Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DX NetOps vs Devo comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.7
Devo enhances root cause remediation by 50%, offering cost savings, scalability, fast cloud deployment, and diverse client flexibility.
Sentiment score
3.7
Organizations achieve positive ROI from DX NetOps within 1-1.5 years through cost savings, reduced downtime, and improved operations.
It can save you the cost of the product by reducing expenses and downtimes in 12 to 18 months.
Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
Devo's customer service is responsive and efficient, but improvements are needed in documentation and onboarding support.
Sentiment score
7.2
Customer service quality for DX NetOps varies, with recent improvements and notable US team support, but response times fluctuate.
Creating a support case based on priority allows for immediate responses.
Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services
Everything about DX NetOps is perfect, including the interface, technical support, and pricing.
Customer Success Intern at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
They are fast, responsive, and have technical expertise.
Senior Consultant at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Devo's cloud-based structure ensures seamless scalability, supporting diverse roles and extensive deployments for effective data handling and monitoring.
Sentiment score
6.0
DX NetOps excels in scalability, efficiently managing diverse networks and large-scale operations, making it ideal for extensive network oversight.
The product is very scalable, to the maximum.
Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Devo is highly stable and reliable, with minimal issues and efficient management, evolving positively as a cloud-native service.
Sentiment score
8.2
DX NetOps is praised for its stability, running smoothly without issues and receiving high ratings for dependable performance.
I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable.
Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies
 

Room For Improvement

Devo faces performance, customization, integration, and pricing challenges, needing improvements in AI, reporting, and dashboard capabilities.
DX NetOps needs better support, UX/UI, enhanced features, integration, AI capabilities, and streamlined systems for improved efficiency.
Integrations with other sandboxes could be improved to better interpret data using AI and machine learning models.
Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Different communication methods such as agent-based connections, TCP/IP, or secured connections are necessary—features not currently available in DX NetOps and Spectrum.
Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services
DX NetOps is somewhat convoluted, and some of the programming constructs can be documented or driven through languages such as Python, Perl, and shell scripting, but they have their proprietary language, which may not be very user-friendly.
Senior Consultant at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
I would particularly like it to integrate with the Symantec portfolio and the Carbon Black portfolio.
Customer Success Intern at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Setup Cost

Devo offers competitive pricing with flexible licensing, though metadata costs and subscription models may affect overall expenses.
DX NetOps offers flexible and often affordable pricing compared to competitors, providing robust capabilities and technical support.
I think the pricing is expensive.
Senior Consultant at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market.
Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies
 

Valuable Features

Devo's Activeboards offer intuitive, fast data visualization with high-speed queries, real-time analytics, and seamless integration for effective insights.
DX NetOps delivers scalable network monitoring with AI automation, top-notch analytics, and customizable dashboards for advanced visibility and management.
When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins.
Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data.
Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies
The best features I've seen so far with DX NetOps are that it can work with large scale systems, and it has a lot of functionalities and matrices.
Senior Consultant at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
The most valuable feature in DX NetOps is the topological view, which is the network topological view.
Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services
 

Categories and Ranking

Devo
Ranking in AIOps
20th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (28th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (24th), IT Operations Analytics (11th)
DX NetOps
Ranking in AIOps
19th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (36th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the AIOps category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DX NetOps is 1.4%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AIOps Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
DX NetOps1.4%
Devo1.1%
Other97.5%
AIOps
 

Featured Reviews

FR
Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Has improved investigative workflows with interactive dashboards and simplified data correlation
The data analytics cloud component focuses on real-time analytics, which is very impressive. The SIEM collects and correlates logs data from different sources and can integrate with ServiceNow, hardware asset management, and software asset management. The security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) is another valuable feature. The security data platform serves as the foundation of Devo. Regarding advanced query capabilities, Devo offers several models including query logs, visual query builder, language integrated query, and SQL, with SQL being the most frequently used querying data capability. The single pane of glass that Devo offers is the SOC. The tools in Devo's active ports are for investigating, not just viewing data. They are more interactive than other market solutions. The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins. This is particularly important for enterprise companies with numerous endpoints and users. The dynamic filtering of inputs significantly reduces the time cybersecurity analysts spend trying to figure out failed logins and identifying false positives.
Balabrahmam_Chakka - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services
Has provided topological insights and dashboard-driven network visibility across complex environments
DX NetOps can be improved by expanding its integrations with different tools, as it can currently integrate with Spectrum and other Broadcom products. It would be beneficial to gain integration capabilities with tools such as New Relic or SolarWinds. Integration with DX NetOps occurs through API, which fetches metrics from those tools, and this is currently happening in our area, with DX NetOps receiving data not only from Spectrum but also from New Relic and SolarWinds. DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds. For example, Sainsbury's uses SAP cloud, SAS, and Oracle cloud, where monitoring is not currently possible through DX NetOps and Spectrum, which are limited to certain mechanisms. Within the organization, SNMP is usable, but to display metrics from outside the organization, different communication methods such as agent-based connections, TCP/IP, or secured connections are necessary—features not currently available in DX NetOps and Spectrum.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AIOps solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
University
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
12%
Healthcare Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?
Compared to Splunk or SentinelOne, it is really expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
What needs improvement with Devo?
The single pane of glass that Devo offers could be improved. The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities. The drill-down reports capabilities, while useful...
What is your primary use case for Devo?
During my time at MetaBase Q and as a partner integrator of ServiceNow, I had the chance to understand and be part of projects integrating SOCs, NOCs, and Security Operation Centers with Devo. Most...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?
The pricing is fair for the level of enterprise capability it provides. Proper sizing and planning during deployment helps optimise licensing and overall cost. Anyone adopting it should account for...
What needs improvement with DX NetOps?
I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10. I would particularly like it to integrate with the Symantec portfolio and the Carbo...
What is your primary use case for DX NetOps?
I use DX NetOps for large-scale network monitoring, fault detection, and performance analysis. My work involves evaluating how well it handles distributed environments, event correlation, and proac...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel
Fujitsu
Find out what your peers are saying about DX NetOps vs. Devo and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.