We compared Zabbix and Checkmk based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Zabbix stands out for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, customization options, and excellent customer service, while Checkmk is praised for its monitoring capabilities, reporting options, and ease of use. Zabbix users commend its performance and flexibility, while Checkmk users appreciate its ease of navigation and detailed reporting. Both products offer reasonable pricing and positive ROI, but Zabbix users suggest improvements in the user interface and integration capabilities, while Checkmk users seek enhancements in user-friendliness, documentation, alerts, and scalability.
Features: Zabbix stands out for its extensive customization options, while Checkmk impresses with its comprehensive reporting capabilities. In addition, Zabbix offers robust performance and intuitive dashboards, while Checkmk provides real-time insights and customizable reports.
Pricing and ROI: Zabbix offers a reasonably priced solution with a flexible licensing model, while Checkmk has found to be reasonable and affordable. Zabbix emphasizes a straightforward setup process, whereas Checkmk offers an easy setup process without any associated costs. Both products have received positive feedback from users regarding their setup cost., Zabbix users praise its performance and customization options, helping improve efficiency and prevent costly incidents. Checkmk users report significant improvements in monitoring efficiency and effectiveness, resulting in time and cost savings.
Room for Improvement: Zabbix users request improvements in user interface, documentation, customization options, and integration capabilities. Checkmk users express concerns about interface design, documentation, alerting system, scalability, and performance in larger networks.
Deployment and customer support: The reviews for Zabbix and Checkmk indicate that the time required to establish a new tech solution varies among users. Some users of Zabbix spent three months on deployment and a week on setup, while others required a week for both deployment and setup. Checkmk also had users reporting varying durations, with some taking three months for deployment and an additional week for setup, and others taking only one week for both. The context in which users use the terms "deployment" and "setup" should be considered when evaluating these timeframes., Zabbix's customer service is highly praised for their promptness, helpfulness, and strong commitment to resolving issues efficiently. Checkmk's customer service is appreciated for their prompt response, helpful assistance, and reliable solutions.
The summary above is based on 28 interviews we conducted recently with Zabbix and Checkmk users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"I really like the auto-discovery feature."
"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."
"We can monitor multiple sites using the product."
"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."
"It not only provides the preconfigured item monitoring feature, but it is also easy to configure custom items."
"We use Zabbix to monitor our organization's IT infrastructure and workstations. We don't use Microsoft Intune since it's expensive. The tool's real-time alerting system has proved crucial for us, particularly when a new device joins a network that is not one of our own devices. It notifies us about the presence of this new device, allowing us to investigate further. Additionally, it alerts us about disk usage, memory usage, and the software installed on the machine."
"The integration capabilities and APIs are the best part."
"I really enjoy network traffic triggers that allow us to check traffic threshold from ISP."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of virtual machines."
"The solution is open-source, easy to manage, and user-friendly making it easy for anyone to use."
"We are able to monitor our virtual infrastructure, virtual machines, windows servers, databases, and the network using a simple network management protocol. We are able to pull almost all the metrics that we want, receive notifications, and have them integrate with telegrams for certain devices that are critical, such as UPSs."
"Dashboard and the customization of the items and triggers are the most valuable features."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."
"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."
"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."
"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."
"Implementation is always tailored to the customer and the kind of information we need from the client to carry it out can make them very uncomfortable. Sometimes the clients are not ready to share it."
"Zabbix does not draw automatic mapping of the network, this is something they should add in the future. There is a lot of effort that is involved in tailoring some of the settings which could be made easier."
"Its UI should be improved. They did some improvements in version 5, but it could benefit from some more work. Its integrations should also be improved. They've been active for one year, and they seem to have noticed that. It has new integrations, but it could benefit from more integrations. As far as I know, there is no model to push statistics, metrics, or events towards Zabbix. This type of API isn't yet there, whereas some other tools provide an API for this."
"One of the things we don't like is that Zabbix has a license structure with a price that is high compared to the competition. It's very high, for example, compared to something like Microsoft Teams."
"The stability could be better."
"If Zabbix had a better dashboard then it would be nice."
"We had some scalability issues with a large number of nodes."
"The only improvement I would suggest, revolves around its AI and ML capabilities."
Checkmk is ranked 15th in Cloud Monitoring Software with 6 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 2nd in Cloud Monitoring Software with 98 reviews. Checkmk is rated 8.6, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Checkmk writes "A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Checkmk is most compared with Icinga, Netdata, Centreon, Nagios XI and PRTG Network Monitor, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios XI, Nagios Core and Amazon CloudWatch. See our Checkmk vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors, best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors, and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
