Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Trellix DLP comparison

"The solution’s content classification is the best."

"We don't require a lot of downtime, but when we do then we are getting proper support with no issue."

"Forcepoint offers many policies that conform to global DLP best practices, including requirements specific to regions like the Middle East, Europe, etc. They have a policy database in their product. That feature is unique to Forcepoint. Their AI and fingerprinting are incredibly effective and robust. We have tested it multiple times. It always catches the correct data being leaked."

"The GUI is very intuitive. That is the way I would explain its ease of use. It is straightforward."

"The product's configuration phase is easy."

"I did not experience any crashes. The solution has been stable in my usage."

"This solution has a great encryption feature."

"Technical support has been helpful."

"Trellix can transfer the data through the cloud. The storage device control is an important feature."

"The most effective aspect of Trellix DLP is that it does what it's supposed to do."

"I am satisfied with stability as there are not any latencies."

"The solution involves implementing the confidentiality, utility, and availability principles."

"The tool has prebuilt templates for data classification. It is easier for customers to get started."

"Scalability is feasible since it's on-premises. It's easy to scale there."

"Trellix DLP offers many features, using EDR, EPP, disk encryption, and other features."

"I rate the product an eight out of ten."

"I can't push a report by a certain organizational entity or unit without a lot of work. The reporting could be better."

"Everything can be improved and maybe there is a way to improve the user experience through the interface."

"Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention can improve by having an uninstall option for the client or restart of a client agent can be controlled from the server. This feature is missing which is available with other solutions."

"It would be better if we could easily integrate with other products. Suppose I want to integrate this DLP with some other CASB solutions or a firewall solution. In that case, it takes a considerable amount of time because Forcepoint DLP doesn't come with a legacy firewall or CASB solutions to integrate with it. We need to do it separately. It's not improvised for different sectors, and I need to look for other solutions. I'm investing a lot of time researching and implementing other solutions for other areas. That is one point where I can't feel satisfied with this Forcepoint DLP. The only problem we have faced is that it consumes most of the CPU whenever a Forcepoint DLP is deployed on an endpoint. This is when users feel some lag in their machine's performance or their Internet performance. That's when we uninstall and try to reinstall, or we'll give a cloud link to which it gets access. We use Forcepoint DLP for endpoint protection, not for email or cloud. For email and drive, we went with the Google DLP. Forcepoint DLP isn't as efficient on drive or chat, or email. For that, we have some specialized solutions, but it would be better to have a single console where you can control all these areas. It would be pretty easy for a consumer who is going to use this product. All in one shot, you can try to track it and enforce your policies on a single dashboard. That is one point currently lacking in Forcepoint, and I feel they need to work on it. In the next release, I would like to use this DLP across different solutions like network, firewall, email, or chat with a consolidated dashboard and with integration facilities with other solutions. Security should work as a whole. It shouldn't work individually in blocks. It does not serve our purpose. It should be integrated with multiple solutions. For that, it should have enough intelligence to work with other tools. I'm looking forward to seeing that kind of capability with Forcepoint."

"They need to improve their reporting feature as well as the incident response."

"The solution lacks sufficient customization."

"The deployment can be difficult."

"I am really impressed by the interface and management console but the requirements are very high and the response time is too slow."

"I would rate the solution seven out of ten based on my last experience within the last six months. It's a bit of a fallback, and I know they are working on improving scalability."

"Coverage for Mac OS is lacking as features like clipboard and print protection don't function as expected."

"Virtualization is complex and requires proper training. However, once you get trained, it is a very good product."

"Trellix needs to improve customer support."

"It's not very user-friendly for a beginner, so it would be easier if the platform or console were manageable or user-friendly. The dashboard could be simplified."

"In future releases, I would like to see like to see encryption available on the cloud-based version."

"When cases are raised, partners perform initial L1 or L2 troubleshooting. However, ticket resolution times are often too long, with new engineers sometimes requesting the same logs repeatedly."

"Coverage for Mac OS is lacking as features like clipboard and print protection don't function as expected. The agents often affect endpoint performance negatively and do not behave consistently across all machines."

"They have to look at a different pricing structure for small to medium-sized enterprises because the cost is too high."

"Forcepoint has been very cost-effective because they gave us a good deal while procuring the DLP solution."

"Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is costlier than other brands, but not all. Of the solutions, I have used Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is more costly."

"The pricing and licensing are okay."

"The pricing is reasonable. That's why we went with Forcepoint. They were pretty competitive."

"Its pricing is quite low considering the features they are offering. As compared to other solutions, it is reasonable. They do have professional support. If we need professional support, then there will be additional costs."

"The pricing for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is more expensive than Symantec, but it's negotiable. It depends on how well you negotiate. The solution is worth the money, though, based on the services and facilities it provides to my company."

"Pricing for this solution could be better."

"The pricing depends on the number of users in a company."