DX Performance Management vs Pico Corvil Analytics comparison

Broadcom and PICO are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #55 with an average rating of 8.5, while PICO is ranked #71. Broadcom holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to PICO’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PICO users who would recommend it.

DX Performance Management

Read 32 DX Performance Management reviews

778 Views
451 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Pico Corvil Analytics

Read 9 Pico Corvil Analytics reviews

1,247 Views
1,060 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX Performance Management

Pico Corvil Analytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Pico Corvil Analytics and DX Performance Management are competing products in network monitoring and analytics. DX Performance Management seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features.

Features: Pico Corvil Analytics offers real-time monitoring, precision in metrics, and advanced insights, while DX Performance Management provides holistic performance evaluations, built-in diagnostics, and predictive capabilities. DX's detailed operational assessments set it apart.

Room for Improvement: Pico Corvil Analytics could improve its deployment complexity and expand its feature set. Enhancing predictive capabilities could also benefit users. DX Performance Management may work on optimizing initial costs, improving metric precision, and simplifying certain diagnostic processes to enhance usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX Performance Management delivers a straightforward deployment model and robust support. Pico Corvil Analytics offers strong support but requires a more complex deployment process. DX Performance Management's simplicity in deployment provides an advantage for smoother implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Pico Corvil Analytics has a cost-effective setup, focusing on significant ROI with precise insights. DX Performance Management involves higher initial costs but offers greater ROI through enhanced operational efficiencies. While Pico Corvil is more budget-friendly initially, DX promises considerable long-term ROI with its expanded features.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Performance Management vs. Pico Corvil Analytics Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,785 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Performance Management

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

55th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure Capacity Planning (2nd), DX NetOps (2nd)

Pico Corvil Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

71st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Performance Management is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pico Corvil Analytics is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
DX Performance Management	0.3%
Pico Corvil Analytics	0.5%
Other	99.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sandip Kheni

Lead Developer at STL - Sterlite Technologies Limited

The vertical database loads faster than any other product available

We experience disconnections between the solutions own components. In the last five years, there have been many intermittent connection issues with the four components and we still don't know the reasons. The solution has issues when loading groups that have been created in the application interfaces. It would be nice to have a mobile application. In the current industry and technical word, the mobile phone is the only thing that is always in your hands. Other Broadcom products have mobile applications but the solution doesn't offer one. It would be great to view device parameters and view or download graphs from a mobile device.

Read full review

Ted Hruzd

Founder at AI Fit LLC

Helpful support agents, beneficial issue detection, and high availability

The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite. The product suite could benefit from more out-of-the-box predictive analytics capabilities, such as projecting market or symbol movements. However, it is unclear whether the vendor currently provides this functionality. Users may need to adjust their software to perform such analysis independently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When we deployed it, right out of the box we were able to stand up Performance Management within two weeks, in our production environment, with full discovery and relevant information, actual information, that we could use in our command center, our 24/7 operations center."

"The capability where not only the traditional SNMP information is captured but also the netflow data; who is consuming the data on the WAN, and voice-related information, is helpful. The voice quality makes it very easy for first- and second-line operators to see where the issue is, and who is impacted."

"We're able to present data from multiple back-end collection sources into a single dashboard for the users. So they don't have to go to multiple locations to get data about a particular item, or device."

"Downloads and records are the most valuable features."

"It can be easily integrated with other systems and is powerful enough to collect data from a large number of devices."

"We have been able to get a little bit better at seeing more things in real time and more just in time, so we're less reactionary."

"The ability to quickly do drag and drop customized reports for dashboards."

"It saves time having it all on one place, so you do not have to jump around from different tools and try to merge the data. It is already done for you."

More DX Performance Management pros

"The performance metrics are pretty good. We've got everything from the network layer to the actual application layer. We can see what's going on with things like sending time and batching."

"We like the dashboards because they essentially organize all the sessions into one viewpoint."

"It allows us to trace the flow. The logic is built sufficiently for us to be able to break down clients' orders, underlying child orders, and execution. Thus, it's a good way for us to trace client flow through a myriad of different internal systems."

"With the Corvil Stored Data Analyzer module, we can use it for test data or a set of production data to set up the configuration for latency setup, so we can use the fields to correlate messages."

"We use the data to analyze how much time we spend within the applications. Then, based on that, we are doing multiple analyses and types of investigations to work on reducing the amount of time spent on the latency, which helps our applications."

"We can use CLI with the UI for configuring the new monitoring system, which is good."

"It has all the decoders so it's capturing every network packet and it's decoding in real-time and it's giving us latency information in real-time... It's the real-time decoding and getting the latency information statistics that we find the most useful."

"What is most valuable is the ability to troubleshoot when a client complains of spikes in latencies. It gives us the ability to go granular, all the way down to looking at the network packets and analyze them."

More Pico Corvil Analytics pros

Cons

"This solution is not very scalable."

"I think it would be helpful having a more comprehensive set of certifications so that I could natively deploy devices to my environment and the tool would immediately recognize and immediately be able to provide relevant performance information without a lot of tuning on my part."

"This may be available by now but for server space, when it comes to the disk file system, I'd like to see that graphically represented, or the trend, rather than what I'm seeing now."

"Global synchronization errors. Sometimes it just doesn't finish in time due to the load."

"We experience disconnections between the solutions own components."

"Install is done as root, which is a security no-no, and the database IO requirements were not stated correctly, which lead to a year of instability."

"I'm not a fan of many extra features since they usually burden the software and reduce its reliability."

"It would be helpful if CA provided online training for its customers."

More DX Performance Management cons

"Overall, the Corvil device needs a little bit of training for people to handle it. If that could be reduced and made more user-friendly, more intuitive, it would be better."

"The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite."

"While the product is scalable, it's not easy to scale. It needs investment hardware and network bandwidth consideration. It's not something you can just do overnight."

"It's quite difficult to see, sometimes, how hard your Corvil is working. When we had a very busy feed that chucked out a lot of data it wasn't working very well on Corvil. We had to raise a case for it. It turned out to be that, in fact, we were overloading Corvil."

"The analytics feature is very nice, but it's mostly software. We are hoping that it could be embedded in ASICs, so it could be faster."

"Before I got the Corvil training... one thing that was not very efficient was that every time you had to create a new stream or a new session from within Corvil... you had to tell it what protocol the message is going to come through and how to correlate messages, etc... After I went for the training, they had already added these nice features in the 9.4 version where it could do auto-discovery... Based on the traffic that it has already seen, it could create sessions on the fly."

"In terms of performance analysis, if you really want to dig down into the minutiae and get statistics on the important things... that would be the only piece lacking because, in our environment, we have thousands and thousands of symbols. With the architecture that Corvil is built on, it's cumbersome."

"There is definitely room for improvement in the reporting. We've tried to use the reporting in Corvil but, to me, it feels like a bolt-on, like not a lot of thought has gone into it. The whole interface where you build reports and schedule them is very clunky."

More Pico Corvil Analytics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."

"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."

"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."

"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."

"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. "

"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."

"I like the way they've decoupled the hardware now... Everything's based on the licensing side now. The way they do the packs is fair. It's very flexible in that we're not charged per decoder, we're charged for a certain pack. Whether we use one decoder or 20 decoders, as long as they're in the same pack, there's no extra charge. Expensive but fair is how I'd summarize it."

"The pricing is very expensive. Corvil could work on the pricing."

"Corvil has reduced the time it takes us to isolate root causes."

"We bought a box from Corvil and it was $200,000 for one big CNE. Then there are obviously the recurring maintenance fees. The licensing is perpetual but the maintenance fees are not."

"As I am working more with Corvil, it looks like it is improving diagnostic times."

"It is pricey versus its competitors."

"Pico Corvil Analytics is expensive. There are several competitors in the market. Selling this solution to a trading firm might be challenging as there are several other solutions available that can perform basic similar operations, such as using Wireshark and Python scripts to obtain the required values. However, that does not nearly approach the comprehensive end-2-end automated depth of metrics and their correlations that Pico Corvil Analytics provides."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Educational Organization

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

52%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	25

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DX Performance Management?

The tool helps us understand network performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Performance Management?

The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?

Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management

Compared 24% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs DX Performance Management

Compared 24% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX Performance Management

Compared 22% of the time

SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer vs DX Performance Management

Compared 15% of the time

OmniPeek vs DX Performance Management

Compared 15% of the time

More DX Performance Management Competitors

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 22% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 17% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 15% of the time

Datadog vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 13% of the time

Alluvio AppResponse vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 12% of the time

More Pico Corvil Analytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management

October 2025

Download DX Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics

September 2025

Download Pico Corvil Analytics product report

Also Known As

CA Performance Management

Corvil

Overview

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

Broadcom

Corvil transforms Network Data with speed and precision into the powerful real-time truth. Corvil captures, decodes, reassembles, and enriches vast amounts of data in motion, adding analytics and making the resulting enriched data and IT Operations Analytics available to humans, machines and other systems.

PICO

Sample Customers

Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG

NASDAQ, Commerzbank, Pico Quantitative Trading, CME Group, Interactive Data, Tokyo Stock Exchange Inc.

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

September 2025

Free Report: DX Performance Management vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Performance Management vs. Pico Corvil Analytics and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Performance Management vs. Pico Corvil Analytics report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.