We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Fudo PAM vs WALLIX Bastion comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fudo PAM Logo
1,403 views|843 comparisons
WALLIX Bastion Logo
3,823 views|2,442 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. WALLIX Bastion and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
563,327 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX.""Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector.""it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."

More Fudo PAM Pros →

"Its video recording capabilities have definitely been key for us.""I like that it's Linux-based, and you don't need to have separate implementations, extra database licenses, or enterprise licenses. I think because it's Linux-based, it's more seamless than Windows. I also like the access manager, which I think is a super tool. Everything is browser-based, and you don't need a VPN. So, that's a great thing."

More WALLIX Bastion Pros →

Cons
"The stability is not very good.""Professional training and certification would be great.""The configuration is difficult."

More Fudo PAM Cons →

"For me, the main issue has to do with the system performance itself.""It would be better if I could manage multiple accounts in one place, like CyberArk. With WALLIX, you can only manage one account, and you are given a separate category. You have to click on each connection to do anything. For example, CyberArk might give three options for one connection if you want to have an interactive user-level experience. But with WALLIX, you have to click three times to get that access. Also, the biggest disadvantage of WALLIX is the reporting. I feel like it's very weak in reporting when compared to the other solutions. As a solution, they're good and stable. But they need to make their reports neater and better. Right now, we're going to the console and then pressing buttons every single time."

More WALLIX Bastion Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
563,327 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: 
Its video recording capabilities have definitely been key for us.
Top Answer: 
Within our company, there are roughly 200 employees that use this solution, including partners and outsourced employees. There are two of us that handle all maintenance-related issues.
Top Answer: 
I wouldn't advise others to start with a huge license. Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of seven. There are some features we have not tested yet like two-factor… more »
Ranking
Views
1,403
Comparisons
843
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
464
Rating
8.0
Views
3,823
Comparisons
2,442
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
677
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Fudo Privileged Access Management
Bastion
Learn More
Overview

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

WALLIX offers cybersecurity and privileged access management solutions that secure and protect your most critical IT assets.

Offer
Learn more about Fudo PAM
Learn more about WALLIX Bastion
Sample Customers
KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL
RTBF, Pharmagest, Michelin Group, Niort Hospital
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider28%
Computer Software Company27%
Financial Services Firm10%
Educational Organization6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider32%
Computer Software Company24%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. WALLIX Bastion and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
563,327 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fudo PAM is ranked 7th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 3 reviews while WALLIX Bastion is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 2 reviews. Fudo PAM is rated 8.0, while WALLIX Bastion is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Our research shows this is superior to competing products in some ways". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WALLIX Bastion writes "A stable privileged access managed service with an useful secure and seamless access management feature". Fudo PAM is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, One Identity Safeguard, Symantec Privileged Access Manager, Thycotic Secret Server and NetIQ Privileged Account Manager, whereas WALLIX Bastion is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access, Thycotic Secret Server, One Identity Safeguard and ManageEngine Password Manager Pro. See our Fudo PAM vs. WALLIX Bastion report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.