Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cloudian HyperIQ vs PRTG Network Monitor comparison

Cloudian and Paessler GmbH are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cloudian is ranked #39 with an average rating of 10.0, while Paessler GmbH is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.8. Cloudian holds a 0.1% mindshare in IM, compared to Paessler GmbH’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cloudian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Paessler GmbH users who would recommend it.
Cloudian HyperIQ
Read 1 Cloudian HyperIQ review
  • 123 Views
  • 87 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
PRTG Network Monitor
Read 102 PRTG Network Monitor reviews
  • 6,499 Views
  • 4,437 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

PRTG Network Monitor and Cloudian HyperIQ are competing in the network monitoring and data analytics domain. Cloudian HyperIQ seems to have the upper hand due to its feature richness, offering more perceived value.

Features: PRTG Network Monitor offers a robust alerting system, scalability, and integration capabilities, providing a comprehensive monitoring solution. Cloudian HyperIQ delivers advanced data analytics tools and real-time visualization, making it suitable for efficiently handling large data sets. The main difference is Cloudian HyperIQ's advanced analytics capabilities, which cater to organizations with complex data needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PRTG Network Monitor is known for its straightforward installation and reliable customer support, ensuring smooth deployment. Cloudian HyperIQ, while providing comprehensive deployment options, may require more setup time but benefits from proactive customer service. The primary distinction is PRTG Network Monitor’s easy installation compared to Cloudian HyperIQ's detailed configuration needs.

Pricing and ROI: PRTG Network Monitor provides a cost-effective setup with significant ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Cloudian HyperIQ, though requiring more upfront investment, balances its cost with high functionality and long-term benefits. The key difference is PRTG Network Monitor's affordable setup versus Cloudian HyperIQ's higher initial cost, offset by superior long-term ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloudian HyperIQ
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
39th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PRTG Network Monitor
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
102
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (5th), Cloud Monitoring Software (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cloudian HyperIQ is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PRTG Network Monitor is 4.3%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Kiran Rajanna - PeerSpot reviewer
Includes a Grafana dashboard that helps to improve monitoring and reporting
The installation process needs to be improved, and the tool needs a better script. Cloudian HyperIQ runs on Docker containers. Sometimes, the file system gets filled. The tool needs to have separate Docker volumes in the installation script. The documentation for reporting needs to be improved. I am not able to generate reports using it. The alert mechanisms also need to be improved. It should integrate with AI and give more metrics to be taken up next year. We can show the response peak as an improvement to our leadership.
Read full review
Tochukwu Uzomba - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficiently monitor networks across regions with seamless setup and robust feature set
PRTG Network Monitor is easy to set up. Within a few minutes, it is operational. It is an all-in-one monitoring solution without extra costs. For example, we set it up for an insurance company with branches across Africa. We are able to monitor from Lagos without installing anything in the branches, using the agentless feature. We just put in the IP address and the parameter, and we monitor from those ends. Additionally, all the sensors are very useful. Most people are interested in the bandwidth monitoring sensor to see what bandwidth the users are consuming. The pricing is affordable compared to SolarWinds.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool has a very good interface and helps to monitor the nodes and resources. The most valuable feature is the S3 dashboard. It helps in migration, and we can monitor the data for at least three months."
"The network visualization helps us to drill down deeper."
"The solution provides us response times to issues."
"The most valuable feature of PRTG Network Monitor is the different monitoring probes available."
"I can customize the port as per my need and the real-time monitoring feature that is already provided to me."
"It improves the status of my infrastructure, from networking devices to real-time machines."
"The initial setup was easy. We didn't have any issues with the process and everything rolled out smoothly."
"It is nice to have one place where all the information is right there in front of us."
"I think net flow is PRTG's most valuable feature because it doesn't cost much for us because the net flow sensor is already included in the PRTG license. We can monitor our traffic in our proxy and router."
More PRTG Network Monitor pros
 

Cons

"The installation process needs to be improved, and the tool needs a better script. Cloudian HyperIQ runs on Docker containers. Sometimes, the file system gets filled. The tool needs to have separate Docker volumes in the installation script. The documentation for reporting needs to be improved. I am not able to generate reports using it. The alert mechanisms also need to be improved. It should integrate with AI and give more metrics to be taken up next year. We can show the response peak as an improvement to our leadership."
"I would like to have a VM version that can be installed on a cloud such as Azure. We're using Azure, and we're eliminating on-premise servers. It would be helpful to have a PRTG version that can be installed on the Azure cloud."
"I would like the ability to monitor Cisco IRS devices."
"PRTG Network Monitor could improve by having descriptions for the tab usages. The dashboards or interface could be easier to understand."
"Mostly, this software has sensors for devices to monitor specs and you can build or develop or modify various sensors, according to your company's needs. But you may need to do that with coding or plugins or with the support of Paessler AG, the manufacturer."
"I would like to see more updates available in this solution."
"When using PRTG Network Monitor it is beneficial if you have prior experience with it, the user interface could improve."
"A room for improvement in PRTG Network Monitor is its sensors. Its application technology sensor, such as the IAS, .NET, etc., needs some improvement because it doesn't work as expected. For example, the IAS sensor doesn't give immediate information, and the information you get from it isn't of good value. The web GUI of PRTG Network Monitor also needs improvement because errors keep popping up if it's not been updated to the latest version. What I'd like to see in the next release of the tool is end-to-end topology mapping for the business model, and that should be required. There has to be a technical map. Technical mapping and topological creation are missing in PRTG Network Monitor, so I would like to see those in the future."
"PRTG's documentation could be improved."
More PRTG Network Monitor cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cloudian HyperIQ's licensing is cheap."
"While I am not the person who deals with pricing, I would say that we pay around 1000 pounds a year."
"We've got the unlimited package... I believe it was around the £15,000 per year mark."
"Because we are only on the free version, we have a limited number of sensors. Therefore, we are not monitoring as much as we want to be to obtain historical information."
"I rate the price of PRTG Network Monitor an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is a high price, and ten is a low price."
"We looked at PRTG and SolarWinds. From a cost side perspective, compared to PRTG, and from what you get back from it, PRTG was sort of a hands down the winner."
"It's an annual license that is based on the number of endpoints that we're tracking and using."
"The price is actually on the cheaper side. If you're going with the unlimited license code, it's very cheap compared to competitors unless you're going for something free, like Zabbix. But you get what you pay for, and it doesn't have the full suite of products or tools like SolarWinds or a ScienceLogic."
"Licenses are very expensive, so I would like to see cheaper licensing."
More PRTG Network Monitor pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user174738 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 31, 2015
Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor
I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
48%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
5%
Financial Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cloudian HyperIQ?
The tool has a very good interface and helps to monitor the nodes and resources. The most valuable feature is the S3 dashboard. It helps in migration, and we can monitor the data for at least thre...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudian HyperIQ?
Cloudian HyperIQ's licensing is cheap.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cloudian HyperIQ?
The installation process needs to be improved, and the tool needs a better script. Cloudian HyperIQ runs on Docker containers. Sometimes, the file system gets filled. The tool needs to have separat...
See all answers
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
PRTG network monitor is one of the best tool i have ever used for the monitoring. It have auto discovery option. it avoid the configuring the device in PRTG. It automatically discover the device an...
See all answers
What do you like most about PRTG Network Monitor?
The tool is integrated with our email for the alerts.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PRTG Network Monitor?
The prices are very high for PRTG Network Monitor. That's why I'm using the free100 sensor license.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs Cloudian HyperIQ Logo
Nagios XI vs Cloudian HyperIQ
Compared 59% of the time
More Cloudian HyperIQ Competitors
Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 7% of the time
LibreNMS vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LibreNMS vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 7% of the time
PRTG Enterprise Monitor vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Enterprise Monitor vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 6% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 6% of the time
Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 6% of the time
More PRTG Network Monitor Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
April 2025
Cloudian HyperIQ reportDownload Cloudian HyperIQ product report
Buyer's Guide
PRTG Network Monitor
April 2025
PRTG Network Monitor reportDownload PRTG Network Monitor product report
 

Also Known As

HyperIQ
No data available
 

Overview

Gain operational insights with Cloudian HyperIQ, a monitoring and predictive analysis tool. View data from across your Cloudian environment, including storage and networking. Set thresholds and alerts to highlight potential issues and identify corrective action. Within a single site or across multiple locations, HyperIQ gives you real-time insights.

Cloudian

PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.

To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.

Paessler GmbH
 

Sample Customers

University of Leicester, NTT Communications ICT Solutions , City of Montebello, WGBH Boston , Italian Service Provider Zuchetti Informatica
Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust Bank
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
April 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.