CloudVision vs OpenText AI Operations Management comparison

Arista and OpenText are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Arista is ranked #28 with an average rating of 9.0, while OpenText is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.3. Arista holds a 0.1% mindshare in CMS, compared to OpenText’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Arista users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

CloudVision

Read 2 CloudVision reviews

183 Views
179 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText AI Operations Mana...

Read 48 OpenText AI Operations Management reviews

1,290 Views
413 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

CloudVision

OpenText AI Operations Mana...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

OpenText AI Operations Management and CloudVision are competing products in AI-driven operations management. OpenText appears to have an edge in pricing and support, making it an attractive choice for cost-effective solutions. However, CloudVision stands out with its advanced features, making it preferable for those prioritizing technological capabilities.

Features: OpenText AI Operations Management offers robust automation tools, predictive analytics, and enhanced operational efficiency. CloudVision provides real-time network visibility, superior integration capabilities, and comprehensive data insights, focusing on network management and visibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText AI Operations Management ensures a smoother transition with its intuitive setup process and strong customer support. CloudVision offers a streamlined deployment model that integrates with existing systems, supported by reliable customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText AI Operations Management is known for lower setup costs with good ROI over time through its cost-effective solutions. CloudVision, while having a higher initial cost, justifies its pricing with higher ROI through advanced features and capabilities, balancing OpenText’s affordability against CloudVision’s premium for functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudVision vs. OpenText AI Operations Management Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudVision vs. OpenText AI Operations Management

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudVision

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

28th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText AI Operations Mana...

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

29th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (8th), IT Operations Analytics (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CloudVision is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText AI Operations Management is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CloudVision	0.1%
OpenText AI Operations Management	0.5%
Other	99.4%

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Nimit Puvar

AVP Enterprise Sales at Ashtech Infotech (India) Pvt.Ltd.

Clients experience effective network management and comprehensive monitoring

Arista currently provides their solution for their own Arista products only. A problem occurs because customers do not have only Arista products. Sometimes they have different kinds of products available in their network. For monitoring that network, they have to either procure more solutions from third parties or they have to procure the provider OEM to manage their switches. If Arista can integrate third-party switches for monitoring purposes, it will be beneficial for the customers. Arista and other competitors such as Cisco or HPE Aruba have their own benefits. Cisco and Aruba face the challenge of having multiple OS for networking their products, whereas Arista has a single OS across their products. This is very beneficial for customers as they only have to manage a single OS.

Read full review

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Powerful data integration, comprehensive automation, and hybrid compatibility

The data lake is a very powerful feature within OpenText Operations Bridge. It can integrate with any BI tool to collect AI data and perform a variety of functions. It offers hybrid compatibility and supports desktop application customization and cloud integration. Another essential capability is server automation, which became significantly easier with the software appliance for deployment. This solution also provides role-based access that enhances data privacy and security.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product provides a central management feature. It helps in eliminating human errors. It doesn't have a lot of bugs for software."

"A single point of management and monitoring, as well as upgradation and update is valuable."

"The most valuable feature is that everything can be consolidated into one dashboard."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its grouping scripts and event focus."

"We use the on-premises version to monitor our systems and manage emails. All our systems use Operations Bridge, especially the critical systems."

"It allows us to build dashboards for individual parts of the business. Our team members appreciate that they can just get a view of their part of the world without having to worry about anyone else's."

"You can create an application topology that shows relationships between different components."

"It has the capability to display overall health of the infrastructure and is very useful for executive reports on the health of the infrastructure."

"Purely, its flexibility is the most valuable aspect. It is hugely configurable."

"I've found the solution to be very scalable."

More OpenText AI Operations Management pros

Cons

"Arista currently provides their solution for their own Arista products only. A problem occurs because customers do not have only Arista products."

"CloudVision could have a user-friendly interface."

"The service takes a very long time to start and it requires a lot of resources."

"I know that in the next version, X1005, they're moving to more graphical overviews, which should help our senior managers."

"It is a very complicated product. It's difficult to manage. Nowadays, products are very easy to manage, deploy, and integrate, but Operations Bridge is very complicated to manage."

"The initial setup of this tool is complex for people who lack experience with it."

"I'm not aware of areas that need improvement."

"The pricing could be improved."

"The deployment of agents on new CI should be improved. There should be some kind of automation to directly deploy them from the console. It can maybe have some more AI functions because most of the other tools are going in that direction."

"Reporting has to be tackled a bit more. Conceptually, it is there and conceptually it is amazing, but somehow the module itself is suffering."

More OpenText AI Operations Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CloudVision is an expensive product. We purchase its yearly license."

"The cost is very high."

"As OpsBridge is a suite of products bundled together, you may find yourself paying for software functionality that you don't actually use, e.g. Real User Monitor (RUM)."

"The licensing cost for this solution is approximately $1,000 USD."

"Pricing is very flexible and depends on the modules selected as per the requirement."

"The licensing model for Micro Focus Operations Bridge is unit-based so it can be one device or ten devices depending on your situation or model. Cost-wise, it's much more if you have more devices and features such as infrastructure monitoring, analytic dashboard, and business dashboard in your model."

"Setup costs can be high depending on the partner, but it is worth it."

"It is competitive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudVision?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudVision?

We are using the same products. We implement CloudVision, but have not implemented the security portion of that.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudVision?

It depends upon the nature of the business of the customers. If a customer is in the finance sector and they require very fast reply time, then they have a larger benefit compared to normal manufac...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

From a cost perspective, OpenText Operations Bridge is cost-effective as it saves us man hours. What used to be done manually by a person is now done automatically. With its automation capabilities...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

The only aspect I find lacking in OpenText Operations Bridge is more aesthetic. The dashboards from OpenText Operations Bridge, when compared to those from Splunk, are less visually appealing. Splu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

We use OpenText Operations Bridge ( /products/opentext-operations-bridge-reviews ) more from an event correlation perspective. We do not use it for pure monitoring since we have other monitoring to...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

SCOM vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 17% of the time

OpsRamp vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 16% of the time

BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 12% of the time

Devo vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 10% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText AI Operations Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Monitoring Software

September 2025

Download CloudVision product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AI Operations Management

September 2025

OpenText AI Operations Management report

Download OpenText AI Operations Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Operations Bridge, Operations Bridge Manager, Micro Focus Operations Analytics

Overview

CloudVision offers advanced network visibility and management, designed to enhance operational efficiency for tech-savvy businesses. Its innovative approach caters to dynamic environments, ensuring seamless experiences.

CloudVision is tailored for enterprises needing consistent network performance and robust analytics. It provides comprehensive visibility into network operations, allowing businesses to monitor, manage, and optimize their environments effectively. Users benefit from its seamless integration capabilities, providing a centralized view of the entire network. The platform's adaptability ensures it meets the growing demands of modern IT infrastructures.

What are the key features?

Network Automation: Simplifies repetitive tasks with automated processes.
Real-time Analytics: Offers detailed insights to improve decision-making.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network demands.
Seamless Integration: Combines with existing systems for enhanced functionality.
Simple Setup: Quick deployment process minimizes downtime.

What benefits should users examine?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs with automated solutions.
Improved Performance: Enhances network reliability to support critical operations.
Time Savings: Frees up resources for strategic tasks by automating routine work.
Increased Visibility: Provides comprehensive monitoring for proactive management.
Enhanced Security: Mitigates risks with real-time threat detection.

In financial services, CloudVision streamlines data flow, ensuring transactions remain secure and uninterrupted. Healthcare institutions leverage it for reliable patient data management, enhancing service delivery. Its adoption in retail enables seamless connectivity across multiple locations, improving customer experiences.

Arista

OpenText AI Operations Management centralizes event correlation and monitoring across infrastructures, prioritizing scalability and automation for efficient alert management. It empowers organizations with transparency and insights essential for effective IT resource management in hybrid cloud environments.

OpenText AI Operations Management offers comprehensive solutions for event correlation, integration, and centralized alert management. With capabilities that streamline operations, this tool supports efficient IT management across AWS, GCP, and on-premises environments. Despite requiring improvements in performance and usability, its robust reporting and seamless monitoring provide valuable insights for root cause analysis. Users leverage this platform to integrate event data, automate incidents, and manage hybrid infrastructures effectively, making it a key component in enhancing service perspectives globally. Its heavy architecture and reliance on Java and Flash, coupled with complex licensing and pricing, necessitate attention to functionality and support areas.

What are the key features of OpenText AI Operations Management?

Event Correlation: Integrates and correlates event data for improved incident response.
Centralized Alerts: Raises alerts efficiently to streamline IT operations.
Comprehensive Dashboard: Consolidates information for better visibility.
Hybrid Cloud Support: Manages AWS, GCP, and on-premises environments.
Automation: Enhances operations with server automation and performance management.

What benefits do users find with OpenText AI Operations Management?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines IT processes for quicker issue resolution.
Transparency: Offers robust reporting and data centralization for clarity.
Resource Management: Improves management of IT resources and service perspectives.
Scalability: Accommodates growth with flexible architecture.
Noise Reduction: Decreases event noise to enhance response efficiency.

OpenText AI Operations Management is widely implemented in industries requiring comprehensive monitoring capabilities. Organizations benefit from its ability to consolidate tools and manage events effectively across hybrid environments. The integration of incident automation and performance evaluation tools is particularly beneficial for those looking to enhance compliance support and reduce response times. Despite some challenges, the platform remains a valuable asset in managing complex IT environments and improving operational effectiveness.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

GE Money Bank, Bank AlJazira, Tech Mahindra

Buyer's Guide

CloudVision vs. OpenText AI Operations Management

September 2025

Free Report: CloudVision vs. OpenText AI Operations Management

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudVision vs. OpenText AI Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudVision vs. OpenText AI Operations Management report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.