Tricentis Tosca and Qt Squish compete in the test automation software category. Based on feature versatility, Tricentis Tosca seems to have the upper hand due to its wide application support and intuitive interface.
Features: Tricentis Tosca offers robust features such as intuitive visual modeling, scriptless automation which suits non-technical users, and extensive support for both UI and non-UI technologies. It emphasizes model-based testing with risk-based approaches. Qt Squish focuses on automating cross-platform applications with a strong emphasis on Qt environments, offering the flexibility of scripting languages for automation and integration into CI systems.
Room for Improvement: Tricentis Tosca could improve its upgrade process and object recognition in web applications. Simplification in test case design and enhancements in enterprise features like centralized management are also needed. Qt Squish might benefit from improved object identification and a simpler scripting setup for non-technical users; object mapping and framework simplification could enhance accessibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca provides versatile deployment options across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, though this can add complexity. Its customer service is highly rated, but consistency and community engagement could improve. Qt Squish offers straightforward on-premises deployment, limiting cloud adaptability. Its customer service is reliable, effective in problem resolution.
Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca is expensive with a complex licensing model, offering high ROI through reduced test cycles and productivity gains. Qt Squish is also pricey, especially for developer licenses, but its effectiveness in specific environments could provide good ROI when costs align with productivity improvements.
For the part that has been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.
Tasks that typically take ten hours are reduced to two to three hours, representing a threefold productivity gain.
The overall competence of the support has declined; previously, the support was very good, but recently, it has become difficult to reach them and get solutions, and it's taking a lot of time.
My experience has been positive; their response to emails or phone calls in tech support is fast, usually between eight to ten hours.
There is no way to mark the importance or criticality of incidents when creating them.
With one license, just one user or one test scenario can be run at a time.
It covers a breadth of applications and products, demonstrating excellent scalability that I have seen in reality.
Scalability is excellent with Tricentis Tosca.
For performance and stability, Tricentis Tosca deserves a 10 out of 10.
The stability of Tricentis Tosca is rated ten out of ten. It is very stable.
I find stability issues when using the Vision AI feature; Tricentis Tosca is not very stable.
If you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java.
The self-healing process should automatically handle any changes in web applications; for instance, if properties change inside the application, the tool should automatically take care of it, unlike other tools such as Mabl and TestComplete that have better self-healing capabilities.
The Vision AI implementation works very slowly, affecting the speed of our work.
Moving to a cloud-based application rather than a desktop one could improve Tosca.
For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.
The pricing for Tricentis Tosca is extremely high, and I rate it as ten in terms of expense.
A yearly license costs around 20,000 euros.
For enterprise customers, the cost is manageable because it provides solutions for multiple applications they want to automate.
For the parts that have been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.
It allows for drag-and-drop functionality and demo automation in SAP-based applications, which can be challenging with other automation tools.
The features I find most valuable in Tricentis Tosca are that it's the easiest way to build the scripts and to do the CI/CD process; using Tricentis Tosca is very useful and easy.
The modular approach reduces scripting effort by at least fifty percent, which significantly cuts down on the script development time.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Tricentis Tosca | 17.1% |
| Qt Squish | 3.2% |
| Other | 79.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 24 |
| Large Enterprise | 72 |
Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.
Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.
Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.
What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
