Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs Sentry comparison

Broadcom and Sentry are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #49 with an average rating of 7.0, while Sentry is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3. Broadcom holds a 0.4% mindshare in APM, compared to Sentry’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sentry users who would recommend it.

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 2 Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reviews

485 Views
485 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Sentry

Read 14 Sentry reviews

8,480 Views
7,971 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Sentry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Sentry and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management compete in the performance monitoring space. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management has the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set across multi-platform environments.

Features: Sentry offers real-time error tracking, performance monitoring, and detailed insights into application health. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management provides comprehensive monitoring, advanced analytics, and multi-platform support.

Room for Improvement: Sentry needs better integration options, improved alerting functionalities, and more detailed documentation. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management requires better user documentation, a more intuitive setup process, and enhanced usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sentry is straightforward to deploy and has a responsive support team. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management has a more complex deployment process but also offers commendable customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Sentry is competitively priced and offers quick ROI, suitable for smaller organizations. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is higher in cost but justifiable with its robust feature set, providing substantial ROI for large-scale enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Sentry Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Sentry

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

49th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sentry

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Debugging (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sentry is 3.8%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Sentry	3.8%
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management	0.4%
Other	95.8%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shahpoup

Senior Deputy Manager, ITSM Architect at ICT Misr

Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly

My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.

Read full review

NelsonMendaros1

Founding Member at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Real-time error tracking assists the QA team in swiftly identifying and reporting bugs

One of the greatest advantages of Sentry is its support for Azure Web Services, which New Relic does not support. Sentry integrates with common developer communication platforms like Discord and WhatsApp, which allows developers to easily track notifications and findings in the applications. Real-time error tracking helps our Quality Assurance team easily identify the root causes of problems or bugs and promptly inform the developers about specific issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."

"The technical support and documentation are quite good."

"I would rate the stability of Sentry as eight out of ten."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create and assign rules and give access to particular users."

"Real-time error tracking helps our Quality Assurance team easily identify the root causes of problems or bugs and promptly inform the developers about specific issues."

"Great for capturing application performance metrics and error logs."

"Sentry breaks everything down in real time."

"Sentry is more accurate than some other tools such as Datadog because it has more integration with Slack, GitLab, Jira, or other ticketing tools."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"The stability is very good for Sentry and in general works well."

More Sentry pros

Cons

"They lack support and presence in Egypt."

"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."

"It would be nice if the product provided a map showing the users’ geographic location."

"I have not worked with Sentry long enough to provide advice for improvements. I need more experience and time."

"To deal with its shortcomings, Sentry needs to continuously improve in areas like the user interface and documentation, apart from its other features."

"The price could be lowered."

"Its debugging feature needs to be faster."

"I would like to see a role registration feature added."

"We cannot restrict particular columns on particular data. It would be helpful if that feature was improved."

"One area where I think Sentry can improve is in the granularity of its alerting system, as it sometimes feels too sensitive or not customizable enough."

More Sentry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."

"We can adjust the price a little bit based on our needs."

"I am currently using a self-hosted open version."

"Currently, we are in the production phase of our project and we are on free plans to use Sentry. Once we go live we will have to be on a subscription-based plan."

"We are currently paying through Cloudera for the Sentry service."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sentry?

Sentry is very affordable. We spend less than $200 to $300 a month. Compared to New Relic, it provides the necessary features at a cheaper cost, especially since we moved infrastructure monitoring ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sentry?

Right now, Sentry meets our needs and we have not encountered any bottlenecks. However, additional personalization and easier setup for capturing all the different application logs could be an area...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sentry?

We use Sentry for application performance management and tracking bugs and issues in the application.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Grafana vs Sentry

Compared 17% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Sentry

Compared 11% of the time

OpenTelemetry vs Sentry

Compared 9% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Sentry

Compared 8% of the time

Dynatrace vs Sentry

Compared 7% of the time

More Sentry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report

Download Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

Download Sentry product report

Also Known As

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

No data available

Overview

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

Broadcom

Sentry is a robust error management system known for real-time error tracking and integration with tools like Slack, GitLab, and Jira, benefiting those seeking comprehensive application performance insights.

Sentry offers a seamless platform to monitor errors in both front-end and back-end applications, providing real-time alerts and comprehensive event log context. With its integration capabilities, teams effectively track application metrics and access performance data without direct production access, ensuring enhanced reliability. Sentry's features such as event grouping and code trace logs linked to Git repositories highlight its utility in maintaining application efficiency. Enhanced security and regular updates make it a preferred choice over competitors. Despite some requests for improvements in automation and UI enhancements, Sentry remains invaluable for error management and application performance monitoring.

What are the key features of Sentry?

Integration capabilities: Connects with Slack, GitLab, Jira, AWS Lambda.
Real-time error tracking: Alerts users instantly about errors.
Event grouping: Groups related errors for easier management.
Code trace logs: Provides detailed trace logs linked to Git repositories.
Comprehensive context: Offers a complete view of events and context.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Sentry?

Enhanced reliability: Provides critical insights for robust application performance.
Accessibility: Easy deployment and quick adaptation make it user-friendly.
Security: Maintains high security standards with timely updates.
Utility in error management: Detects silent failures, aiding ETL processes.
Cost efficiency: Favored over alternatives like New Relic due to comprehensive features.

In industries like technology, Sentry is crucial for monitoring errors in web applications, offering real-time alerts and performance tracking. It is frequently used in ETL processes to detect failures without direct developer access, benefiting teams who manage large-scale applications and databases efficiently.

Sentry

Sample Customers

NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards

Dropbox, Airbnb, Stripe, Uber

Buyer's Guide

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Sentry

December 2025

Free Report: Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Sentry

Find out what your peers are saying about Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Sentry and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Sentry report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.