ElectroNeek vs Jiffy.ai Automate comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ElectroNeek Logo
1,475 views|591 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
JIFFY.ai Logo
643 views|321 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ElectroNeek and Jiffy.ai Automate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Microsoft, Automation Anywhere and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA).
To learn more, read our detailed Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product's setup is straightforward.""The product's initial setup phase was easy.""The most valuable feature is the price.""The cost is the best thing about ElectroNeek.""ElectroNeek was extremely easy to use, especially its UI was easy to navigate with limited training.""My favorite feature is that you can have unlimited bots without having to buy more licenses. That's a powerful option for scalability.""We find the OCR feature very valuable, due to the corrector recognition that it provides; this is very useful for document processing.""The drag and drop feature, which is no code, is very useful for me because I am not a technical person. It is very user-friendly."

More ElectroNeek Pros →

"It is a one stop solution for automating process. The modular way that is assigned and works together follows a certain logic, and it encompasses a wide range of processes in a very structured and logical manner.""The most valuable feature is the computer vision or OCR. That has a lot of use cases in real life. A lot of man hours can be saved, as we've seen in the finance processes... The feedback I have gotten from the team is that the OCR is quite powerful.""It removes the burden of having to do some tasks manually. However, we are just using it in production for a single project. It saves us a lot of time in terms of extracting that information. So far, it has made a big impact.""Its initial setup process was quite efficient.""The way Jiffy.ai integrates into existing infrastructure has been great for us. Our company is pretty stringent when it comes to cyber security and integrating with our apps... We've definitely had very strong scrutiny over this platform and this work, and even within that, it's been really successful at being able to integrate.""With the customization option, we can write custom expressions using its compatibility with Python or other programming languages.""I found the invoice data extraction very exciting. It is really good.""The biggest driver was the cost savings. We wanted to improve productivity and save costs. Therefore, we gave most of the mundane tasks currently being done by a human to a bot. Some of the mundane tasks were reading invoices and keying in the data. We are talking about 15,000 documents every day. That is a huge volume that needs a lot of people. With the bot, it is just a fraction of the cost, because there is a huge savings in terms of manpower."

More Jiffy.ai Automate Pros →

Cons
"Its price could definitely be lower.""The solution needs to improve its stability.""The solution works well with Google Chrome, but not with Microsoft Edge, which is the browser we use for automation.""It's not applicable to very large enterprises and for difficult work or more complex processes.""When I wanted to use web scraping for tables in web applications, I found through online forums that such functionality or activity is currently not working as it shows.""ElectroNeek comes with three activities and we cannot add activities like we can with uiPADs.""I think that this solution could improve remote desktop interactions.""The integrating capability of the product needs to be improved, to ensure that it works with all systems involved in a process."

More ElectroNeek Cons →

"When using UiPath automation, we could just Google issues if we were stuck with something. In the initial days with Jiffy.ai, we could not get that type of information from Google because there wasn't much of a community.""I believe this is also being addressed, but a lot of the platform work, as we were putting in new versions or making some updates, was, ironically, very manual. It's improved greatly, but I would imagine that's an area that they're probably still working on, on the backend, to help when it comes to what we need to do for platform support.""The UI or the UX has room for improvement. The approach for designing the workflow is not that straightforward. It's quite difficult.""They are still new in the market. Or, at least, they are still a small player. They require a lot of improvement in terms of learning material as well as the community developers. If you compare Jiffy.ai to an established solution, like UiPath, you can go to YouTube and find a lot of learning material posted by UiPath, partners, and other people in the community. However, for Jiffy.ai, you won't find that available in the market. Because of this it is very hard for us to find talent in the market. Most of the developers in the market are used to the bigger players. For Jiffy.ai, if you search a resume because you are trying to find someone who has used Jiffy.ai, you won't be able to find it. So, when we onboard a new person, we want them to learn this new system, but it is a bit hard for them to pick up because there are no external learning materials on the Internet.""The solution's support services need improvement.""The solution has just not closed the gap of being accessible to non-IT users. If you are a non-IT person, then this all looks like gobbledygook. Maybe that is something that can be improved upon.""The setup process could definitely be better.""Initially, in version 3, Jiffy.ai did not have support for containerization. In our environment, we are heavy users of containers and container illustrators. So, the initial deployment option was running based on individual hosts that we deployed in the cloud. That created a singularity in the way that we deployed services in our system."

More Jiffy.ai Automate Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's very affordable and the licensing is billed on a yearly basis."
  • "Its price could definitely be lower. Its licensing is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost to the standard licensing fees."
  • "I believe we had a Silver Membership or something similar annually."
  • "I give the price an eight out of ten."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a seven."
  • "My company has made a payment towards the purchase of a license from ElectorNeek."
  • More ElectroNeek Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing and license make sense. They have a model based on the concurrency of the workforce, which is very suitable in our case. The savings are great on the licensing cost."
  • "The licensing is not expensive; it is quite cheap. The expensive part is to support and maintain it. Understandably, we engage them to do a lot of work that could have been done by our own staff, if we had an RPA team. I wouldn't hold that against them. It is just that the cost of support is on the higher side for us."
  • "I like that it is very cost-efficient."
  • "If cost is of concern, then start with Jiffy. If cost is not your main concern there are a few premium products out there, but they come with a huge price tag."
  • "The pricing is quite competitive. As a small player in the market, they are quite aggressive in their pricing. With the features that they offer, it is quite worth the value."
  • "Its license is yearly. There are no additional costs to the standard fee. It is a standard license."
  • "The solution's price is reasonable."
  • More Jiffy.ai Automate Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Yea there are. For example Electroneek. 
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase was easy.
    Top Answer:My company has made a payment towards the purchase of a license from ElectorNeek.
    Top Answer:Its initial setup process was quite efficient.
    Top Answer:The solution's price is reasonable in terms of its performance. The licensing costs approximately $10,000 per year. There are no additional costs involved.
    Top Answer:The solution's support services need improvement.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,475
    Comparisons
    591
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    410
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    643
    Comparisons
    321
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    385
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ElectroNeek RPA
    Learn More
    JIFFY.ai
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    ElectroNeek is an Intelligent Automation Platform transforming business process management in enterprises by integrating AI bots with employee workflows, automating routines, and helping humans to focus on more creative and strategic tasks. ElectroNeek provides a wide range of exciting low-code automation tools based on RPA, IDP, AI and GPT-4 (Conversational and Generative) technologies.

    Founded with the mission to radically change how enterprises automate complex business processes, JIFFY.ai puts the power of real-time innovation in business users’ hands. JIFFY.ai delivers an app-based, cognitive automation platform that includes capabilities ranging from intelligent document processing, natural language processing capabilities, RPA and Low Code/No Code development.
    Sample Customers
    UFP, Clariant, Ricoh, FMBCapital, RePower
    Southwest Airlines
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Outsourcing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    REVIEWERS
    Transportation Company43%
    International Affairs Institute29%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Transportation Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise51%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Microsoft, Automation Anywhere and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA). Updated: April 2024.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ElectroNeek is ranked 20th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 9 reviews while Jiffy.ai Automate is ranked 24th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 8 reviews. ElectroNeek is rated 7.4, while Jiffy.ai Automate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ElectroNeek writes "User-friendly, good UI, but does not work well with Microsoft Edge". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jiffy.ai Automate writes "The willingness to partner with us and understand our needs was key, as are the time and cost savings from automation". ElectroNeek is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA) and Robocorp, whereas Jiffy.ai Automate is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, Kryon RPA, UiPath and Automation Anywhere (AA).

    See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

    We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.