We performed a comparison between Cloudian HyperIQ and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."The tool has a very good interface and helps to monitor the nodes and resources. The most valuable feature is the S3 dashboard. It helps in migration, and we can monitor the data for at least three months."
"There is less computing power needed for scaling."
"The solution is open-source, easy to manage, and user-friendly making it easy for anyone to use."
"Every new asset placed in the environment can be automatically detected, predicting human failures."
"Setup was straightforward. Initial deployment took two or three months."
"The product is very stable."
"The performance and bandwidth are valuable features."
"The integration capabilities and APIs are the best part."
"It has an intuitive UI with beautiful graphs and customizable maps."
"The installation process needs to be improved, and the tool needs a better script. Cloudian HyperIQ runs on Docker containers. Sometimes, the file system gets filled. The tool needs to have separate Docker volumes in the installation script. The documentation for reporting needs to be improved. I am not able to generate reports using it. The alert mechanisms also need to be improved. It should integrate with AI and give more metrics to be taken up next year. We can show the response peak as an improvement to our leadership."
"The networking monitor is not too easy to work with."
"An area for improvement would be the ease of doing aggregation from the value or different devices."
"We would like to see the addition of automatic push functionality to this product. This would save time when monitoring our servers and networks as, at present, we have to manually install the Zabbix agent on any hardware to be monitored."
"The server monitoring could be better."
"Outside of the normal standard monitoring, I would like to extend patching, importing patching, and supporting patching for Windows Servers."
"There are areas of improvement. The database grows really fast. So, when you install Zabbix, you have to deal with some issues, like the database. We become pretty big very fast."
"Zabbix technical support is sold separately."
"I would like to see a more flexible mobile client, and better HA out of the box."
Cloudian HyperIQ is ranked 39th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 1 review while Zabbix is ranked 1st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 98 reviews. Cloudian HyperIQ is rated 10.0, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cloudian HyperIQ writes "Includes a Grafana dashboard that helps to improve monitoring and reporting ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Cloudian HyperIQ is most compared with Nagios XI, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios XI and Nagios Core.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
