We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiClient and GoodAccess based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The most valuable feature is the single pane of glass, single point of management."
"The setup for FortiClient is really straightforward."
"It is a scalable product."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to deploy. Deployment, configuration, and troubleshooting are very easy."
"The VPN connection is the feature that I like the most."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its integration capabilities. The processing is fast and the reporting is also very good."
"You can scale the product."
"It's very stable."
"The VPN's role in facilitating remote work has improved internal efficiency."
"The solution's robustness has meant that our team, regardless of where they're located, feels as though they're working right from the office, having secure and quick access to all essential tools."
"GoodAccess was the only hosted VPN solution we found for a reasonable cost that allowed us to establish a site-to-site VPN network for hundreds of locations across the country."
"The task of managing security and auditing for unauthorized entries has been substantially diminished."
"It has become an integral part of our remote work toolkit, as it enables us to overcome USA IP restrictions, ensuring our global teams can collaborate effectively."
"The solution has easy-to-use administration and offers an easy implementation."
"Static IP Addresses with multiple gateway options per team allow us to set up different teams with different network accesses."
"The dashboard is pretty sleek and complete."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The solution should have faster turnaround when it comes to new technology."
"FortiClient's encryption key could be stronger so that it's not broken too easily."
"The licensing feature of the product requires improvement since whenever the license expires, the tool logs out its users automatically, irrespective of whether they are on the network or not, which can be problematic for me."
"There should be more frequent releases or updates."
"It has a horrible performance. It is one of the most unstable VPNs I have ever used."
"I would like for the next release to be more user-friendly for users to do not have as much of a technical background."
"FortiClient is not communicating with the new version of the firewall."
"The solution has some issues with stability on the user side."
"They need to provide a more comprehensive app that shows more data that appears on the GoodAccess site."
"The logs do not go back very far."
"Currently, the pricing structure is functional yet could benefit from more refined scalability calculations."
"Adding one user at a time to the package as compared to blocks of five would be helpful. Currently, we end up with empty seats on our plans."
"For small organizations, it works great. However, the larger the organization, the more scalable the pricing model, the better, since gateways can be very expensive if an organization needs multiple gateways."
"I've found some bugs."
"There could be a better view of which type of communication is going through the system."
"It would be useful to see the weekly usage information within the program itself and a dashboard for all usage data."
Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 85 reviews while GoodAccess is ranked 10th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 19 reviews. Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0, while GoodAccess is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GoodAccess writes "Robust, allows for remote work, and has comprehensive support". Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Fortinet FortiEDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, whereas GoodAccess is most compared with . See our Fortinet FortiClient vs. GoodAccess report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
