CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Fudo PAM comparison

CyberArk and Fudo Security are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. CyberArk is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.8, while Fudo Security is ranked #25. CyberArk holds a 2.4% mindshare in PAM, compared to Fudo Security’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fudo Security users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Read 38 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews

4,393 Views
1,274 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Fudo PAM

Read 5 Fudo PAM reviews

1,175 Views
1,152 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Fudo PAM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Fudo PAM compete in endpoint security and privileged access management. CyberArk generally has an edge in integration capabilities and customer support, while Fudo PAM offers a better value with its robust features despite higher costs.

Features: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager offers seamless integration with existing systems, effective privilege management across platforms, and straightforward deployment. Fudo PAM is recognized for its advanced session monitoring, comprehensive suite of security features, and robust recording capabilities.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk users highlight complexities in managing extended features, potential scalability issues, and a need for finer-grain control in configurations. Fudo PAM could benefit from enhanced scalability, more streamlined configuration processes, and reduced learning curve challenges.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk provides a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Fudo PAM offers comprehensive training, though it can pose a steeper learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk is cost-effective in setup and ongoing expenses, delivering satisfactory ROI. Fudo PAM has a higher initial cost, but users recognize a strong return on investment due to its feature-rich offerings.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Fudo PAM Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Fudo PAM

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Compliance (5th), Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Application Control (3rd), Ransomware Protection (5th)

Fudo PAM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 2.4%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fudo PAM is 2.5%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager	2.4%
Fudo PAM	2.5%
Other	95.1%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Padmanabha Hegde

Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

MFA boosts protection and has blocking capabilities but dependency on other solutions complicates deployment

The main issues I experience are related to deployment, which requires dependency on other solutions like AD or SCCM. These tools need to be defined and synced with the client or agent and master, sometimes needing manual checks. The agent may have problems syncing, which complicates deployment, especially when users leave the organization, however, agents remain licensed since the server still maintains licenses. Additionally, compared to other endpoint managers like Thycotic, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager lacks recording capabilities, which limits its functionality for critical applications. A feature that records activity, even when bypassing CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, would be beneficial.

Read full review

Taras Dubrova

BDM at Oberig-it

Works with SCTP, STTPS, SQL, and MySQL protocols

There are some areas for improvement in the Fudo PAM cake that we want to improve in terms of scaling. Scaling is an optional feature because we closed some big projects with enterprise customers from different countries, including Ukraine, Kaloxetine, Uzbekistan, and others. We closed projects in different areas with customers of different sizes. When we talk about enterprise customers, we should consider that they have different use cases and desires for Fudo PAM. We compared our options for customers to choose their vendors, and we discovered Fudo PAM has few scaling options. In Fudo PAM, there should be additional features for scaling and organizing remote sessions for remote systems in remote networks.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to control users with admin rights. Even if developers and senior folks maintain their admin rights, we can still manage their activities."

"In terms of removing local admin credentials on the endpoint and the effect on the size of the attack surface in our organization, it has drastically reduced the attack surface for local administrative rights and the chance of escalation of privilege."

"This is the number one product for privilege account security."

"The biggest benefit of CyberArk EPM for our customers is control over privileged access for endpoints. Endpoints are often the starting point for attackers to enter and move within a network. CyberArk EPM bridges the gap between security and operations teams. Operations teams are happy because work isn't stopped due to admin rights issues, while security teams are satisfied that full admin rights aren't given to all users."

"We can do both server and endpoint protection."

"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its high performance, it's the best identity security platform. The security is good. It's easy to showcase the feature and capabilities and compare it with other competitors. It competes well with other solutions. Additionally, it is a complete solution."

"The most valuable features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager are password management, session management, onboarding rules, platform customization, and safety management."

"We did immediately begin to see results when using CyberArk."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pros

"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."

"Right now we are encouraging our customers to use Fudo PAM because it is the only product in PAM technology that we have to offer them."

"This is a solution that I recommend because it is a simple privileged access management system that is done very well."

"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."

"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."

"I think that Fudo Privileged Access Management is a very good program."

"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."

Cons

"The main issues I experience are related to deployment, which requires dependency on other solutions like AD or SCCM."

"The solution can be complex to use at times."

"CyberArk should consider whitelisting important applications like PowerShell and DLL that are currently not allowed due to some malicious content."

"There are many features that are currently missing. A customization option is required for certain policies."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager could be improved by simplifying the administration process, specifically when setting up policies and applications."

"Compared to other tools like Linux, this solution isn't as user-friendly."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager can be better by making its UI more consistent."

"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price should be made more flexible."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager cons

"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."

"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."

"Professional training and certification would be great."

"To tell you the truth, I find that Fudo is not very stable and we had some issues during the implementation."

"Professional training and certification would be great."

"The configuration is difficult."

"The stability is not very good."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's license is easy to procure."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable for customers."

"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive."

"We pay about $17 per user."

"The professional services for one eight-hour day would be $1,800."

"The tool is a bit pricey compared to its competitors. My company does work with competitors, but I don't have hands-on experience with other software. I've just done some comparisons."

"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive. The solution is priced based on the number of accounts onboarded and the number of concurrent sessions. Everyone else is included in the price, such as support."

"It's not at the lower end of the market. I think the price is reasonable considering the quality it delivers. It is a top-notch solution at a fair price point."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	18

No data available

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...

See all answers

What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing t...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 7% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 7% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 6% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 2% of the time

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 16% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM

Compared 14% of the time

SSH PrivX vs Fudo PAM

Compared 8% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Fudo PAM

Compared 7% of the time

ManageEngine PAM360 vs Fudo PAM

Compared 5% of the time

More Fudo PAM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

March 2026

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report

Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

March 2026

Download Fudo PAM product report

Also Known As

Viewfinity

Fudo Privileged Access Management

Overview

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

CyberArk

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Fudo Security

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Fudo PAM

March 2026

Free Report: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Fudo PAM

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Fudo PAM and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Fudo PAM report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.