DX Performance Management vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM comparison

Broadcom and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #59 with an average rating of 8.5, while NETSCOUT is ranked #82. Broadcom holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

DX Performance Management

Read 32 DX Performance Management reviews

728 Views
437 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Read 3 NETSCOUT vSTREAM reviews

455 Views
414 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX Performance Management

NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

DX Performance Management and NETSCOUT vSTREAM compete in network performance management. DX Performance Management has an advantage in pricing and setup ease, while NETSCOUT vSTREAM excels in feature richness, offering better value through its comprehensive offerings.

Features: DX Performance Management offers detailed analytics, proactive monitoring for efficient resource allocation, and a user-friendly interface. NETSCOUT vSTREAM provides advanced threat detection, comprehensive visibility across hybrid cloud environments, and extensive integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: DX Performance Management could enhance security features, expand integration options, and provide deeper hybrid cloud visibility. NETSCOUT vSTREAM can improve ease of deployment, simplify its complex interface, and offer more competitive pricing packages.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX Performance Management facilitates a streamlined deployment process with responsive support, allowing quick integration into existing systems. NETSCOUT vSTREAM offers robust support but requires more time for deployment, reflecting its advanced feature set.

Pricing and ROI: DX Performance Management presents competitive pricing, leading to a quick ROI due to lower setup costs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM requires a higher initial investment, yet its extensive features justify the cost over time, providing significant returns.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Performance Management vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Performance Management

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

59th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure Capacity Planning (2nd), DX NetOps (2nd)

NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

82nd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Performance Management is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT vSTREAM is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sandip Kheni

Lead Developer at STL - Sterlite Technologies Limited

The vertical database loads faster than any other product available

We experience disconnections between the solutions own components. In the last five years, there have been many intermittent connection issues with the four components and we still don't know the reasons. The solution has issues when loading groups that have been created in the application interfaces. It would be nice to have a mobile application. In the current industry and technical word, the mobile phone is the only thing that is always in your hands. Other Broadcom products have mobile applications but the solution doesn't offer one. It would be great to view device parameters and view or download graphs from a mobile device.

Read full review

Keval Lodaya

Network Engineer at Inniti Network Solution

A user-friendly solution that is easy to install and improves visibility

I would like to see improvements made to the user guide. From my personal experience, it is helpful to see a list of steps describing what to do next in different situations. An example is what to do and what to back up in the case of certain types of failure. There are also cases where a customer can't understand specific features. Enhancements to the user guide would be helpful for this. More features for network fragmentation would be helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When devices are having performance issues, it proactively build dashboards which allow us to go and do health checks, and resolve problems before they become an issue."

"The out-of-the-box dashboards are valuable, in terms of being able to visualize performance data in ways that we haven't in the past."

"What is most useful is visibility."

"When we deployed it, right out of the box we were able to stand up Performance Management within two weeks, in our production environment, with full discovery and relevant information, actual information, that we could use in our command center, our 24/7 operations center."

"You can create intelligent alerts so you have enough time to replace the router or interface before it's full. The same is applicable for CBQoS channels."

"The most valuable feature of DX Performance Management is the quick way we can collect data without putting much effort. They have a lot of customization and features with the solution internally and out of the box. We can discover the device, and start collecting information. For example, if the device is available, we can receive the CPU and memory utilization, and the interface optimization is simple and very fast to implement."

"There is a good amount of vendor certification which comes with the product. That's all factory-loaded, no need to load any custom-made files. Most of the metrics are calibrated and captured from the devices based on the defaults available from vendor certification."

"Downloads and records are the most valuable features."

More DX Performance Management pros

"One of the valuable features is the packet decoding."

"vSTREAM gives us better visibility and reporting about our network infrastructure, allowing for cost-optimization."

Cons

"Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected."

"For CA PM, there should be a way of easily migrating the reports coming from eHealth going to CA Performance Center, since CA PC is replacing eHealth."

"It could be a little easier to integrate new metrics."

"This tool gathers so much data, which makes it hard to convert over. To upgrade it, you really need the solution backed up. That is the issue that we are facing right now."

"DX Performance Management should increase high availability. If one of my two data centers goes offline and the other is operational, I need a seamless transition from the primary to the secondary data center. It's crucial to maintain consistent monitoring of the devices during this transition. Therefore, I require continuous, 24/7 monitoring of my system using this tool."

"Install is done as root, which is a security no-no, and the database IO requirements were not stated correctly, which lead to a year of instability."

"This solution's implementation process could be quicker. They could also optimize the hardware requirements."

"Global synchronization errors. Sometimes it just doesn't finish in time due to the load."

More DX Performance Management cons

"I would like for it to have a smaller footprint of the virtual appliance and better performance."

"I would like to see improvements made to the user guide."

"Room for improvement exists in filtering in the packet decode."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."

"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."

"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."

"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. "

"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."

"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."

"Licensing is quite expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Energy/Utilities Company

13%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DX Performance Management?

The tool helps us understand network performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Performance Management?

The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?

Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management

Compared 31% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs DX Performance Management

Compared 25% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX Performance Management

Compared 24% of the time

OmniPeek vs DX Performance Management

Compared 20% of the time

More DX Performance Management Competitors

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Compared 100% of the time

More NETSCOUT vSTREAM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management

August 2025

Download DX Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

August 2025

Download NETSCOUT vSTREAM product report

Also Known As

CA Performance Management

vSTREAM

Overview

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

Broadcom

The vSTREAM virtual appliance complements existing Adaptive Session Intelligence (ASI)-based instrumentation to provide the same level of visibility within virtualized and cloud infrastructures that is already possible in physical environments. The vSTREAM virtual appliance is ideal for monitoring service-critical traffic running within virtualized or cloud infrastructures, either locally on a host or as an aggregation point for multiple hosts. With complete visibility across physical, virtual and cloud networks, the vSTREAM virtual appliance presents real-time views of end-to-end call trace data and network-wide KPIs, to protect the reliability and availability of networks and application services.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG

Metropolitan Police Agency, Banpara, PropertyRoom.com

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM

July 2025

Free Report: DX Performance Management vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Performance Management vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Performance Management vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.