CyberArk Identity vs Red Hat Single Sign On comparison

The compared CyberArk and Red Hat solutions aren't in the same category. CyberArk is ranked #7 in CIaA , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 3.5% mindshare in the category. Red Hat is ranked #14 in SSO , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Identity

Read 29 CyberArk Identity reviews

4,192 Views
587 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Red Hat Single Sign On

Read 5 Red Hat Single Sign On reviews

1,069 Views
1,069 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Identity

Red Hat Single Sign On

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity and Red Hat Single Sign On based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Identity vs. Red Hat Single Sign On Report (Updated: July 2024).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

July 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 884,076 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Identity

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (9th), Identity Management (IM) (9th), Authorization Software (3rd), Enterprise Password Managers (9th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (9th), Access Management (8th), Active Directory Management (6th), Cloud Resource Access Management (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (7th)

Red Hat Single Sign On

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Identity and Access Management solutions, they serve different purposes. CyberArk Identity is designed for Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) and holds a mindshare of 3.5%, down 3.9% compared to last year.
Red Hat Single Sign On, on the other hand, focuses on Single Sign-On (SSO), holds 1.9% mindshare, down 2.4% since last year.

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CyberArk Identity	3.5%
Okta Platform	15.5%
Auth0 Platform	14.1%
Other	66.9%

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

Single Sign-On (SSO) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Red Hat Single Sign On	1.9%
Microsoft Entra ID	11.3%
Okta Platform	9.7%
Other	77.1%

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Hariharan Thangasamy

Cybersecurity Delivery Analyst at Accenture

Has strengthened privileged access control and improved audit visibility through session monitoring and password rotation

On the identity product side, it is awesome. However, they can improve in the documentation parts. For example, if there is a migration process, I can see the maximum customers are moving from self-hosted to on-premises or from on-premises to the cloud. It would be helpful if they released a generalized document for processes such as migration. A clear overview document would assist us in understanding more about the tool, configurations, and automations to enhance our security. Regarding the initial setup of CyberArk Identity, I faced some challenges. At some points, I could not find proper documentation for deploying, enhancing, or integrating with other components. I could not find the proper documentation in the community portal.

Read full review

Giovanni Baruzzi

Owner at Syntlogo GmbH

A stable and flexible solution with some basic capabilities

I set up Red Hat Single Sign-On in half an hour. I had to install a single sign-on solution for a customer. I reviewed a list of all available products, which were no more than fifty, and analyzed them. I chose it because it was convincing, modern, and based on technology from 2015. I put my trust in this product, and after nine years, I feel confident in my decision. Deploying this solution usually takes half an hour. You need an operating system running, then deploy the packages and prepare the interfaces. I rate the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Being able to integrate CyberArk Identity with Microsoft Defender is valuable."

"Overall, I would rate CyberArk Identity a nine out of ten."

"The initial setup of CyberArk Identity was straightforward."

"I find the CyberArk Identity portal quite intuitive; it has changed a lot over the last year and a half and if you think logically and understand your environment, it is easy to establish a suitable setup for yourself and all your vendors."

"The tool is a very strong and valuable enterprise solution, particularly in ensuring the continuity of service."

"It has machine learning and can help clients to learn the environment and understand what is happening."

"The feature that we find most valuable is the ability to integrate multiple IDs for on-premises Active Directory."

"The user identification is simplified, and managing user privileges, whether adding or revoking them, is also quite straightforward when utilizing CyberArk SaaS."

More CyberArk Identity pros

"Red Hat SSO has a lot of very concise, well laid out documentation, which is available in the free edition as well."

"Red Hat SSO integrates well with our other solutions. Using OIDC protocols and ITL integration, employees can authenticate with Red Hat SSO and access our microservices."

"It is very easy to scale and use as you want."

"The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value."

"Good support for single sign-on protocols."

"The solution is flexible and has the same basic capabilities right out of the box. The most important feature of this product is that it is a Red double-sided product. One side is a well-known open-source project; the other is a Red Hat commercial product. The commercial product benefits from all the experience and contributions of the community, making it a very well-developed product."

Cons

"The product is not cheap, especially if you opt for an on-premise deployment requiring a complex server infrastructure. On the other hand, choosing the software as a service version simplifies infrastructure requirements but necessitates being online all the time."

"The solution could be easier to use and I found it to be very complex involving many steps."

"I'm not sure what needs improvement. It is a good platform."

"The product needs to leverage the cloud more, especially in the financial sector, where cloud adoption might be limited. Proper reporting within the cloud is essential. The tool should be more user-friendly to expedite access for users. The current agent-based system poses challenges if a user loses access to the server, making tasks difficult to perform. It should also improve technical support."

"The solution's difficulty in gaining skill sets should be improved because it's a vertical product."

"Room for improvement for CyberArk Identity might be on the support side, as they constantly improve with new features and remove redundant ones, integrating multiple steps into a single one for easier use; however, this is not just CyberArk Identity, as many vendors start with basic troubleshooting services without recognizing that knowledgeable users often reach out after exhausting those options."

"They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."

"To enhance the product, they can consider improving the user interface of the software and possibly the customer support team. Sometimes, there is a delay in handling my inquiries via email, which could be addressed for better service."

More CyberArk Identity cons

"Red Hat SSO's architecture could be updated."

"Security could be improved."

"They could provide more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses, e.g., if somebody is trying to break into the system. Some other products have these detection mechanisms in case someone is trying to hack into the system or find out a user's passwords."

"The product’s technical support services could be better."

"Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheap and I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"There could be some additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution when you want to develop connectors in CyberArk Identity."

"CyberArk Identity is an expensive solution."

"The pricing of CyberArk Identity is competitive."

"There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed."

"The pricing is acceptable. It is worth considering what we are protecting with the amount charged."

"In terms of pricing, BeyondTrust and CyberArk tend to be more expensive, with CyberArk receiving an eight out of ten, in this regard."

"It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For the cost, it is expensive."

More CyberArk Identity pricing and cost advice

"Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive."

"The license is around $8000 USD."

"If you want support, that is when you use the paid version. There are different support categories that you can pay for, which provide different support levels. E.g., there is a quick response if you pay a higher amount, where the response time is within a few hours."

"It is a low cost product. This product can be used by non-profit organizations or universities, when they don't want to invest a lot of money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Government

18%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CyberArk Identity?

The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?

I am not certain about CyberArk Identity's exact pricing model. For comparison, Okta was around five dollars per user. CyberArk Identity offers good discounts to some clients, which influences thei...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?

We do not specifically use the password vaulting feature of CyberArk Identity. The centralized user dashboard of CyberArk Identity has not been that important for us. If it would be possible to sha...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Single Sign On?

I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Single Sign On?

Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources. Scalability could be improved, too. It could provide more documentation.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat Single Sign On?

Earlier, customers used to authenticate the user before they used the application. With the help of Single Sign On, the customer logs in and uses all of the customer's applications without authenti...

See all answers

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 7% of the time

Okta Platform vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 5% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 4% of the time

More CyberArk Identity Competitors

Okta Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 15% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 13% of the time

AWS IAM Identity Center vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 12% of the time

ManageEngine Password Manager Pro vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 10% of the time

More Red Hat Single Sign On Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity

March 2026

Download CyberArk Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

March 2026

Download Red Hat Single Sign On product report

Also Known As

Idaptive

Red Hat Single Sign-On, Red Hat SSO, RH SSO, RH-SSO

Overview

CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

CyberArk

Red Hat is the world’s leading provider of enterprise open source solutions, using a community-powered approach to deliver high-performing Linux, cloud, container, and Kubernetes technologies.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

July 2024

Free Report: CyberArk Identity vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Identity vs. Red Hat Single Sign On and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Identity vs. Red Hat Single Sign On report.

We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.