We performed a comparison between AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and VMware SRM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have never had any issues with scalability."
"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is a fairly stable solution."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward, it's not complex."
"The initial setup is really straightforward."
"For regular backup and restore solutions, this product is fine."
"It provides our disaster recovery solution. It works fine in our tests."
"It's on the cheaper side and not too expensive for users."
"The setup is pretty straightforward."
"The most valuable features are the disaster recovery and testing."
"The UI is very user-friendly and testing is easy."
"The product functionality is fairly high-quality."
"The solution is simple to use and has effective automation."
"The solution runs well in the background, just in case we need it."
"It is easy to implement for my clients."
"It made the DR process a lot faster and easier for recovery after we were familiar with the product operation."
"Virtual Machine Recovery during DR situation, with automation and easy to use menus and options."
"I set up a test, deleted the source, and went to fail it back, and it didn't work."
"The user interface, customer support, and the recovery time for the current customer query could use improvement."
"I would like to see better support for creating and working with archives."
"The solution's network setup and a lot of the control tower setup could be improved."
"The only thing I would like to see is, they don't have a formal ticketing system. There is no way I can go back and see what questions we had six months back, what issues we had, and how they were resolved."
"The UI could be a little sleeker."
"Sometimes a server will get a bit behind. "
"Definitely there should be better logging. From a customer perspective I would like to see more logs on what is happening. If there is an issue, I would like to know what the problem is. Right now, we have to depend on the support of the vendor to check and let us know, because we don't have access to a lot of logging information."
"The user experience could be more friendly."
"An improvement for SRM would be better interface compatibility with other products."
"In my opinion, the integration with Peer Persistent Storage could be improved."
"The biggest issue for us is that this product does not have any demo for customers."
"Flexibility to choose different PITs would be nice."
"There needs to be better stability during heavy capacity in future releases."
"The technical support is not quick enough to respond when a user tries to contact them."
"One thing which is lacking from the SRM is reporting."
More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is ranked 15th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 11 reviews while VMware SRM is ranked 6th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 69 reviews. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is rated 7.4, while VMware SRM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery writes "Free, easy to use, and offers good support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware SRM writes "A scalable solution that integrates well with the VMware platform, but its platform agnostics do not support on-cloud usage". AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is most compared with Azure Site Recovery, AWS Backup, Oracle Data Guard, VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery and Zerto, whereas VMware SRM is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, Azure Site Recovery and VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery. See our AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. VMware SRM report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.