We performed a comparison between ESET Cloud Apps Protection and Microsoft Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Patch Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are the precision of detection and the level of customization of the policy."
"We are close to having 99% or 98% detection."
"Patching is the main feature because SCCM is made to control the entire environment without manually interpreting. So it is good to use for patching."
"I like a lot of the reporting capabilities and baseline configurations."
"The product is very stable compared to older versions."
"It is a very good solution. It has a good interface and is easy to use. On top of that, it is very reliable in terms of distribution as well as getting the report."
"It is easy to install, and quick to deploy."
"This solution has made life easy with respect to patching, compliance, and OSD."
"The scalability to deploy the package."
"It is a good choice for deployment that performs very well."
"It's not easy for an admin to check and decide if the email is good or not."
"The specific domain file for Apache needs to be well-defined."
"Microsoft should extend support for additional platforms."
"The setup was complex and I faced a lot of problems initially because I was new to the solution."
"Built in PowerShell cmdlets would be a nice feature because managing clients remotely can be a pain without knowing the WMI calls to run."
"I want the system to provide some dependency relations. I would also like to see the relationship between different machines."
"The product needs to improve scalability."
"The assets have reached their end-of-life, and patching them is a complex and laborious task. It would be highly advantageous if there were an integrated solution that provided distinct options for each end-of-life asset, streamlining the process and facilitating comprehension."
"The database should be made to be more stable and robust, but not so much the configuration."
"Management of Linux devices could be improved."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
ESET Cloud Apps Protection is ranked 16th in Patch Management with 2 reviews while Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 1st in Patch Management with 78 reviews. ESET Cloud Apps Protection is rated 9.6, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ESET Cloud Apps Protection writes "Great protection, good privacy, and helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". ESET Cloud Apps Protection is most compared with Fortinet FortiMail and Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP), whereas Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune, BigFix and Tanium. See our ESET Cloud Apps Protection vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.