Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention compete in the data loss prevention category. Forcepoint seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive features and granular control.
Features: Forcepoint offers robust integration capabilities, advanced reporting mechanisms, and unique fingerprinting technology. Its multi-layer protection covers endpoints, network, and cloud, and it provides deep analytics for precise policy control. Microsoft Purview, meanwhile, integrates seamlessly within Microsoft services, features automatic labeling of data, and offers real-time compliance suggestions, ideal for Microsoft-centric environments.
Room for Improvement: Forcepoint faces deployment complexity, especially in on-premises setups, and needs improved agent communication and local language support. Users also seek more efficient policy deployment. Microsoft Purview requires enhancements in endpoint features, more precise incident handling, and better data classification in non-Microsoft environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Forcepoint provides comprehensive on-premises deployment options that are sometimes complex, and technical support can be slow in some areas. It offers strong data control. Microsoft Purview is streamlined for cloud environments and integrates well with Microsoft products, but users face challenges with incident response.
Pricing and ROI: Forcepoint has diverse pricing options, which can be costly for smaller businesses. Its market presence and features offer significant ROI. Microsoft Purview's pricing is part of Microsoft 365 packages, such as the E5 license, offering cost-effective solutions through existing Microsoft infrastructure integration for larger organizations.
