CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Fudo PAM comparison

CyberArk and Fudo Security are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. CyberArk is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while Fudo Security is ranked #22. CyberArk holds a 3.2% mindshare in PAM, compared to Fudo Security’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fudo Security users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Read 38 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews

1,223 Views
764 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Fudo PAM

Read 5 Fudo PAM reviews

994 Views
530 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Fudo PAM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Fudo PAM compete in endpoint security and privileged access management. CyberArk generally has an edge in integration capabilities and customer support, while Fudo PAM offers a better value with its robust features despite higher costs.

Features: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager offers seamless integration with existing systems, effective privilege management across platforms, and straightforward deployment. Fudo PAM is recognized for its advanced session monitoring, comprehensive suite of security features, and robust recording capabilities.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk users highlight complexities in managing extended features, potential scalability issues, and a need for finer-grain control in configurations. Fudo PAM could benefit from enhanced scalability, more streamlined configuration processes, and reduced learning curve challenges.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk provides a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Fudo PAM offers comprehensive training, though it can pose a steeper learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk is cost-effective in setup and ongoing expenses, delivering satisfactory ROI. Fudo PAM has a higher initial cost, but users recognize a strong return on investment due to its feature-rich offerings.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Fudo PAM Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Fudo PAM

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Compliance (5th), Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Application Control (5th), Ransomware Protection (5th)

Fudo PAM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 3.2%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fudo PAM is 2.7%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Sumit Chavan

Lead Consultant at Aujas Networks Pvt Ltd

Helps secure the infrastructure and control users with admin rights

There are many features that are currently missing. A customization option is required for certain policies. For instance, if we need to stop PowerShell scripting, we have to create a different policy for that. Being able to create a sub-level policy within a top-level policy would be good. Currently, no user-based policy option is available inside the EPM console. We can only create computer-based policies. The database is available, but there is a drawback in not being able to create local groups on the EPM console. We only have to depend on Active Directory. This limits infrastructure security as we depend on the Active Directory team to manage user groups. If they remove any users, we lose control. If we could create groups locally and block them or set specific policies, we would have more control. Local endpoint management is missing from the EPM site. Moreover, there is an issue with policies not running as expected when we make enhancements. We have to find multiple ways to whitelist applications or enhance policies.

Read full review

Oleksiy-Zaionchkovskyy

Security Solutions Architect at Netwave

Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization

I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server. Working with 100 or 200 server installations is comfortable, but not thousands. The scalability isn't very good because it's complicated. I would like more organization. For instance, they could add a table that matches an account to many servers at once. There could also be better education services. They don't have any certification program, at least in Ukraine, so the training is complicated and divided into different pieces. Cisco, for example, has a great education program that starts from the basics and progresses to advanced features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Our setup process is moving to the cloud, which is very good. It reduces complexity."

"The password rotation and the session recording are the most valuable features."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is very easy to manage, which I like. The solution also has a dashboard where you can see which software is suspicious, which I find valuable."

"We did immediately begin to see results when using CyberArk."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to control users with admin rights. Even if developers and senior folks maintain their admin rights, we can still manage their activities."

"It has drastically reduced the attack surface for local administrative rights and the chance of escalation of privilege. We've removed, at this point, close to 98 percent of the local administrative accounts on workstations. If there were an incident, it would stop at that point and we'd be able to know."

"It allows whitelisting."

"We can do both server and endpoint protection."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pros

"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."

"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."

"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."

"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."

Cons

"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price should be made more flexible."

"CyberArk meets clients' need very spot-on. It covers everything customers ask for. As for improvements, honestly, the feedback's been really positive. I haven't heard any specific areas that need work."

"The price of the solution should improve."

"The product's threat protection and defense capabilities need enhancement."

"Technical support is slow to respond when we run into issues."

"CyberArk should consider whitelisting important applications like PowerShell and DLL that are currently not allowed due to some malicious content."

"CyberArk has some performance issues. For example, servers could not handle the solution when we first took CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is not suitable for the current situation because when you compare it to OTP, OTP is the strongest password solution. You can use it as a one-time password, but you have to log into the password manager itself and if you don't change your password, it will be the weakest link in the security. In OTP, you don't have that weakest link."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager cons

"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."

"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."

"The stability is not very good."

"The configuration is difficult."

"Professional training and certification would be great."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's license is easy to procure."

"I feel that the price of the product is nominal. It must be around 10 to 15 USD per installation. I rate the product price an eight to nine out of ten, where one is high price, and ten is low price."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The solution requires an annual license to use it. There can be some extra costs in some cases."

"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since the price can be too high for smaller businesses."

"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive. The solution is priced based on the number of accounts onboarded and the number of concurrent sessions. Everyone else is included in the price, such as support."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a very high price, so it's a one out of ten for me in terms of pricing."

"Although I do not deal directly with the pricing, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is costly compared to other solutions. However, it offers beneficial features."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

18%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...

See all answers

What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing t...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 15% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 15% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Tanium vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 6% of the time

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 25% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM

Compared 16% of the time

Teleport vs Fudo PAM

Compared 15% of the time

ManageEngine PAM360 vs Fudo PAM

Compared 14% of the time

One Identity Safeguard vs Fudo PAM

Compared 11% of the time

More Fudo PAM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

June 2025

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report

Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

June 2025

Download Fudo PAM product report

Also Known As

Viewfinity

Fudo Privileged Access Management

Overview

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

CyberArk

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Fudo Security

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Fudo PAM

June 2025

Free Report: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Fudo PAM

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Fudo PAM and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Fudo PAM report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.