Cloudian HyperIQ vs Zabbix comparison

"The tool has a very good interface and helps to monitor the nodes and resources. The most valuable feature is the S3 dashboard. It helps in migration, and we can monitor the data for at least three months."

"The solution is open-source, easy to manage, and user-friendly making it easy for anyone to use."

"The level of discovery-based configuration that lets us auto-configure the monitoring for various systems is a valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature is the protocol to manage anything."

"Zabbix is good for discovery."

"It's the best solution. Great. I would rate the overall solution ten out of ten."

"The solution is stable."

"Dashboard and the customization of the items and triggers are the most valuable features."

"The most valuable feature is that it provides network segregation for server monitoring."

"The installation process needs to be improved, and the tool needs a better script. Cloudian HyperIQ runs on Docker containers. Sometimes, the file system gets filled. The tool needs to have separate Docker volumes in the installation script. The documentation for reporting needs to be improved. I am not able to generate reports using it. The alert mechanisms also need to be improved. It should integrate with AI and give more metrics to be taken up next year. We can show the response peak as an improvement to our leadership."

"It would be helpful if they translated the documentation to Cyrillic languages."

"The main problem with Zabbix is that you have to spend time writing templates for all of the products that you have."

"I would like for this solution to be more cloud-friendly."

"Zabbix technical support is sold separately."

"When we have a problem, we have to do a lot of research to solve it."

"Zabbix does not draw automatic mapping of the network, this is something they should add in the future. There is a lot of effort that is involved in tailoring some of the settings which could be made easier."

"Its UI should be improved. They did some improvements in version 5, but it could benefit from some more work. Its integrations should also be improved. They've been active for one year, and they seem to have noticed that. It has new integrations, but it could benefit from more integrations. As far as I know, there is no model to push statistics, metrics, or events towards Zabbix. This type of API isn't yet there, whereas some other tools provide an API for this."

"As far as improvements, sometimes I get a bit frustrated when I move from a previous version to a new one because some configuration has changed—I need to investigate the documentation to deal with some configuration. But it doesn't take much time, so it's okay."

"Cloudian HyperIQ's licensing is cheap."

"We use the open-source version of Zabbix."

"It's free software released under the GNU/GPL license."

"It is freeware. We still use the free version of Zabbix."

"For pricing, it's free. We don't pay anything for it. They open-source the code, and people pay for support."

"This is an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"Zabbix is an open-source tool, and it's free to use."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"This solution is open-source and free to use."