DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

NETMONASTERY and One Identity are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. NETMONASTERY is ranked #22, while One Identity is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.2. NETMONASTERY holds a 1.7% mindshare in UBA, compared to One Identity’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of NETMONASTERY users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

DNIF HYPERCLOUD

Read 8 DNIF HYPERCLOUD reviews

923 Views
185 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Read 45 One Identity Safeguard reviews

3,728 Views
373 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

DNIF HYPERCLOUD

One Identity Safeguard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

One Identity Safeguard and DNIF HYPERCLOUD compete in the privileged access management and security data handling segment. One Identity Safeguard appears to have the upper hand with stronger session monitoring and detailed auditing capabilities, while DNIF HYPERCLOUD's strong point lies in its speed and data analysis, making it more suitable for rapid security data needs.

Features:One Identity Safeguard offers detailed session monitoring, recording, and privileged access management with transparent mode for privileged sessions. It boasts an extensive auditing framework and supports various protocols. DNIF HYPERCLOUD excels in data analysis with built-in threat-hunting features and user behavior analytics, providing rapid responses to security data. It is known for its efficient handling of large EPS (events per second).

Room for Improvement:One Identity Safeguard could enhance its transparent mode and streamline its system integration, with improvements needed in documentation and reporting. DNIF HYPERCLOUD faces challenges with its support structure and UI, and export limitations are noted. Enhancing its threat-hunting capabilities and overall ease of use would benefit users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:One Identity Safeguard primarily offers on-premises deployment with mixed reviews on customer service. Some users find support efficient, while others face delays. DNIF HYPERCLOUD, available on-premise and in various cloud environments, provides highly-rated technical support with quick response times.

Pricing and ROI:One Identity Safeguard is considered expensive but justified by its comprehensive features, offering strong ROI, especially in compliance and security enhancements. Its licensing is based on session and user numbers. DNIF HYPERCLOUD is more cost-effective, suitable for budget-conscious organizations, with flexible pricing based on log volume, delivering strong ROI in security data handling.

To learn more, read our detailed DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. One Identity Safeguard Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. One Identity Safeguard

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DNIF HYPERCLOUD

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

22nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (51st), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (55th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (29th)

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Privileged Access Management (PAM) (4th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of DNIF HYPERCLOUD is 1.7%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 2.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

Featured Reviews

Kishore Tiwari

Deputy General Manager - Information Security (Lead ISA) at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Development from open sources is very valuable but a huge infrastructure is required

The solution's command line should be simpler so that routine commands can be used. The search configuration is a bit different than other OEMs or SIEM solutions like ArcSight or QRadar that are easy to search because they operate similarly. The logic is there and the solution supplies a pretty good explanation. Basically, DNIF spelled out is the opposite of FIND. You have to find commands whenever you want to search something. For example, a highway gets you to your destination but there is an alternate way people don't yet know about. Gartner or Forrester haven't yet studied it. We were a bit nervous when we were trying to get familiar with the solution. We wondered if we could realize ROI because the commands and ways of pulling data were different to us. We raised a case with the support team and their professionals provided the needed support. The command line is user friendly once you understand it. If you need immediate use, then you might want to get assistance from someone who is well-versed in methods for using key patterns to find things. Lengthier files for threat hunting or analysis are needed. The correlation happens, but exporting a large number of files to abstract them is not possible. For example, I want to present raw data to management so I should be able to customize a date range in my query and download the files.

Read full review

Tor Nordhagen

Executive Director at Semaphore

Transparent mode for privileged sessions will greatly simplify our client's administrative situation

We're introducing the solution's transparent mode for privileged sessions. This is part of what the client hasn't used before. It will simplify their administrative situation greatly. So far, the rollout of this feature has been a seamless process, but we're still in the midst of rolling it out. The benefits will be on the risk side. Right now, the way accounts are managed, you don't necessarily know who is using an account. There's a shared admin account, and that's not a good thing. And those accounts are shared in wallets by several people. One of the real benefits of safeguarding here is that the client will have an absolute audit of who is using an administrative interface, whether it's server or network.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of EPS it can handle."

"The solution is quite stable and offers good performance. It also works on a virtual machine. We haven't found any issues with it so far. It's been reliable."

"The dashboard is helpful, and it creates visualizations to let staff review event data and identify patterns and anomalies."

"The User Behavior Analytics is a built-in threat-hunting feature. It detects and reports on any kind of malware or ransomware that enters the network."

"Great for scaling productivity for log monitoring purposes."

"The beauty of the solution is that you can develop infrastructure for a data lake using open sources that are separate from the licenses."

"Has a great search capability."

"I like the MITRE table, a feature I saw for the first time in the same solution. There was one MITRE tactic table, which can be used to identify threats if you have all kinds of rules enabled or if you have rules for all the tactics in the MITRE table. There are 14 tables in MITRE, and those 14 tables consist of multiple columns, tactics, and techniques. It was one of the first SIEM tools I saw that had that particular MITRE table. On that basis, you can create new rules and identify existing ones. At any point, if an alert is triggered, it will try to match it to any of those MITRE tactics. I liked that creating a workbook on MITRE business was straightforward. I also like that you can search using SQL or DQL."

More DNIF HYPERCLOUD pros

"The most valuable feature of One Identity Safeguard is the user-friendly interface."

"It is generally easy-to-use and install."

"I like the discovery functionality and the change password feature through the check-in. I also like the bulk import with the help of templates that come with it out of the box. With the help of these few features, my tasks are made easier."

"Safeguard can define and update processes and procedures into the security framework of a company, including mobile. It allows us to change the policies and configurations on a mass scale in regards to security."

"We use the solution’s Approval Anywhere feature which enables us to add an extra layer of security for critical passwords without adding time-consuming approval processes. By using this platform, if someone goes on a vacation, out of office, or needs urgent/planned leave, then our setup will select the functions tied to that person and automatically delegate them to the next person. That person can start performing that duty based on their access. No sharing of passwords is required."

"Safeguard has the ability to record and retrieve in the full-video format."

"There are numerous valuable data protection features, including the content and information that offer us more scalable protection as needed."

"We use the Approval Anywhere, or cloud assistant feature and it is great. It enables us to add an extra layer of security for critical passwords without adding time to the approval process."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

Cons

"The solution should be able to connect to endpoints, such as desktops and laptops... If this solution had a smart connector to these logs- Windows, Linux, or any other logs - without affecting the performance of the connector, that would be wonderful."

"There are currently some issues with machine learning plug-ins."

"I feel that DNIF needs to invest more in marketing, considering that it operates at a very competitive speed."

"Dependency on the DNIF support team was frustrating."

"I think DNIF HYPERCLOUD can implement the ability to export more than 100,000. At the moment, we can't go beyond that. So many times, if you're checking for the firewall logs and working on something related to authentication or network-related traffic, while that log count is low, the account goes beyond that. You can't restrict the logs or the amount of data you can export. It's very important for my situation. It would be better if they could increase the capacity of exports. Although there are many more types of searching in DNIF HYPERCLOUD, people still struggle to query out what they want because not everyone is good at SQL or DQL. The easiest way to query out in DNIF is using the GUI-based interface. But in the GUI interface, you can use operator calls. It gets tricky when you want to search for a specific type of event. You don't know where it will be passed and whether it will be consistent. In the initial phase, it's tough for us to use DNIF. You cannot pass every event in a stable DNIF. When we used that particular tool, we used to get those logs, but sometimes many things are not getting passed. So, we used to export the sheet or export the data into Excel and weigh the required details. In the next release, I would like them to improve the export of the columns and make the application more user-friendly. I would also like a threat-hunting feature in the next release."

"The EBA could be improved."

"The vendor is fairly new and it's not as big as some of the international competitors. It's not a mature product. If you ask them to move data, it might take a lot of time."

"The solution's command line should be simpler so that routine commands can be used."

"We would like to be able to generate certificate signing requests (CSRs) from the interface for certificates."

"We sometimes face issues with configuration and things like that, but we manage to solve them."

"We would like to have the option of importing assets by using the CSV file. It was available in the earlier versions, but it is not available now."

"Cost-wise, it is a little bit expensive, which makes it difficult to get management approval. Its price should be reduced."

"Transparent mode was too cumbersome, so I don't foresee us being able to use it. On paper when we were initially talking about it, it was definitely going to be the preferred method until we realized the burden it would be on our network guys. Then, we had to step back and reevaluate what we wanted to do. That's when we changed our approach to use the RD Gateway feature."

"The deployment affects our privileged users because it takes a long time for them to request privileges, which impacts the SLA."

"I rate customer support six out of ten. It needs improvement as it can significantly impact customer access."

"Even though we have two nodes, there's no way to do an upgrade without taking everything completely offline. It would be nice if they could improve that."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price-wise, the product is quite economical. I rate the solution's price as three or four on a scale of one to ten, where one is considered to be a very economically priced tool."

"The solution requires a huge infrastructure and that is costly."

"The pricing is based on the log size."

"It is more expensive than Secret Server but way less expensive than CyberArk. As a customer, I would like the pricing to be lower, but it has a good price point."

"We bought their other products, so it was not that expensive. It is one of those where the more you buy, the cheaper it is."

"They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base."

"The license is very expensive for us, partly due to inflation and partly because of the exchange rate between the Dollar and the Iranian Rial. We purchased a perpetual license that we've been using up until now, but I believe that we are not going to update it in the future. Instead, we plan to find another third-party to support us with the license, in the sense that we would have access to their license as a shared agreement."

"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."

"We have a yearly license. The cost depends on how much a company wants to invest in technology. In our organization, we believe in modern digitization and automation processes so we found it affordable. One Identity was not that much less than other solutions and it is not a cheap solution. There were number of cheaper solutions. However, it's the most effective, according to our evaluation."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"The license is around $3,000 per month."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Transportation Company

10%

Media Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with DNIF HYPERCLOUD?

A lot of people don't know about DNIF HYPERCLOUD, but they do know about products like Splunk, QRadar, ArcSight, and some other SIEM solutions. DNIF is not a known name in the market. From an impro...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DNIF HYPERCLOUD?

DNIF HYPERCLOUD is a good SIEM solution. One of the tools' features is very high scalability in terms of the events generated per second. The product is aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework....

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering DNIF HYPERCLOUD?

The tool's ability in the area of its analytic capabilities has enhanced our company's security poster in a good way, especially when compared to some of the other competitors in the market, like S...

See all answers

What do you like most about One Identity Safeguard?

The identity discovery is good, and the performance is pretty good value.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

The pricing of One Identity Safeguard is fairly priced and cheaper than other solutions of the same enterprise level. It provides a good cost-benefit ratio.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

There is room for improvement in integration between modules. The native integration between SPP and SPS, which is currently based on a plugin, could be enhanced. Customization for lookup passwords...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD

Compared 34% of the time

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD

Compared 18% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD

Compared 13% of the time

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD

Compared 13% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD

Compared 12% of the time

More DNIF HYPERCLOUD Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 27% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 15% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 8% of the time

One Identity Cloud PAM Essentials vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 8% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 7% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DNIF HYPERCLOUD

August 2025

Download DNIF HYPERCLOUD product report

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

August 2025

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Overview

DNIF HYPERCLOUD is a cloud native platform that brings the functionality of SIEM, UEBA and SOAR into a single continuous workflow to solve cybersecurity challenges at scale. DNIF HYPERCLOUD is the flagship SaaS platform from NETMONASTERY that delivers key detection functionality using big data analytics and machine learning. NETMONASTERY aims to deliver a platform that helps customers in ingesting machine data and automatically identify anomalies in these data streams using machine learning and outlier detection algorithms. The objective is to make it easy for untrained engineers and analysts to use the platform and extract benefit reliably and efficiently.

NETMONASTERY

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Mahindra & Mahindra, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), ICICI Bank, Yes Bank, Tata Motors, RBL Bank

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. One Identity Safeguard

July 2025

Free Report: DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. One Identity Safeguard

Find out what your peers are saying about DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. One Identity Safeguard and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. One Identity Safeguard report.

See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.