

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Fortra's Digital Guardian are products competing in the data protection market. While Fortra's Digital Guardian has a slight feature advantage due to additional endpoint security, Forcepoint offers competitive pricing and robust support, appealing to budget-conscious buyers.
Features: Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention provides real-time threat protection, data classification, and identification of sensitive information across networks. Fortra's Digital Guardian delivers advanced endpoint protection, fine-grained control over data movement, and comprehensive security features that contribute to its feature-rich offerings.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Forcepoint offers a hybrid deployment model with efficient customer support, making onboarding seamless. Fortra's Digital Guardian features a cloud-centric deployment useful for cloud-based setups, though its comprehensive features require more setup time. Forcepoint is regarded as having more accessible and responsive customer service, benefiting user satisfaction during deployment.
Pricing and ROI: Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is attractive due to its budget-friendly setup costs, suitable for organizations with limited budgets. Despite higher initial expenses, Fortra's Digital Guardian is perceived as providing better ROI through its expansive feature set, appealing to those looking for long-term security investment returns.
I have seen a return on investment, and the biggest one is saving time.
It is reliable, it has a broad scope, and the vendor is easy to reach out to and makes it easy to request assistance.
It doesn't block my workflows, saving me from wasting hours of troubleshooting security blocks that could happen with other tools.
I see some return on investment with Fortra's Digital Guardian since the license is based on the endpoints, which is where you can save.
They conduct sessions to check logs and policies, unlike Symantec, where engineers may temporarily check and ask for logs, causing delays.
I expect that ticket alignment within Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention support should depend on the type of case, and that is not there.
We were very happy with the technical support engineers that are supporting us.
For others looking into using Fortra's Digital Guardian, I would suggest learning the steps for monitoring and maintaining the server, especially policy configuration, since it is quite tricky and includes a lot of processes.
Technical support from Fortra can vary; sometimes I encounter great engineers with high experience who can resolve issues quickly, but other times I face less experienced engineers which can cause delays in issue resolution.
I have never had to contact Fortra's Digital Guardian's customer support because the software has never crashed or caused any issues on my machine.
The key principle of a scalable DLP uses a single policy engine across multiple data channels such as endpoint, email, web, cloud, and network.
It is easily scalable because it is purely deployed on on-premises and with less downtime.
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention performs well in terms of scalability, as it can handle growth because the license is a trust-based license, so it will not block the growth.
Even when my laptop is under heavy load, running multiple instances of automated browsers via Selenium, PyCharm, and handling background API requests, the agent remains stable and completely unnoticeable.
While there are limits, we attempt to work around them, sometimes needing to collaborate with Fortra's Digital Guardian engineers to find solutions.
The stability of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is reliable, with minimum crashes, errors, or performance issues.
Fortra's Digital Guardian is stable; it doesn't have a negative effect on my system performance.
While Forcepoint is mostly on-premises, I suggest that to compete with Symantec, they should consider cloud solutions.
The AI component is missing in Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, where based on user behavior analytics, it could give us suggestions.
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is already capable enough to integrate with data classification tools such as Boldon James and Microsoft MIP.
System reporting and default system reporting are not totally usable and require customization to be practical.
Fortra's Digital Guardian does have some mishaps and imperfections, but it has been really helpful for us as a DLP tool.
I give Fortra's Digital Guardian a seven because it doesn't compromise my system performance, but I don't get any visibility about what's happening and I don't know which criteria are used for preventing data leaks or classifying my files as sensitive or not sensitive.
There have been situations where the license expired before the purchased license was sent, resulting in the DLP being out of service.
The pricing is reasonable and medium, not very low, but fair for the product offered.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is that the pricing was reasonable.
It provides multiple customization options for policies, which makes it superior to Symantec.
It supports 50 file types and continuously improves accuracy with user feedback, enabling auto-discovery across cloud, endpoint, and on-premises data stores without extra cost of repeated scans.
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention's email workflow checks whether emails sent from the office are forbidden by DLP rules and sends a notification to the manager accordingly.
Fortra's Digital Guardian can detect any user activity after installation and commissioning without the need for policy implementation; it just works by system default.
With this file tagging, everything that needs to be controlled or monitored is blocked for any file transfer because once the file is tagged by Fortra's Digital Guardian, that tag remains wherever the file is placed.
Fortra's Digital Guardian's lightweight nature impacts my productivity and workflow positively because it delivers enterprise security without hurting developer productivity, and the system performance remains stable.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention | 4.4% |
| Fortra's Digital Guardian | 1.3% |
| Other | 94.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 33 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) helps organizations prevent sensitive data loss across endpoints, AI interactions, web, cloud applications, email, and networks. Forcepoint provides unified policy management and consistent enforcement across channels, giving organizations visibility and control over sensitive data everywhere.
Forcepoint DLP simplifies deployment, policy management, and compliance with 1,800+ predefined classifiers and policy templates covering regulations across 90+ countries and major industries. Forcepoint Risk-Adaptive Protection continuously analyzes user behavior and risk to dynamically adjust DLP enforcement, helping organizations reduce data loss while minimizing unnecessary friction for users.
Forcepoint also uses AI to simplify DLP operations. ARIA, the Adaptive Risk Intelligence Assistant, helps security teams configure and deploy policies, investigate incidents, understand user risk, and surface data security insights using natural language. With unified policies, risk-adaptive enforcement, AI-assisted operations, and flexible on-premises, hybrid, and cloud deployment options, Forcepoint helps organizations protect sensitive data, streamline compliance, and modernize data security without adding unnecessary complexity.
Fortra's Digital Guardian is celebrated for its robust data protection, especially in data loss prevention across various endpoints. It enhances organizational efficiency, streamlines workflows, and provides deep insights via advanced analytics and real-time alerts, significantly improving data security and compliance management. Ideal for monitoring, customizing policies, and guarding against internal and external threats.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.