I also like the access manager, which I think is a super tool. Everything is browser-based, and you don't need a VPN. So, that's a great thing."

"The most valuable feature of WALLIX Bastion is its password management capability, which is central to safeguarding sensitive information."

"Bastion provides a kind of isolation between the administration laptop and the server you want to administer."

More WALLIX Bastion pros

Cons

"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."

"The stability is not very good."

"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."

"Professional training and certification would be great."

"The configuration is difficult."

"The main problem of Bastion, CyberArk, and WALLIX is that they have the same interface for both administration and users, which is not a good idea from a security perspective."

"For me, the main issue has to do with the system performance itself."

"It would be better if I could manage multiple accounts in one place, like CyberArk. With WALLIX, you can only manage one account, and you are given a separate category. You have to click on each connection to do anything. For example, CyberArk might give three options for one connection if you want to have an interactive user-level experience. But with WALLIX, you have to click three times to get that access. Also, the biggest disadvantage of WALLIX is the reporting. I feel like it's very weak in reporting when compared to the other solutions. As a solution, they're good and stable. But they need to make their reports neater and better. Right now, we're going to the console and then pressing buttons every single time."

"There should be more effort to increase the level of security."

"There could be more automation features for the solution."

"The scalability of WALLIX Bastion is rated seven out of ten. While it meets our current needs, scaling up the solution is not as easy, and improvements could be made in this area."

"WALLIX Bastion is GUI-driven, but it sometimes needs some management."

"Based on my experience as a sales tech person, one area of improvement could be a more unified licensing model."

More WALLIX Bastion cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."

"The solution's price is mid-ranged."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to that of other products."

"Some extra price needs to be paid for license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about WALLIX Bastion?

The support is great. They offer 24/7 support, but the specific level of support depends on your subscription. There's a weekday-only option, and a 24/7 option that covers all days of the week. The...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WALLIX Bastion?

The price of WALLIX Bastion is rated five out of ten, positioning it in the middle. The cost is justified by the features and capabilities we receive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WALLIX Bastion?

The auditing and reporting features of WALLIX Bastion could be improved. Customizable reports could be introduced to generate dynamic reports based on our requirements. Adding flowcharts for the re...

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 17% of the time

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 8% of the time

ManageEngine PAM360 vs Fudo PAM

Compared 8% of the time

Teleport vs Fudo PAM

Compared 8% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Fudo PAM

Compared 7% of the time

More Fudo PAM Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs WALLIX Bastion

Compared 25% of the time

Teleport vs WALLIX Bastion

Compared 7% of the time

One Identity Safeguard vs WALLIX Bastion

Compared 6% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs WALLIX Bastion

Compared 6% of the time

ManageEngine PAM360 vs WALLIX Bastion

Compared 5% of the time

More WALLIX Bastion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

December 2025

Download Fudo PAM product report

Buyer's Guide

WALLIX Bastion

December 2025

Download WALLIX Bastion product report

Also Known As

Fudo Privileged Access Management

Bastion

Overview

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Fudo Security

WALLIX offers cybersecurity and privileged access management solutions that secure and protect your most critical IT assets.

WALLIX

Sample Customers

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL

RTBF, Pharmagest, Michelin Group, Niort Hospital

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. WALLIX Bastion

December 2025

Free Report: Fudo PAM vs. WALLIX Bastion

Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. WALLIX Bastion and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fudo PAM vs. WALLIX Bastion report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.