Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dotcom-Monitor ServerView Monitoring vs Icinga comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dotcom-Monitor ServerView M...
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
93rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Icinga
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
29th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (24th), Server Monitoring (14th), Cloud Monitoring Software (24th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Dotcom-Monitor ServerView Monitoring is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Icinga is 2.1%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Icinga2.1%
Dotcom-Monitor ServerView Monitoring0.2%
Other97.7%
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Use Dotcom-Monitor ServerView Monitoring?
Leave a review
Harrison Bulley - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Infrastructure Engineer at Net Consulting
A stable, scalable and cost-effective solution that helps with inbuilt scripts for easy modification
I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
14%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Icinga?
It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low. If you want to include this product in the services you offer to your customers, the return on i...
What needs improvement with Icinga?
There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved. For instance, multi-tenancy for monitoring the virtual infrastructur...
What is your primary use case for Icinga?
We use Icinga as a monitoring solution to monitor customers' infrastructures. We work as a managed service provider, so we offer monitoring and many other services to our customers. So we use it in...
 

Also Known As

ServerView Monitoring
Icinga Cloud Monitoring
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Citrix, Aflac, COMCAST, Dish Network, Dell, Volvo, Xerox, American InterContinental University, UMASS, ITT Technical Institute, Roanoke College, Trinity International University
Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: January 2026.
881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.