


Sweet Security and Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks are leading cybersecurity solutions in the market. Cortex Cloud holds the advantage due to its superior threat intelligence and comprehensive automation features.
Features: Sweet Security provides robust security analytics, responsive support, and streamlined operations. Cortex Cloud offers comprehensive threat intelligence, extensive automation, and enhanced threat detection and response.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sweet Security is simple to deploy with straightforward processes and attentive support. Cortex Cloud may be more complex to implement but offers superior technical support, ensuring smoother transitions.
Pricing and ROI: Sweet Security offers cost-effective setup with strong ROI, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Cortex Cloud requires a higher initial investment but delivers substantial ROI through its extensive features, attracting enterprises needing advanced protection.
After implementing SentinelOne, it takes about five to seven minutes.
Our ability to get in and review our vulnerability stance, whether daily, monthly, weekly, or whatever it might be, has drastically improved over our prior provider.
It has saved us more than 50% of our time.
The solution provides a good ROI, especially for regular customers, offering discounts for three-year licenses.
I don't think the tool in itself is very capable of doing that, but we have XSOAR and other tool integrations done on the platform, so this can be accomplished.
The ROI is that we are not waiting for a breach but being proactive rather than reactive.
Having a reliable team ready and willing to assist with any issues is essential.
Throughout the migration, they remained available for several hours without complaint, providing assistance at every step.
In my experience, I have never encountered a junior person or someone without knowledge coming into support from SentinelOne.
If I make it a high priority, they have resolved one query within 20 minutes.
If local Indian support cannot resolve an issue, global tech support aligns promptly within the agreed SLA.
Fast response times and knowledgeable staff who understand the intricacies of the system.
They are there immediately, providing us with the best technical people, solving any issue we had.
They gave me a trial period, did multiple follow-ups, and were reviewing themselves the findings to actually understand how their product is performing.
I would rate customer support a nine out of ten because they maintain a competitive price, offer trial periods, provide follow-up, are very responsive, and are effectively hands-on in assisting and offering prompt service and support.
The SentinelOne Singularity Cloud exhibits high scalability.
We've automated in our MDM so any device that we start in our MDM automatically installs SentinelOne.
It is scalable. I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
For stability, scalability, mean time to response, and potential incident investigation improvements, I would give it a nine or probably even a ten.
Onboarding endpoints and assets on Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is very easy.
The platform is able to auto-shut certain resources that are not in use through the agentless scan feature.
We don't need to scale it since it's all SaaS.
We are a robust enterprise with thousands of assets in the cloud or tens of thousands.
The user interface that I see doesn't make me very confident that I will be able to extract information in case I had hundreds or thousands of Kubernetes clusters or hundreds or thousands of hosts.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud is incredibly reliable.
The only downtime we had was when switching from V1 to V2 but it was smooth.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for stability.
My impression of Cloud Runtime Security in stopping attacks in real-time is that I have never had an issue where it has let something through, causing an outage or concerns to the customer.
However, now in Cortex Cloud, I have not seen any lag or buffer.
My evaluation of how stable and reliable Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is very positive.
I would rate the stability of Sweet Security a ten out of ten.
We have never had any issues with stability.
Sweet Security is stable, as I find that user experience does not tend to reveal many production problems, and when they do occur, they are resolved quickly.
If notifications are available, then it will be more helpful, easy, and time-saving.
Alerts should be directly tied to compliance standards and have a clear role in the overall compliance process.
The Infrastructure as Code service available in PingSafe and the services available in AWS cloud security can be merged so that we can get the security data directly from AWS cloud in PingSafe.
Regarding the generative AI security tool, I know for sure it's Agentic.
The solution is quite premium in cost compared to alternatives such as Wiz.
There is not a clear MSP model compared to other vendors such as CrowdStrike.
The next great thing that Sweet Security can do is to turn toward IAC, how it is handled and enforced, to tackle potential breaches of policy before they really happen.
Maybe they can just show the actual signal and not show that there is a lot of vulnerabilities, but indicate which are important.
The main areas for improvement are related to how Sweet Security needs to be customized.
With very little negotiation involved, we just let them know what we could pay and they were willing to meet us at slightly above what we paid with Sophos, which was still very fair for what we were looking at.
If you want to buy just EDR, the price is less. XDR is a little bit more expensive.
It should not be based on subscription. It should be based on the number of servers that I am scanning.
The solution is costly, with high-end capabilities suitable for enterprises.
Today, it is smart and easy to calculate the licenses.
They're not cheap, but they're not as expensive compared to other companies.
Sweet Security contains very similar features at a much better pricing.
Sweet Security's pricing is quite fair and cost-effective by many users.
This tool has been helpful for us. It allows us to search for vulnerabilities and provides evidence directly on the screen.
The cloud misconfiguration feature gave us almost zero false positives.
PingSafe has sped up the process by 80% to 90%.
AI/ML aids in anticipating remediation for misconfigurations and vulnerabilities, and automatic remediation can be easily configured.
Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has reduced the time spent on incident investigations, and if I had to estimate, I would say it has cut our investigation time in half.
This simplifies the management of shared responsibility among different people and entities, allowing you to use one single tool instead of having dozens of different tools to orchestrate and integrate.
Sweet Security's reporting tools enhance our insights into potential vulnerabilities and threats as they serve as our eyes and ears inside AWS, telling us what we are doing wrong so we can fix it.
Sweet Security enabled teams to see each detection of activity upon every request made from the application level towards the infrastructure, making it much easier and reducing the time for an analyst to understand what is really happening.
I really love the feature within Sweet Security platform that allows you to visualize the specific packages or functions that are being loaded to the memory and are actually being executed by the operational system.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security | 6.4% |
| Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks | 2.6% |
| Sweet Security | 1.5% |
| Other | 89.5% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 52 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 59 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers a streamlined approach to cloud security with intuitive operation and strong integration capabilities for heightened threat detection and remediation efficiency.
Singularity Cloud Security stands out for its real-time detection and response, effectively minimizing detection and remediation timelines. Its automated remediation integrates smoothly with third-party tools enhancing operational efficiency. The comprehensive console ensures visibility and support for forensic investigations. Seamless platform integration and robust support for innovation are notable advantages. Areas for development include improved search functionality, affordability, better firewall capabilities for remote users, stable agents, comprehensive reporting, and efficient third-party integrations. Clarity in the interface, responsive support, and real-time alerting need enhancement, with a call for more automation and customization. Better scalability and cost-effective integration without compromising capabilities are desired.
What are SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's standout features?
What benefits should users expect from SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is deployed in industries needing robust cloud security posture management, endpoint protection, and threat hunting. Utilized frequently across AWS and Azure, it assists in monitoring, threat detection, and maintaining compliance in diverse environments while providing real-time alerts and recommendations for proactive threat management.
Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks enhances cloud security with features like AI/ML threat detection and automated remediation, ensuring real-time protection and efficient management across cloud environments.
Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers comprehensive cloud security posture management and runtime protection. It reduces manual tasks and accelerates incident investigation through advanced threat detection and AI-driven anomaly detection. With integration to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, it boosts threat response while reducing incident resolution time. Although users find the UI complex and pricing high, its capabilities in securing AWS, Azure, and other environments, as well as its potential integration with CyberArk, emphasize its enterprise-ready design for cloud transformation across diverse industry sectors.
What are the key features of Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks?Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is deployed across industries like telecom, BFSI, and manufacturing for robust cloud security. It's leveraged for detecting misconfigurations and vulnerabilities, aiding cloud transformation and compliance with standards such as GDPR and NIST. The integration across cloud infrastructures, including AWS and Azure, supports policy creation and threat management strategies for diverse enterprises.
Sweet Security offers advanced cybersecurity measures designed to protect enterprise-level networks from complex threats, providing efficient monitoring and robust protection capabilities.
Focused on sophisticated threat detection and network security, Sweet Security provides an enterprise-grade solution for cybersecurity challenges. It integrates seamlessly with existing systems, offering real-time analytics and threat intelligence. Its comprehensive approach ensures high-level data protection and security management, allowing organizations to focus on core functionalities.
What features make Sweet Security stand out?Implementation of Sweet Security across industries like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce demonstrates its versatility and effectiveness. In finance, it safeguards sensitive financial data; in healthcare, it ensures patient data privacy; and in e-commerce, it protects online transactions from fraud, making it an invaluable asset in today's digital landscape.
We monitor all Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.