We performed a comparison between Okta Workforce Identity and Red Hat Single Sign On based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The solution so far has been very stable."
"A solution that's easy to use, stable, and reliable."
"The most valuable features of Okta Workforce Identity are MFA, and SSO, which have high security."
"The provisioning functionality has been the most valuable. This solution has good performance, fast integration and is very responsive."
"This solution has a lot of capabilities and features."
"The most valuable features depend on a customer's needs. Our customers generally find multi-factor authentication very useful."
"The support for YubiKey is really good because you don't actually have to type in your username and password."
"What I found most valuable in Okta Workforce Identity is that it worked together with VMware Workspace One, so there was this device check at the same time. My company used the trusted device method that enabled you to define that only the trusted devices including the Workspace One agent were able to access the applications directly without an additional authentication step."
"Good support for single sign-on protocols."
"They also have single sign-on (SSO). When we bought Okta Workforce Identity a year and a half ago, I was also looking at SSO, but not much documentation was available for SSO. The documentation for SSO should be a little more robust for somebody who is implementing it for the first time."
"Application updates are lacking. Customer support needs to be improved."
"The guest user access could be improved."
"It's not compatible with on-premises installations, unless you host it as a SaaS. We were not able to do that. For example, imagine a scenario where the cloud is not available. Then, Okta will not work for you. That use case will readily fail because it doesn't have an on-premises installation that you can use to authenticate or provide identity and access management. If you have a purely on-premises solution that is not connected to the internet, then this will not work. This is one area that can be improved."
"There are some issues with the interface that can be improved."
"This user integration with the Okta integration network could be simplified."
"A room for improvement in Okta Workforce Identity is its price. It could be cheaper. The biggest benefit of the solution is that everything works securely without extra steps, so you're saving on your workforce's time and effort because your applications work smoothly and securely, but you'd need to pay some amount of money for that. Another area that could be improved, though not necessarily regarding Okta Workforce Identity, is the SSO applications because so many of the source applications charge extra money to put the SSO to work, which means you have to buy a more expensive license. Nowadays, SSO is a mainstream functionality and it should be out-of-the-box in those applications because it's so easy to set up."
"The pricing could be improved."
"Security could be improved."
Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 2nd in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) with 24 reviews while Red Hat Single Sign On is ranked 14th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 1 review. Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.6, while Red Hat Single Sign On is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Stable and reliable solution but the application updates are lacking". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Single Sign On writes "Good support for latest protocols and extensible; security could be improved". Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Google Cloud Identity, Azure Active Directory (Azure AD), SailPoint IdentityIQ, Auth0 and Duo Security, whereas Red Hat Single Sign On is most compared with Auth0, Azure Active Directory (Azure AD), PingFederate, Symantec Siteminder and AWS Single Sign-On.
We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
