Trend Vision One Endpoint Security and Elastic Security are two competing endpoint security solutions. While users prefer Trend Vision One Endpoint Security for pricing and support, Elastic Security is regarded as superior due to its advanced features, which users find worth the cost.
Features: Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers comprehensive threat detection, automated response, and high efficiency in identifying and mitigating threats. Elastic Security provides robust search capabilities, extensive integrations, and detailed analytics, making it a favorite for data-driven environments.
Room for Improvement: Trend Vision One Endpoint Security needs better integration with third-party tools, a more streamlined management process, and improved reporting functionalities. Elastic Security should enhance reporting capabilities, reduce resource consumption, and further simplify the user interface.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. Elastic Security, though having extensive documentation, is more complex to deploy due to its advanced features and requires a steeper learning curve.
Pricing and ROI: Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and relatively quick ROI. Elastic Security, while more expensive, is seen as a worthwhile investment for its features, justifying the higher price according to users.
It does not require hefty security budgets and can be deployed for enterprise security effectively.
Most of the time when my team encounters issues, they receive responses within 24 hours.
Providing necessary assistance efficiently.
Their technical support deserves a rating of nine out of ten.
I have not needed much technical support except during the uninstallation issues, which took some time to resolve.
It allows us to think about specific use cases, such as gathering malicious IPs in a single view and analyzing threats based on geolocation.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is scalable and stable because we have been using it for more than five years.
In terms of stability, I would rate Elastic a solid eight out of ten.
CrowdStrike and Defender have more established threat intelligence integration due to having a larger client base.
My security testing team continuously reports vulnerabilities, and we have to fix and update the versions frequently.
Elastic Security consumes a lot of resources, requiring a substantial deployment setup.
We need more training resources for my team and I, such as developing labs and sessions to implement it more easily.
It supports Mac and is fully functional with that.
20% to 30% of endpoints faced difficulty in cleaning or uninstalling the software.
This is beneficial for SMEs as they do not need extensive budgets for security solutions.
The pricing is reasonable, especially for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), making it a viable option for businesses building their security infrastructure.
Elastic Security is considered cost-effective, especially at lower EPS levels.
The pricing is very high, despite the solution’s capabilities.
The platform provides more visibility and requires less effort in monitoring.
Elastic Security is as flexible and configurable as Microsoft Sentinel.
We require rapid processing speed for alerts and event data, and Elastic Security is very efficient at handling this level of data.
The integration of ML and AI provides complete visibility, suggests responses, detects threats, and includes integration into XDR, which covers email security, endpoint security, cloud security, among other aspects.
They are very aggressive for our program, so whenever we have any issue, we just lodge a call, and within 15 minutes, we get the engineer on a call or Webex call to resolve the issue for the solution.
The behavior analytics feature is very useful, and its threat detection based on AI is very strong.
Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.
Additional offerings and benefits:
Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security delivers comprehensive antivirus, data protection, and device management. It offers robust threat detection and is deployable on-premises or via the cloud, making it versatile for endpoint security across organizations.
Emphasizing reliable endpoint security, Trend Vision One guards workstations and servers with extended detection and response features. Its machine learning-driven threat detection offers protection from malware and viruses, including zero-day threats. With seamless updates and automation, it minimizes administrative burdens, making deployment efficient. Criticisms include high resource use during scans and integration complexities, with calls for improved data loss prevention and better encryption. Users see the need for enhanced Linux support and quicker security updates.
What features define Trend Vision One Endpoint Security?In the finance sector, Trend Vision One is implemented for robust data protection and regulatory compliance. Healthcare providers rely on it for protecting sensitive patient information from cyber threats. Retailers use it for safeguarding payment systems and customer data against breaches, ensuring uninterrupted business operations.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
