Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Sweet Security Logo

Top 10 Sweet Security Alternatives

Vendor: Sweet Security
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Sweet Security Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Sweet Security based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wiz, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, and Orca Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Sweet Security surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive threat detection, real-time alerts, and advanced data protection, ensuring robust cybersecurity solutions tailored for businesses, enhancing efficiency with user-friendly interfaces and seamless integration.

Sweet Security Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Sweet Security, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Sweet Security Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Sweet Security Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Wiz impresses with its intuitive dashboard and cost-effective pricing, ideal for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing ease of use. In comparison, Sweet Security captivates with advanced analytics and customizability, appealing to those seeking deep control over security settings despite higher costs.
Wiz has a straightforward setup cost, while Sweet Security offers a more flexible pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
Wiz has a straightforward setup cost, while Sweet Security offers a more flexible pricing model.
Sweet Security Logo
Sweet Security Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers comprehensive security for complex cloud environments, attracting businesses needing extensive integration capabilities. In comparison, Sweet Security appeals with easy implementation and responsive support, ideal for cost-conscious companies prioritizing agility and swift deployment without extensive IT resources.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a higher initial setup cost, whereas Sweet Security offers a more affordable setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a higher initial setup cost, whereas Sweet Security offers a more affordable setup.
Sweet Security Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
Sweet Security Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
Orca Security offers comprehensive analytics and full-stack visibility, making it suitable for organizations emphasizing detailed asset discovery and compliance. In comparison, Sweet Security provides seamless integration and ease of use, ideal for tech buyers prioritizing quick deployment and robust threat detection.
Orca Security requires a substantial initial setup cost, while Sweet Security offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Orca Security requires a substantial initial setup cost, while Sweet Security offers a more cost-effective setup option.
Sweet Security Logo
Sweet Security Logo
Aqua Cloud Security Platform
4.0 out of 5
Aqua Cloud Security Platform offers advanced container security and a holistic approach, making it ideal for broad cloud-native protection. In comparison, Sweet Security excels in threat detection with advanced analytics, appealing to buyers needing specialized threat response capabilities.
Aqua Cloud Security Platform involves a higher setup cost with advanced features, whereas Sweet Security offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to businesses with cost constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Aqua Cloud Security Platform involves a higher setup cost with advanced features, whereas Sweet Security offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to businesses with cost constraints.
Sweet Security Logo
Qualys TotalCloud
4.4 out of 5
Sweet Security Logo
Qualys TotalCloud
4.4 out of 5
Qualys TotalCloud offers comprehensive features, robust support, and seamless integration for large organizations needing in-depth security. In comparison, Sweet Security excels in cost-effectiveness, rapid deployment, and targeted functionalities, appealing to smaller enterprises or those prioritizing budget.
Qualys TotalCloud offers an easy setup process with minimal costs, while Sweet Security's setup incurs higher fees but provides more robust customization options.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys TotalCloud offers an easy setup process with minimal costs, while Sweet Security's setup incurs higher fees but provides more robust customization options.
Sweet Security Logo
Upwind
4.8 out of 5
Sweet Security Logo
Upwind
4.8 out of 5
Sweet Security attracts tech buyers with competitive pricing, seamless integration, and responsive support. In comparison, Upwind appeals to those seeking advanced features and analytics. Sweet Security offers cost-effective solutions, while Upwind provides a robust, feature-rich experience for complex security requirements.
Sweet Security requires a higher setup cost, while Upwind offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Sweet Security requires a higher setup cost, while Upwind offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Sweet Security Logo
Stream.Security
1 out of 5
Sweet Security Logo
Stream.Security
1 out of 5
Sweet Security excels in pricing, ease of deployment, and customer service with real-time threat detection. In comparison, Stream.Security offers advanced analytics and automated response capabilities. Sweet Security is ideal for quick setup needs, while Stream.Security caters to complex security demands.
Sweet Security requires an upfront setup cost, while Stream.Security offers a more economical initial setup, highlighting significant cost differences that can impact budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Sweet Security requires an upfront setup cost, while Stream.Security offers a more economical initial setup, highlighting significant cost differences that can impact budget-conscious users.

Related categories

Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)
Vulnerability Management
Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)