We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and TSFactory RecordTS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Proofpoint, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in User Activity Monitoring."We are utilizing CyberArk to secure applications, credentials, and endpoints."
"We like it for the ability to automatically change passwords. At least for my group, that's the best thing."
"On the EBB user side, we were able to secure all the server root passwords and admin for Windows. This was a big win for us."
"We've written over a hundred custom connectors ourselves that allow us to do all types of privileged session management for various applications. On top of that, the rest of the API-based central credential providers allow us to get away from credentials that may be hard-coded in the script or some application."
"Technical support is very helpful whenever we have any questions."
"It is a robust product."
"With PAM in place, we've experienced a significant reduction in potential security breaches."
"It is very simple to use."
"We have used the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) and Citrix session recording features, and have found them to be extremely valuable."
"One of our current issues is a publishing issue. If we whitelist Google Chrome, all the events of Google Chrome should be gone. It is not happening."
"The documentation is rather basic and it is missing many use cases."
"The initial setup of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager difficulty depends on the environment that you are implementing it into. However, it typically is simple."
"It is easily customized, and that customization makes it very easy to start trying to shoehorn the solution into roles it was never intended to fill."
"The web interface has come a long way, but the PrivateArk client seems clunky and not intuitive. It could use an update to be brought up to speed with the usability of PVWA."
"CyberArk PAM could greatly benefit from an under-the-hood update; integrating machine learning algorithms could provide predictive insights."
"Over the past seven years, I have seen a lot of ups and downs with the product."
"CyberArk Privileged Access Manager could improve the integration docking, it should have more layers. For example, integration with OpenShift."
"A built in utility that alerts when connections are made, either via RDP or ICA."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in User Activity Monitoring with 142 reviews while TSFactory RecordTS is ranked 6th in User Activity Monitoring. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while TSFactory RecordTS is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TSFactory RecordTS writes "Utilize support for installation. They are quick to respond, and quick at getting to the bottom of issues". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas TSFactory RecordTS is most compared with Ekran System.
See our list of best User Activity Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all User Activity Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.