CyberArk Identity vs Red Hat Single Sign On comparison

The compared CyberArk and Red Hat solutions aren't in the same category. CyberArk is ranked #6 in CIaA , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 3.8% mindshare in the category. Red Hat is ranked #10 in SSO , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Identity

Read 28 CyberArk Identity reviews

2,972 Views
327 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Red Hat Single Sign On

Read 5 Red Hat Single Sign On reviews

982 Views
982 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Identity

Red Hat Single Sign On

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity and Red Hat Single Sign On based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Identity vs. Red Hat Single Sign On Report (Updated: July 2024).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

July 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Identity

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (10th), Identity Management (IM) (9th), Authorization Software (3rd), Enterprise Password Managers (8th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (9th), Access Management (5th), Active Directory Management (6th), Cloud Resource Access Management (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (6th)

Red Hat Single Sign On

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Identity and Access Management solutions, they serve different purposes. CyberArk Identity is designed for Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) and holds a mindshare of 3.8%, down 3.9% compared to last year.
Red Hat Single Sign On, on the other hand, focuses on Single Sign-On (SSO), holds 2.2% mindshare, down 2.8% since last year.

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CyberArk Identity	3.8%
Auth0	19.8%
Ping Identity Platform	11.9%
Other	64.5%

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

Single Sign-On (SSO) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Red Hat Single Sign On	2.2%
Microsoft Entra ID	19.9%
Okta Workforce Identity	8.2%
Other	69.7%

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Julio Montero

Access Management Analyst at Telefónica

Access management system provides strong security and effortless user authentication

The solution can be deployed on cloud or on-premises. CyberArk is more on the cloud than on local hardware. The deployment is initially quite difficult. That said, when you are doing the implementation of CyberArk, there are so many tutorials that make the learning process very easy. The only complaint could be the language barrier. It's difficult if you don't have a very good level of English. Otherwise, it is very easy. You can have it set up within three months without much difficulty. It's hard to get started, however, once you get going, it gets easier. A full deployment takes half a year or less. There is some maintenance necessary. A company is constantly hiring and letting go of employees. The access is always changing, so access must always be adjusted. Or, if we need another law of filter, we would need to add those, or even take them away. That's another aspect of maintenance.

Read full review

Giovanni Baruzzi

Owner at Syntlogo GmbH

A stable and flexible solution with some basic capabilities

I set up Red Hat Single Sign-On in half an hour. I had to install a single sign-on solution for a customer. I reviewed a list of all available products, which were no more than fifty, and analyzed them. I chose it because it was convincing, modern, and based on technology from 2015. I put my trust in this product, and after nine years, I feel confident in my decision. Deploying this solution usually takes half an hour. You need an operating system running, then deploy the packages and prepare the interfaces. I rate the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool helps with authentication. It acts as an MFA for any kind of privileged access that occurs in our organization."

"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half."

"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Identity is the adaptive interface."

"The setup, via cloud, is simple."

"It has aided in troubleshooting by allowing logs to be extracted and sent to a correlation engine, such as QRadar, for notifications or alerts."

"The UI is very simplified, and the documentation of CyberArk Identity is very crisp and clear."

"CyberArk Identity provides identity governance and gives me control over who and how access to environments occurs, offering significant confidentiality in what is accessed."

"Overall, I would rate CyberArk Identity a nine out of ten."

More CyberArk Identity pros

"The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value."

"It is very easy to scale and use as you want."

"Red Hat SSO has a lot of very concise, well laid out documentation, which is available in the free edition as well."

"The solution is flexible and has the same basic capabilities right out of the box. The most important feature of this product is that it is a Red double-sided product. One side is a well-known open-source project; the other is a Red Hat commercial product. The commercial product benefits from all the experience and contributions of the community, making it a very well-developed product."

"Good support for single sign-on protocols."

"Red Hat SSO integrates well with our other solutions. Using OIDC protocols and ITL integration, employees can authenticate with Red Hat SSO and access our microservices."

Cons

"The user interface could be improved."

"We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices."

"To enhance the product, they can consider improving the user interface of the software and possibly the customer support team. Sometimes, there is a delay in handling my inquiries via email, which could be addressed for better service."

"Room for improvement for CyberArk Identity might be on the support side, as they constantly improve with new features and remove redundant ones, integrating multiple steps into a single one for easier use; however, this is not just CyberArk Identity, as many vendors start with basic troubleshooting services without recognizing that knowledgeable users often reach out after exhausting those options."

"In terms of a governance platform, it's worth noting that CyberArk doesn't offer a particularly strong one."

"The product needs to leverage the cloud more, especially in the financial sector, where cloud adoption might be limited. Proper reporting within the cloud is essential. The tool should be more user-friendly to expedite access for users. The current agent-based system poses challenges if a user loses access to the server, making tasks difficult to perform. It should also improve technical support."

"In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for improvement."

"They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."

More CyberArk Identity cons

"Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources."

"They could provide more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses, e.g., if somebody is trying to break into the system. Some other products have these detection mechanisms in case someone is trying to hack into the system or find out a user's passwords."

"Security could be improved."

"The product’s technical support services could be better."

"Red Hat SSO's architecture could be updated."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of CyberArk Identity is competitive."

"There could be some additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution when you want to develop connectors in CyberArk Identity."

"I would rate the tool’s pricing a seven out of ten. The product’s pricing is expensive and is on a yearly basis. You will need to pay around 10,000 GBP for 500 users."

"In terms of pricing, BeyondTrust and CyberArk tend to be more expensive, with CyberArk receiving an eight out of ten, in this regard."

"The solution is cheap and I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."

"There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed."

"I think it is a fairly priced tool. I rate the tool between six and seven on a scale of one to ten where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

More CyberArk Identity pricing and cost advice

"It is a low cost product. This product can be used by non-profit organizations or universities, when they don't want to invest a lot of money."

"The license is around $8000 USD."

"If you want support, that is when you use the paid version. There are different support categories that you can pay for, which provide different support levels. E.g., there is a quick response if you pay a higher amount, where the response time is within a few hours."

"Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Government

18%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CyberArk Identity?

The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?

I am not certain about CyberArk Identity's exact pricing model. For comparison, Okta was around five dollars per user. CyberArk Identity offers good discounts to some clients, which influences thei...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?

The reporting functionality is somewhat complicated. While I would rate CyberArk Identity and Okta on the same level, Okta's reporting is crisper and clearer. For CyberArk Identity, you need knowle...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Single Sign On?

I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Single Sign On?

Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources. Scalability could be improved, too. It could provide more documentation.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat Single Sign On?

Earlier, customers used to authenticate the user before they used the application. With the help of Single Sign On, the customer logs in and uses all of the customer's applications without authenti...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 19% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 8% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 7% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 5% of the time

More CyberArk Identity Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 30% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 17% of the time

AWS IAM Identity Center vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 15% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 11% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 10% of the time

More Red Hat Single Sign On Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity

September 2025

Download CyberArk Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

September 2025

Download Red Hat Single Sign On product report

Also Known As

Idaptive

Red Hat Single Sign-On, Red Hat SSO, RH SSO, RH-SSO

Overview

CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

CyberArk

Red Hat is the world’s leading provider of enterprise open source solutions, using a community-powered approach to deliver high-performing Linux, cloud, container, and Kubernetes technologies.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

July 2024

Free Report: CyberArk Identity vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Identity vs. Red Hat Single Sign On and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Identity vs. Red Hat Single Sign On report.

We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.