Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs ITRS Geneos comparison

Broadcom and ITRS are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #49 with an average rating of 7.0, while ITRS is ranked #33 with an average rating of 5.0. Broadcom holds a 0.4% mindshare in APM, compared to ITRS’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of ITRS users who would recommend it.

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 2 Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reviews

485 Views
485 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

4,305 Views
2,798 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

ITRS Geneos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

ITRS Geneos and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management are leading tools in the application performance monitoring market. Based on user reviews, ITRS Geneos has an advantage in ease of use, while Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is preferred for its comprehensive functionalities despite higher costs.

Features: ITRS Geneos offers real-time monitoring, extensive customization options, and reliable alerts. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management delivers wide-ranging monitoring capabilities, integration possibilities, and detailed analytics. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management stands out for broader monitoring and deeper insights.

Room for Improvement: ITRS Geneos requires enhanced reporting functions, a more modern design, and a user-friendly interface. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management needs improvements in setup complexity, better cost management, and simplified deployment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos offers a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management, although providing extensive support, has a more complex deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos users find the setup cost reasonable and ROI satisfactory, emphasizing good value for money. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management users report higher setup costs, but many feel the return on investment justifies the expense due to its advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. ITRS Geneos Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. ITRS Geneos

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

49th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

33rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (68th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (45th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ITRS Geneos	1.1%
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management	0.4%
Other	98.5%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shahpoup

Senior Deputy Manager, ITSM Architect at ICT Misr

Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly

My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.

Read full review

Durai CT

Head FM Monitoring at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

A stable, scalable, and flexible monitoring tool

Real-time data is one of the unique features that ITRS Geneos offers. For example, if there is an impact on a particular server and a particular application, I want to see what the impact is or what the CPU or hardware usage information is, as well as the service in the same application. I can see the real-time data and the impact by accessing ITRS Geneos and looking at the tree. I don't want a tool that tells me when something is broken. I want the tool to tell me when something is going to break. That is the difference between ITRS Geneos and other tools. I want proactive monitoring, not reactive. I don't need to be notified after the fact that something has broken. If something is broken, I get a notification by email, and some of my customers are going to call me. ITRS Geneos provides proactive monitoring. The great advantage of this tool is real-time monitoring. ITRS Geneos not only alerts us but also gives us a real-time view of the data. This is the tool's first great advantage. It is also lightweight and flexible and can adapt to monitor even low-latency systems, which is the tool's second advantage. Another great feature of this tool is its good presentation layer, which allows us to build custom dashboards to present to business stakeholders. This gives them a high-level status of what is being monitored. If we compare ITRS Geneos to other tools, we will find that each one specializes in a specific area, but the ITRS Geneos tool is more comprehensive. This is its great advantage.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support and documentation are quite good."

"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."

"The NetProbe carries over 100 samplers which are capable of monitoring hardware, OS, and the application layer."

"This tool allows one to analyse, integrate and customize as per the systems and allows you to set your own rules."

"The flexibility of the product is most valuable. It is highly customizable. If you put your mind to it and think of something you could do, there's a good possibility you can get it integrated within the console, if it's not readily available. The simplicity or ease of customization has been valuable."

"It enables us to monitor application processes, to do log-monitoring on a 24/7 basis, to do server-level monitoring - all the hardware parameters - as well as monitor connectivity across applications to the interfaces."

"The ability to logically normalize data gathered from multiple types of sources via pre-built plugins is extremely powerful. This functionality, coupled with the ability to import custom data via the Toolkit plugin allows Geneos to be leveraged to monitor every system in the enterprise."

"One of the most valuable features of ITRS Geneos is the active time feature that helps with the trading applications that I support."

"This solution has helped provide relief to existing Level 2 teams, allowing them to focus efforts on in-depth problem analysis."

"Custom script toolkits"

More ITRS Geneos pros

Cons

"They lack support and presence in Egypt."

"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."

"One thing that could be improved in terms of rapid scaling would be more ability to clone aspects of an implementation. It seems like there are opportunities in this area, where we have repetitive tasks to do when it comes to implementing things on new servers or on new gateways. It would be great if there was an easy way to clone something that had already been done."

"ITRS Geneos cloud monitoring is very weak and can use improvement."

"For the last year or two, I've been asking the vendor about the mobile app. This is something that probably everyone asks when they see the tool and they see how powerful it is. If there is any mobile app for this or if there is any way this tool can be more easily accessible other than having a big client installed, it would be great. I know you can build dashboards, et cetera, but there is no quick and easy way. I should be able to download an app, log in, and see my status. That will put this product above everything else out there. I believe it's on their roadmap."

"I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself."

"Backward compatibility with deprecated features and in system documentation on what configuration areas are needed to be updated."

"There is a part of the rules for monitoring alerts. I want to understand more about how to choose the samples and the requirements for the rules. That is the part that I want to understand better and get better training for."

"There is one drawback to using lightweight data collection: we lack the feature of observability based on time series, such as historical model data. This makes it difficult to view data in ITRS. ITRS needs to improve this feature."

"It needs to be easier to configure, especially with the JMX plugins."

More ITRS Geneos cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."

"Given our spend and the amount of service we have in it, the pricing is quite reasonable."

"Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements."

"Based on feedback from colleagues and friends working in the financial sector, Geneos is relatively costly. Many companies have been switching from Geneos to Dynatrace, Sysdig, or other monitoring tools in the past two years because of the price."

"The licensing cost may seem expensive upfront. However, the service is outstanding, the tool does things that no other tools can do, and the customizability more than makes up for the cost of licensing."

"The pricing is fairly market-related. They have been very lenient because we have been working with them for so long. An example is that we're currently migrating some of our services to AWS, and they've given us a grace period for some of the things to help with the migration and not to grow additional costs while we are migrating, but it's still on par with the market."

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

"Its price is reasonable. It isn't too expensive, and it isn't too cheap, but it also depends on a company's volume and negotiation."

"I can say it's not that cheap because the licensing is a little bit costly"

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

70%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	39

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ITRS Geneos?

ITRS offers multiple products, including upgrades for synthetic monitoring and a SaaS platform. Geneos is used for infrastructure monitoring, covering KPIs such as CPU, memory, processes, network l...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 15% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

Prometheus-AI Platform vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 5% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report

Download Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

January 2026

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Also Known As

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Geneos

Overview

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

Broadcom

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Sample Customers

NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Buyer's Guide

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. ITRS Geneos

December 2025

Free Report: Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. ITRS Geneos

Find out what your peers are saying about Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. ITRS Geneos and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. ITRS Geneos report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.