CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs McAfee Application Control comparison

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is entirely cloud-based, so no further upkeep is required."

"Users can scale the solution."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance."

"The biggest benefit of CyberArk EPM for our customers is control over privileged access for endpoints. Endpoints are often the starting point for attackers to enter and move within a network. CyberArk EPM bridges the gap between security and operations teams. Operations teams are happy because work isn't stopped due to admin rights issues, while security teams are satisfied that full admin rights aren't given to all users."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager (EPM) 's most valuable feature is its ability to manage user application privileges and protect against ransomware attacks by controlling access to specific files and applications."

"It has drastically reduced the attack surface for local administrative rights and the chance of escalation of privilege. We've removed, at this point, close to 98 percent of the local administrative accounts on workstations. If there were an incident, it would stop at that point and we'd be able to know."

"The most valuable features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager are password management, session management, onboarding rules, platform customization, and safety management."

"We can do both server and endpoint protection."

"We also like the Change Control. We can control how things get executed. It has signatures for different kinds of protocols."

"This is a basic solution; the policy screen is okay, and it's easy to configure."

"The tool should be more user-friendly."

"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price should be made more flexible."

"The management of Privilege Access is not satisfactory."

"CyberArk has some performance issues. For example, servers could not handle the solution when we first took CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager could be improved by simplifying the administration process, specifically when setting up policies and applications."

"The main issues I experience are related to deployment, which requires dependency on other solutions like AD or SCCM. These tools need to be defined and synced with the client or agent and master, sometimes needing manual checks."

"Another enhancement needed is the scheduling of deployment, which I expect in future releases."

"There are many features that are currently missing. A customization option is required for certain policies."

"I would like to see better reporting and alerting features in the future."

"The intrusion detection features should also be improved. It is a very good feature but it should be maximized."

"Pricing depends on how many devices you use. Right now, on-premise, it costs us a little, but it's worth it. It seems like the cloud solution is much more expensive. We got this solution one year ago, and it's like we bought the solution, and now they are not going to support it on-premise anymore. We are in the implementation phase, and we missed this, and we already paid for the licenses. This is wasted time from my perspective, and CyberArk should be more customer-friendly."

"The solution requires an annual license to use it. There can be some extra costs in some cases."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable compared to other vendors' products."

"The tool is priced high. I would rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"The professional services for one eight-hour day would be $1,800."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable for customers."

"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive."

"The cost for CyberArk is very high."