Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cloudian HyperIQ vs PRTG Network Monitor comparison

Cloudian and Paessler GmbH are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cloudian is ranked #38 with an average rating of 10.0, while Paessler GmbH is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.7. Cloudian holds a 0.1% mindshare in IM, compared to Paessler GmbH’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cloudian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Paessler GmbH users who would recommend it.
Cloudian HyperIQ
Read 1 Cloudian HyperIQ review
  • 151 Views
  • 151 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
PRTG Network Monitor
Read 102 PRTG Network Monitor reviews
  • 8,952 Views
  • 5,371 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

PRTG Network Monitor and Cloudian HyperIQ compete in the network performance and monitoring category. Cloudian HyperIQ leads in data analytics capabilities, appealing to large-scale deployments, while PRTG is preferred for flexible monitoring and alerting.

Features: PRTG Network Monitor provides custom alerting, flexible sensors, and comprehensive monitoring across various devices. Its real-time monitoring is suitable for diverse network environments. Cloudian HyperIQ offers robust data analytics with integrated AI, granting deep insights into storage and network performance. Its strength lies in data analysis, making it suitable for organizations focused on large-scale deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward, intuitive deployment process with robust support, appealing to organizations for seamless integration. Cloudian HyperIQ requires more setup but provides excellent scalability and service tailored to larger infrastructures. PRTG's ease of use is attractive to smaller teams while Cloudian HyperIQ benefits enterprises needing extensive data analytics.

Pricing and ROI: PRTG Network Monitor is cost-effective for budget-conscious buyers, offering substantial ROI through flexible licensing and gradual scalability. Cloudian HyperIQ involves higher initial setup costs, justified by advanced features and high ROI potential in large-scale data environments. PRTG offers better value for mixed networks, while Cloudian HyperIQ stands out for data-driven performance insights.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 864,155 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloudian HyperIQ
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
38th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PRTG Network Monitor
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
102
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (5th), Cloud Monitoring Software (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cloudian HyperIQ is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PRTG Network Monitor is 4.4%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Kiran Rajanna - PeerSpot reviewer
Includes a Grafana dashboard that helps to improve monitoring and reporting
The installation process needs to be improved, and the tool needs a better script. Cloudian HyperIQ runs on Docker containers. Sometimes, the file system gets filled. The tool needs to have separate Docker volumes in the installation script. The documentation for reporting needs to be improved. I am not able to generate reports using it. The alert mechanisms also need to be improved. It should integrate with AI and give more metrics to be taken up next year. We can show the response peak as an improvement to our leadership.
Read full review
Noman-Saleem - PeerSpot reviewer
Detects suden changes but significant pricing concerns affect the effectiveness of network traffic troubleshooting
We use PRTG Network Monitor for monitoring traffic on interfaces and the behavior of network traffic. If there are sudden changes in traffic or any configuration issues, we can sort them out using PRTG. It's very helpful for troubleshooting and monitoring traffic utilization on our interfaces…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool has a very good interface and helps to monitor the nodes and resources. The most valuable feature is the S3 dashboard. It helps in migration, and we can monitor the data for at least three months."
"The most valuable features of PRTG Network Monitor are bandwidth utilization, user-friendliness, all past report simple retrievals, and timeout features. Additionally, if the solution does go down it is simple to bring it back."
"Good compilation of the system's information."
"Stable solution for monitoring networks and bandwidth, with multiple functions and features such as NetFlow Collector, graphical monitoring, etc."
"I can create my own program sensor. This means I can add extra monitoring capabilities into the already fundamentally strong foundation."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The bandwidth monitoring is a very attractive feature, it can tell you the bandwidth utilization while it is attempting to connect to the host for feedback."
"Every monitoring session features similar capabilities."
"The Slack integration is fantastic, and I've actually found it to be very useful recently."
More PRTG Network Monitor pros
 

Cons

"The installation process needs to be improved, and the tool needs a better script. Cloudian HyperIQ runs on Docker containers. Sometimes, the file system gets filled. The tool needs to have separate Docker volumes in the installation script. The documentation for reporting needs to be improved. I am not able to generate reports using it. The alert mechanisms also need to be improved. It should integrate with AI and give more metrics to be taken up next year. We can show the response peak as an improvement to our leadership."
"PRTG Network Monitor could improve interaction with customers by offering direct support involvement instead of just mail responses."
"The dashboarding definitely needs improvement."
"Their penetration within the market could be much better. If their pricing was lower, even though it's reasonable now, it might help them achieve this."
"PRTG does not allow us to scan devices like we can scan software or another problem in it. Also, I cannot draw graphical graphs in Woodview/look. Another problem is that we cannot draw a good diagram in PRTG."
"Users need to buy the more expensive licenses if they expect to be able to scale."
"I would like the ability to monitor Cisco IRS devices."
"I am not sure the solution is giving me all the needed feedback that we need. When something goes off on our IT infrastructure, it does tell me. However, it would be nice if it gave more intuitive information, e.g., the hard drive has gone up by 60 percent in an hour."
"The inventory of the device should be improved."
More PRTG Network Monitor cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cloudian HyperIQ's licensing is cheap."
"When you buy PRTG, everything comes in one bundle. Licensing is very easy."
"We have an unlimited license for this solution."
"Right now, the smallest sensor pack that they have is just a bit out of range for me, as a business. This kills me, as I need the product. Therefore, there is always a balance between needing to buy it or continuing their free version."
"We've got 1,000 nodes and I believe it's a few hundred quid a month."
"Cost was a factor when selecting this solution, but it just did everything we wanted it to do."
"The pricing is okay and it is cheaper than some competing products."
"While I am not the person who deals with pricing, I would say that we pay around 1000 pounds a year."
"PRTG Network Monitor is not that expensive, so I like it cost-wise. There's no additional cost apart from the standard licensing fees. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I would rate the cost of PRTG Network Monitor a two."
More PRTG Network Monitor pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user174738 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 31, 2015
Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor
I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cloudian HyperIQ?
The tool has a very good interface and helps to monitor the nodes and resources. The most valuable feature is the S3 dashboard. It helps in migration, and we can monitor the data for at least thre...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudian HyperIQ?
Cloudian HyperIQ's licensing is cheap.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cloudian HyperIQ?
The installation process needs to be improved, and the tool needs a better script. Cloudian HyperIQ runs on Docker containers. Sometimes, the file system gets filled. The tool needs to have separat...
See all answers
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
PRTG network monitor is one of the best tool i have ever used for the monitoring. It have auto discovery option. it avoid the configuring the device in PRTG. It automatically discover the device an...
See all answers
What do you like most about PRTG Network Monitor?
The tool is integrated with our email for the alerts.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PRTG Network Monitor?
The pricing is in the middle. It's not too high, nor too low, but it's reasonable.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs Cloudian HyperIQ Logo
Nagios XI vs Cloudian HyperIQ
Compared 63% of the time
More Cloudian HyperIQ Competitors
Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 8% of the time
PRTG Enterprise Monitor vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Enterprise Monitor vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 7% of the time
Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 6% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 6% of the time
LibreNMS vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LibreNMS vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 5% of the time
More PRTG Network Monitor Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
July 2025
Cloudian HyperIQ reportDownload Cloudian HyperIQ product report
Buyer's Guide
PRTG Network Monitor
July 2025
PRTG Network Monitor reportDownload PRTG Network Monitor product report
 

Also Known As

HyperIQ
No data available
 

Overview

Gain operational insights with Cloudian HyperIQ, a monitoring and predictive analysis tool. View data from across your Cloudian environment, including storage and networking. Set thresholds and alerts to highlight potential issues and identify corrective action. Within a single site or across multiple locations, HyperIQ gives you real-time insights.

Cloudian

PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.

To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.

Paessler GmbH
 

Sample Customers

University of Leicester, NTT Communications ICT Solutions , City of Montebello, WGBH Boston , Italian Service Provider Zuchetti Informatica
Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust Bank
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
July 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.