ElectroNeek vs Jiffy.ai Automate comparison

ElectroNeek and JIFFY.ai are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. ElectroNeek is ranked #37, while JIFFY.ai is ranked #38. ElectroNeek holds a 0.7% mindshare in RPA, compared to JIFFY.ai’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of ElectroNeek users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of JIFFY.ai users who would recommend it.

ElectroNeek

Read 9 ElectroNeek reviews

897 Views
691 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Jiffy.ai Automate

Read 8 Jiffy.ai Automate reviews

632 Views
607 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

ElectroNeek

Jiffy.ai Automate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Jiffy.ai Automate and ElectroNeek compete in the automation software market, offering tools for efficient business processes. Jiffy.ai excels with its robust feature set and flexibility, while ElectroNeek is favored for its cost-effectiveness and scalability.

Features: Jiffy.ai Automate includes a powerful workflow engine, intelligent document processing, and seamless integration with multiple applications, making it highly adaptable. ElectroNeek offers unlimited bot deployment, a user-friendly interface, and extensive automation options at an affordable price point.

Room for Improvement: Jiffy.ai Automate initially needed better containerization, now resolved, but still struggles with limited external learning resources and skilled developer availability. ElectroNeek lacks custom activities addition and faces browser compatibility issues, affecting its use in different environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Jiffy.ai Automate and ElectroNeek support a variety of deployment options including on-premises and private cloud. Jiffy.ai is known for its responsive, client-focused service, while ElectroNeek's smaller support team can cause slower response times.

Pricing and ROI: Jiffy.ai Automate offers competitive pricing with significant licensing savings leading to high productivity and ROI, though it may have a higher initial cost. ElectroNeek stands out with its affordable licensing and scalable options, though some users find the initial setup fee high.

To learn more, read our detailed ElectroNeek vs. Jiffy.ai Automate Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ElectroNeek vs. Jiffy.ai Automate

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ElectroNeek

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

37th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (23rd)

Jiffy.ai Automate

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

38th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of ElectroNeek is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jiffy.ai Automate is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ElectroNeek	0.7%
Jiffy.ai Automate	0.8%
Other	98.5%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

Sarath Gopinathan Nair

RPA Developer at DigiStaff

User-friendly, good UI, but does not work well with Microsoft Edge

We use the solution to automate processes such as the pay slips within the consol portal The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID. The support is good. ElectroNeek has video recordings that enable us to easily automate tasks, and it includes a wide variety of activities. The…

Read full review

Reviewer92674

Head of RPA COE at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

You don't have to code; it is just drag and drop

They are still new in the market. Or, at least, they are still a small player. They require a lot of improvement in terms of learning material as well as the community developers. If you compare Jiffy.ai to an established solution, like UiPath, you can go to YouTube and find a lot of learning material posted by UiPath, partners, and other people in the community. However, for Jiffy.ai, you won't find that available in the market. Because of this it is very hard for us to find talent in the market. Most of the developers in the market are used to the bigger players. For Jiffy.ai, if you search a resume because you are trying to find someone who has used Jiffy.ai, you won't be able to find it. So, when we onboard a new person, we want them to learn this new system, but it is a bit hard for them to pick up because there are no external learning materials on the Internet. For training, they provide the foundation and advanced training. If you have other issues, they have a support portal, which shows a brief summary of the features. It's not very extensive, like Google Cloud Platform. Sometimes there are things that may not be available in the portal. While other products will also not have available the information in their portal, other people know it. So, you don't have in the community discussions about solutions to a problem that would not be available in the portal.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The cost is the best thing about ElectroNeek."

"My favorite feature is that you can have unlimited bots without having to buy more licenses. That's a powerful option for scalability."

"The drag and drop feature, which is no code, is very useful for me because I am not a technical person. It is very user-friendly."

"The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"We find the OCR feature very valuable, due to the corrector recognition that it provides; this is very useful for document processing."

"The most valuable feature is the price."

"ElectroNeek was extremely easy to use, especially its UI was easy to navigate with limited training."

More ElectroNeek pros

"It is a one stop solution for automating process. The modular way that is assigned and works together follows a certain logic, and it encompasses a wide range of processes in a very structured and logical manner."

"The biggest driver was the cost savings. We wanted to improve productivity and save costs. Therefore, we gave most of the mundane tasks currently being done by a human to a bot. Some of the mundane tasks were reading invoices and keying in the data. We are talking about 15,000 documents every day. That is a huge volume that needs a lot of people. With the bot, it is just a fraction of the cost, because there is a huge savings in terms of manpower."

"Its initial setup process was quite efficient."

"The most valuable feature is the computer vision or OCR. That has a lot of use cases in real life. A lot of man hours can be saved, as we've seen in the finance processes... The feedback I have gotten from the team is that the OCR is quite powerful."

"The way Jiffy.ai integrates into existing infrastructure has been great for us. Our company is pretty stringent when it comes to cyber security and integrating with our apps... We've definitely had very strong scrutiny over this platform and this work, and even within that, it's been really successful at being able to integrate."

"With the customization option, we can write custom expressions using its compatibility with Python or other programming languages."

"It removes the burden of having to do some tasks manually. However, we are just using it in production for a single project. It saves us a lot of time in terms of extracting that information. So far, it has made a big impact."

"I found the invoice data extraction very exciting. It is really good."

Cons

"The solution needs to improve its stability."

"When I wanted to use web scraping for tables in web applications, I found through online forums that such functionality or activity is currently not working as it shows."

"It's not applicable to very large enterprises and for difficult work or more complex processes."

"ElectroNeek comes with three activities and we cannot add activities like we can with uiPADs."

"The integrating capability of the product needs to be improved, to ensure that it works with all systems involved in a process."

"I think that this solution could improve remote desktop interactions."

"The pricing is an area with a shortcoming, and from an improvement perspective, it needs to be made cheaper."

"Its price could definitely be lower."

More ElectroNeek cons

"The solution's support services need improvement."

"When using UiPath automation, we could just Google issues if we were stuck with something. In the initial days with Jiffy.ai, we could not get that type of information from Google because there wasn't much of a community."

"They are still new in the market. Or, at least, they are still a small player. They require a lot of improvement in terms of learning material as well as the community developers. If you compare Jiffy.ai to an established solution, like UiPath, you can go to YouTube and find a lot of learning material posted by UiPath, partners, and other people in the community. However, for Jiffy.ai, you won't find that available in the market. Because of this it is very hard for us to find talent in the market. Most of the developers in the market are used to the bigger players. For Jiffy.ai, if you search a resume because you are trying to find someone who has used Jiffy.ai, you won't be able to find it. So, when we onboard a new person, we want them to learn this new system, but it is a bit hard for them to pick up because there are no external learning materials on the Internet."

"I believe this is also being addressed, but a lot of the platform work, as we were putting in new versions or making some updates, was, ironically, very manual. It's improved greatly, but I would imagine that's an area that they're probably still working on, on the backend, to help when it comes to what we need to do for platform support."

"The setup process could definitely be better."

"The UI or the UX has room for improvement. The approach for designing the workflow is not that straightforward. It's quite difficult."

"Initially, in version 3, Jiffy.ai did not have support for containerization. In our environment, we are heavy users of containers and container illustrators. So, the initial deployment option was running based on individual hosts that we deployed in the cloud. That created a singularity in the way that we deployed services in our system."

"The solution has just not closed the gap of being accessible to non-IT users. If you are a non-IT person, then this all looks like gobbledygook. Maybe that is something that can be improved upon."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company has made a payment towards the purchase of a license from ElectorNeek."

"Its price could definitely be lower. Its licensing is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost to the standard licensing fees."

"I give the price an eight out of ten."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a seven."

"It's very affordable and the licensing is billed on a yearly basis."

"I believe we had a Silver Membership or something similar annually."

"The pricing is quite competitive. As a small player in the market, they are quite aggressive in their pricing. With the features that they offer, it is quite worth the value."

"Its license is yearly. There are no additional costs to the standard fee. It is a standard license."

"If cost is of concern, then start with Jiffy. If cost is not your main concern there are a few premium products out there, but they come with a huge price tag."

"The pricing and license make sense. They have a model based on the concurrency of the workforce, which is very suitable in our case. The savings are great on the licensing cost."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"I like that it is very cost-efficient."

"The licensing is not expensive; it is quite cheap. The expensive part is to support and maintain it. Understandably, we engage them to do a lot of work that could have been done by our own staff, if we had an RPA team. I wouldn't hold that against them. It is just that the cost of support is on the higher side for us."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

RPA that Bots can run without centralized control?

Yea there are. For example Electroneek.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs ElectroNeek

Compared 38% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs ElectroNeek

Compared 22% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs ElectroNeek

Compared 14% of the time

Robocorp vs ElectroNeek

Compared 14% of the time

BotFarm vs ElectroNeek

Compared 13% of the time

More ElectroNeek Competitors

UiPath Platform vs Jiffy.ai Automate

Compared 25% of the time

Nintex RPA vs Jiffy.ai Automate

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Jiffy.ai Automate

Compared 16% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Jiffy.ai Automate

Compared 11% of the time

SAP Intelligent RPA vs Jiffy.ai Automate

Compared 11% of the time

More Jiffy.ai Automate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

December 2025

Download ElectroNeek product report

Buyer's Guide

Jiffy.ai Automate

January 2026

Download Jiffy.ai Automate product report

Also Known As

ElectroNeek RPA

No data available

Overview

ElectroNeek is an Intelligent Automation Platform transforming business process management in enterprises by integrating AI bots with employee workflows, automating routines, and helping humans to focus on more creative and strategic tasks. ElectroNeek provides a wide range of exciting low-code automation tools based on RPA, IDP, AI and GPT-4 (Conversational and Generative) technologies.

ElectroNeek

Founded with the mission to radically change how enterprises automate complex business processes, JIFFY.ai puts the power of real-time innovation in business users’ hands. JIFFY.ai delivers an app-based, cognitive automation platform that includes capabilities ranging from intelligent document processing, natural language processing capabilities, RPA and Low Code/No Code development.

JIFFY.ai

Sample Customers

UFP, Clariant, Ricoh, FMBCapital, RePower

Southwest Airlines

Buyer's Guide

ElectroNeek vs. Jiffy.ai Automate

December 2025

Free Report: ElectroNeek vs. Jiffy.ai Automate

Find out what your peers are saying about ElectroNeek vs. Jiffy.ai Automate and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ElectroNeek vs. Jiffy.ai Automate report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.