Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention comparison

Forcepoint and Broadcom are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Forcepoint is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2, while Broadcom is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6. Forcepoint holds a 5.1% mindshare in DLP, compared to Broadcom’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Forcepoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention are leading competitors in the data protection category. Symantec demonstrates an upper hand with its advanced machine learning features and network discovery capabilities, whereas Forcepoint excels in its robust integration and user-friendly interface.

Features: Symantec offers comprehensive data monitoring, endpoint protection, and strong network discovery. It utilizes machine learning for document classification and scanning accuracy. The software also integrates optical character recognition, ensuring effective data detection and response capabilities. Forcepoint is recognized for its customizable control systems, intuitive workflows, and excellent data detection across channels. Its AI-driven functionalities significantly enhance data classification and protection accuracy, making it compatible with various security solutions.

Room for Improvement: Symantec faces challenges with complicated installation procedures and dependence on Oracle databases, needing better integration with virtualization platforms. Users suggest improvements in machine learning stability and reporting, as well as a reduction in false positives. Forcepoint needs to enhance endpoint integration and simplify deployment processes. Users also report delays in support and highlight the need for expanded cloud capabilities and improved incident response.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec is generally deployed on-premises and requires substantial resources for efficient implementation. Customer service has been inconsistent post-Broadcom acquisition. Forcepoint provides varied deployment options, including hybrid and public cloud, offering great flexibility. However, setting up can be complex, with a notable need for better local support and faster response times.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec has a higher pricing structure owing to Oracle database licenses, which may be burdensome for smaller firms, but offers substantial ROI through effective data incident detection. Forcepoint is considered more competitively priced, with a standardized licensing model viewed as reasonable by customers. Though the initial costs may be higher, Forcepoint’s broad coverage and strong protection justify the expense. Users have noted the need for improved regional licensing management.

To learn more, read our detailed Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 892,943 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare One

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare One is 2.1%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is 5.1%, down from 10.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Data Loss Prevention is 4.0%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention	5.1%
Symantec Data Loss Prevention	4.0%
Cloudflare One	2.1%
Other	88.8%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Cobe Van Coller

Network Architect at IP Dimension

Cloud security has improved remote access and has reduced costs for smaller client sites

I have used Cloudflare One's Identity-Aware Proxy, and it is quite straightforward from what I have seen so far. The app registration on the Azure side integrates fully into Cloudflare, and I am very satisfied with that part because it is easy to set up. The integration of Cloudflare One's Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access works without any issues. That part is pretty automatic, and if you complete the rest of the setup, it comes together by itself with no issues from my side. What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection. The hops get shorter and you get better latency. We have done testing to see if it is better. One thing that we did notice with our proof of concept with our current client is that they have people connecting from the UK. When they used their previous VPN solution, uploading CAD drawings and other files to the server took a long time. They mentioned that it is much quicker on Cloudflare One's solution. I definitely believe that is part of the improved performance, and I am satisfied with that as well. What is nice about Cloudflare One is that it makes the setup easier and also easier to train technicians to maintain it. Compared to legacy systems, we do not need to get fancy firewalls in place that are costly. That is definitely also a cost-saver with Cloudflare One.

Read full review

MuhammadJunaid7

Data Security Specialist at BOK

Data protection and feature-rich capabilities have improved with room for reducing false positives

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is a good product that provides deep fingerprinting capabilities in data exploring and data discovery. They have an excellent feature for discovering data automatically through policies available in their portal, and they excel in data discovery and classification. The solution offers database fingerprinting, file fingerprinting, and script-based policies, along with automatic data discovery exploration. Fingerprinting automatically discovers customer data in our database and, based on sensitivity, detects and blocks the data if someone attempts unauthorized access. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is a web threat security product offering content inspection and URL filtering with built-in DLP capabilities. It proactively identifies web-based threats using tools such as advanced classification, browser isolation, and malware detection. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention's solution focuses on internal risks and monitoring user activity to identify abnormal behavior, offering forensic tools such as login and video replay to understand intent. Data classification is an advanced tool we have used for classifying our data. The main feature is AI-powered, called DSP. The classification capability leverages a distributed AI architecture feature and GenAI small language models to classify both structured and unstructured data. It supports 50 file types and continuously improves accuracy with user feedback, enabling auto-discovery across cloud, endpoint, and on-premises data stores without extra cost of repeated scans.

Read full review

OZGURTOSUN

Technical Team Leader at Redington (India) Ltd

Experienced implementation enhances security with robust detection and centralized management

A significant case highlighted an improvement need when a banking company lost 500 customer information pieces through screenshots. The data theft occurred through individual screenshots of credit note pages rather than taking complete PDF files. This incident led to the suggestion for implementing image detection methods, as Data Loss Prevention solutions needed to analyze image details. Symantec responded by creating an OCR module, enabling the capability to search within images. The pricing structure remains an area for improvement. We lost a POC despite installing 2,000 endpoints because Symantec Data Loss Prevention is more expensive compared to other solutions. Although the competing product couldn't match all the best practices, the price difference influenced the final decision.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We mostly use Cloudflare WAF, and gets basic Cloudflaire DDoS, caching as extra bonus . We like the factor these features are all integrated into 1 console, simple to manage."

"What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection."

"Cloudflare is simple to use."

"This solution is easy to understand and easy to configure."

"It is a stable solution."

"The simplicity of the solution is its valuable features as almost no effort was needed to learn the configurations. It is also one of the cheapest firewalls available in this category."

"Clover is the best product globally."

"The solution has different options that can be used to differentiate DDoS attacks."

More Cloudflare One pros

"I think it's the most cost-effective and affordable solution compared to other solutions that I have."

"The Optical Character Recognition (OCR) functionality is another helpful feature, especially for unstructured data. Being able to discover sensitive data in an unstructured format is the most beneficial element of the solution."

"Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention provides a greater sense of security regarding data leaving email accounts, particularly when emails contain secret files from employees."

"Forcepoint DLP has very good reporting whether it is at the gateway or it is the LP, and the product is user-friendly."

"The built-in rules, templates, and content classifiers are among the most valuable features. Some of the built-in patterns are good places to get started with. Along with the phrases, they are helpful in putting together policies and fine-tuning our policies."

"This solution is one hundred percent stable."

"Some good features are basically its UAV Analytics engine. And even fingerprinting is really good in Forcepoint."

"Technical support has been helpful."

More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention pros

"The data-at-rest features are the most valuable because they let us identify data infected with ransomware and prevent employees from being exploited through phishing attacks. If an employee is compromised, the attacker can access servers and deposit ransomware. This enables the attacker to exfiltrate data remotely using employees' credentials. It might be valuable data that could cause a business reputational and financial damage if stolen and publicized. It could also be credit card data or personal health information stored on critical servers."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is endpoint security."

"The data matching features are the most valuable due to the easy policy setup and implementation."

"The most valuable feature is the end point encryption and the solution provides good data loss prevention."

"Symantec Data Loss Prevention is the number one product in its field. It does its job well and it has all the necessary features. It is definitely better than any other solution on the market."

"All of the features are really important, including DLP for the OCR and endpoint. It will be all of the combined features that will give you the strength to control the data. Every feature has its own uniqueness, different control and will help you to protect the data."

"The product helps with blocking sensitive data transmission and permission management."

"Overall, it is an excellent product."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention pros

Cons

"The tool should provide on-premise versions. Currently, all versions are cloud-based."

"Feedback could be enhanced."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform needs to improve its documentation. It took time to do the implementation."

"Cloudflare One is not very powerful, but for what we require, it is basic and sufficient."

"Our customers no longer use Cloudflare because its service is subpar."

"The initial onboarding was causing us some confusion."

"From a logging perspective, it is still a bit difficult to see exactly what users are being blocked with the current views."

"When there are any dynamic changes in complex applications, the tool takes a lot of time, making its analytics-related area a major matter of concern where improvements are needed."

More Cloudflare One cons

"The main challenge is the solution's high cost. Additionally, there is no discount for bulk purchases, making it difficult to get budget approvals."

"Overall, Forcepoint support is not very good."

"We want to be able to do data classification better in the product and reduce false positives, especially on data loss prevention."

"There is no support for the Bangla (Bengali) language, so we cannot use the Forcepoint technology for Bangla documents."

"The APIs for device integration are limited, so that could be improved."

"With respect to the discovery component, the reports are very hard to interpret because they come out in an illogical format."

"They need to improve their reporting feature as well as the incident response."

"The reporting features, the real-time reporting, can be improved in Forcepoint. On the dashboard, we don't have a feature that shows real-time incidents."

More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention cons

"It's not a scalable product. It only works on the Windows platform."

"What could be improved in Symantec Data Loss Prevention is its security."

"Their support program needs a lot of improvement. If you are stuck somewhere, getting their support can be difficult."

"Reporting could be improved."

"I would like to see an improved interface, with better documentation and integration with other products."

"Unfortunately, it's pathetic, and that's the reason why I decided to stop using Symantec, and I'm going to find an alternative."

"There should be more information about the features of the solution and what they do. This way we would be able to use all the features that are available."

"Symantec Data Loss Prevention could improve by having better system resource management, cloud option, and more features."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The prices are slightly expensive."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good."

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. The licensing cost is also very low. I rate the cost and pricing a three out of ten."

"The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice."

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no hidden charges apart from the licensing costs of the solution."

"The solution's pricing lacks transparency."

"The solution is not that expensive."

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."

"Its pricing is quite low considering the features they are offering. As compared to other solutions, it is reasonable. They do have professional support. If we need professional support, then there will be additional costs."

"Forcepoint DLP is a bit expensive."

"They have to look at a different pricing structure for small to medium-sized enterprises because the cost is too high."

"Forcepoint has been very cost-effective because they gave us a good deal while procuring the DLP solution."

"Forcepoint offers a more cost-effective solution because everything, including OCR, is included in one package, unlike Symantec, where it is an add-on with an additional cost."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"They are flexible regarding the pricing and they have a good model for an OEM data classification tool... Forcepoint has been one of the most competitively priced products over the last few years."

"The pricing and licensing are okay."

More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

"The pricing and licensing are based on per user endpoints."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"The pricing is competitive and not pricey. We also receive corporate discounts."

"The product charges a little on the higher side."

"The platform is not very expensive. I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"The solution's pricing is based on a license model."

"In terms of pricing, Symantec DLP offers reasonable rates compared to other products like Forcepoint or Jargill, making it a good investment for ROI, typically seen within two years."

"The price of Symantec Data Loss Prevention could be reduced."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,943 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

21%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	28

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	28

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access has strong integration with Microsoft, among other platforms. However, when it comes to Kaspersky, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access provides secure access to internal applications for employees, external members of the organization...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access is one of the best integrations available. While about two hundred vendors offer similar services, ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention?

Regarding pricing and setup cost for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, I do not have any issues, but I do have concern...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention?

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is a most critical and complex solution because the deployment models include on-prem...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention?

In a banking environment, I have worked with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, integrating its features with web DLP s...

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Data Loss Prevention?

It can prevent copying and encoding of HTTP data to various sites like Google, and Webex.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Data Loss Prevention?

I am not aware of the licensing cost for Symantec Data Loss Prevention because the licensing cost is up to senior man...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Data Loss Prevention?

In future updates of Symantec Data Loss Prevention, I would like to see improvements based on the many attacks happen...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 5% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

FortiSASE vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Twingate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudflare One Competitors

Cyera vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Compared 10% of the time

Cyberhaven vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Compared 7% of the time

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Compared 6% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 11% of the time

Cyera vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 8% of the time

Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 7% of the time

GTB Technologies Inspector vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 7% of the time

Wave Systems Safend Data Protection Suite vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare One

May 2026

Download Cloudflare One product report

Buyer's Guide

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

May 2026

Download Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

April 2026

Download Symantec Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare Gateway, Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform

Forcepoint DLP, Forcepoint Data Security Suite, Websense Data Security Suite

Symantec DLP

Overview

Cloudflare One is a comprehensive platform for security, performance, and connectivity. It provides features like rate limiting, DDoS protection, and application access, tailored to enhance user experience while securing internet access and accelerating communications.

Designed to integrate security measures with ease of use and scalability, Cloudflare One offers a secure web gateway and zero trust network access. These features ensure seamless setup and operation, making connectivity reliable and protected. Users appreciate its integrated console, intuitive interface, and the ability to manage risk effectively. It offers straightforward deployment, improves latency, and boasts cost-effectiveness. While its onboarding process and documentation need enhancement, its value in content delivery and application shielding is notable. Despite challenges in integrating Cloudflare Access with existing VPNs and the need for better automation and support, it remains vital for DNS and infrastructure protection.

What features make Cloudflare One stand out?

Rate Limiting: Controls the traffic rate to prevent abuse.
DDoS Protection: Shields applications from distributed denial-of-service attacks.
Secure Web Gateway: Provides secure internet access with seamless operation.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure, application-based connectivity without relying on traditional VPNs.
Access for Connectivity: Facilitates access to internal applications securely.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Security: Robust measures for DNS and browsing protection.
Performance: Enhanced site accessibility and communication speed.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing for its features.
Ease of Deployment: Straightforward and efficient setup process.

In industries like finance, retail, and technology, Cloudflare One is crucial for enabling secure remote access and protecting web applications against dynamic threats. It supports compliance access policies and enhances content delivery, playing a key role in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Cloudflare

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive data everywhere it resides and moves, across endpoints, cloud apps, web, email, and on-premises environments. It delivers unified policies and centralized visibility to simplify compliance and prevent data breaches in real time.

With over 1,800 pre-defined templates, policies, and classifiers covering the regulatory requirements of 90+ countries and 160+ regions, Forcepoint DLP accelerates deployment and ensures precise protection of regulated and sensitive data.

Flexible deployment options let organizations protect data on-premises, in the cloud, or through a hybrid approach using the same unified console. Powered by AI-driven classification and Risk-Adaptive Protection (RAP), Forcepoint DLP reduces complexity, automates compliance, and safeguards data wherever work happens.

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is equipped with advanced fingerprinting technology, optical character recognition, and a large library of predefined rules. Organizations gain comprehensive data visibility and effective policy enforcement, supported by dynamic user behavior analysis and compliance capabilities. Its intuitive interface and flexible deployment options position it as a top choice for data security, although it could improve in communication reliability and language support. Complex reporting, machine learning integration, and cross-platform compatibility require enhancements.

What are the key features of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention?

Ease of Installation: Simplifies setup for quick deployment.
Extensive Templates: Provides a wide range of compliance templates.
Powerful Fingerprinting: Offers robust data protection through precise identification.
Detailed Reporting: Generates comprehensive data movement reports.
Customizable Rules: Allows tailored data protection policies.
Cloud Integration: Seamlessly connects to cloud environments.
Optical Character Recognition (OCR): Reads text in images for data security.
Risk Analysis: Assesses risks to enhance data protection strategies.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from reviews?

Data Protection: Safeguards sensitive information effectively.
Regulatory Compliance: Helps meet legal requirements like PCI.
Data Visibility: Provides clear insights into data movement.
Integrated Security: Works smoothly with existing security tools.
Behavior Analysis: Offers insights into end-user actions.

In industries like finance, legal, and healthcare, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is implemented to protect sensitive data such as credit card information and personal identification. It monitors and controls data on networks, endpoints, and cloud services, detecting unauthorized transfers through features like OCR and fingerprinting.

Forcepoint

Symantec Data Loss Prevention provides comprehensive coverage across networks and endpoints with centralized management and advanced policy capabilities, ensuring robust data protection and compliance.

Symantec Data Loss Prevention delivers a wide range of advanced features aimed at safeguarding data from unauthorized access and preventing data leakage across endpoints, emails, and networks. It offers comprehensive data classification, detection with high accuracy, and smooth integration with encryption tools. The centralized management console and enterprise-level segmentation facilitate seamless data security management across diverse environments. However, enhancements are needed in user-friendliness, system integration, and setup complexity. Dependency on Oracle databases increases costs, and improvements in reporting, management console usability, false positive reduction, and endpoint OCR functionality are advised.

What are the key features of Symantec Data Loss Prevention?

Network and Endpoint Coverage: Ensures data security across all channels with consistent policies.
Advanced Policy Management: Allows application of a single policy for all platforms.
Data Classification: Robust methods classify sensitive data efficiently.
Detection Accuracy: Exceptional precision in identifying data threats.
OCR Capabilities: Noteworthy optical character recognition for document analysis.
Centralized Management: Unified console for streamlined data protection administration.
Machine Learning: Utilizes AI for enhanced threat detection.

What benefits should users expect from Symantec Data Loss Prevention?

Data Security: Protects sensitive data from unauthorized access.
Compliance Assurance: Supports regulatory and industry compliance requirements.
Customizable Reporting: Tailored reports for specific organizational needs.
Efficient Monitoring: Enables thorough monitoring and policy enforcement.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with existing encryption solutions.

Finance and telecom industries specifically implement Symantec Data Loss Prevention to secure sensitive information and protect intellectual property. It aids in addressing internal security concerns, ensuring compliance, and adapting to complex environments through content discovery and policy enforcement.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

23andMe

Alphawest, Betsson, Cellcom Israel Ltd., Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, Confartigianato Vicenza, EverBank, Finansbank, iGATE, Landa Digital Printing, Northern California Bank, Reliance Capital, Remosa, Toyota, Scavolini, Zim Integrated Shipping Services

Hadassah University Hospital, Her Majestys Government (HMG), United Kingdom, Hitachi Consulting Software Services India Pvt Ltd., Hua Nan Bank, Hyundai Department Store Group,JW Marriott Hotel Seoul, Lake Health, McCann Erickson Israel, Molina Healthcare Inc., PGi, Quilvest Switzerland Limited, State of Nevada Public Employees Benefits Program, Symantec Corporation (Enterprise Security), The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust (DLP), The Saudi Industrial Property Authority, TSO cloud, Visa, Yunnan Power Grid Company

Buyer's Guide

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention

April 2026

Free Report: Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,943 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.