No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CloudCheckr vs Kong Konnect comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.6
CloudCheckr CMx High Security users report significant ROI through reduced manual efforts, optimized spending, and automated invoicing.
Sentiment score
6.3
Kong Konnect improves efficiency with reduced debugging time, enhanced API performance, faster deployments, and increased revenue with fewer resources.
It has reduced manual efforts that would otherwise be spent checking where spending is occurring and ensuring all teams use resources correctly.
Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees
I have seen a return on investment of 100%, with significant cost avoidance and measurable savings within the first few months of deployment.
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
I've seen a return on investment, as the savings are concrete, measurable, and they show up directly in the AWS bill.
Top Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
Time saved is a relevant metric; it used to take us a week, but now it takes us only a day.
Lead Software Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
I have seen a return on investment with Kong Konnect, as it helps manage security very well, allows for faster API deployments saving developer time, and reduces salary costs with better uptime and minimal downtime, thus preventing potential business loss.
Solution Architect at Dhanyaayai enterprise private limited
I have seen the scalability of being able to manage 80 to 100-plus teams with a small team of about three or four people.
CTO at Keogh Innovation
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
CloudCheckr's customer service is praised for responsiveness, but some encounter delays requiring account rep involvement for resolution.
Sentiment score
7.8
Kong Konnect offers efficient, responsive customer service with rapid issue resolution and 24/7 support, praised for its global accessibility.
The additional support ended up taking longer than expected, with responses that did not meet our need for detailed and technical assistance.
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
Sometimes support needs to be reached, but they are very responsive and supportive.
Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees
The customer support for CloudCheckr is fantastic.
Director, Trust Operations Analytics at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Technical support from Proofpoint was absolutely excellent.
Senior Software Engineer at Netenrich
When I raise an incident or a support ticket, it gets answered in four hours.
API Technical Architect at Independent API Consultant
They offer twenty-four-hour support with SLA-based response times.
Solution Architect at Dhanyaayai enterprise private limited
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
CloudCheckr is praised for scalability and efficiency in managing diverse cloud environments despite concerns about handling large data volumes.
Sentiment score
7.8
Kong Konnect excels in scalable microservices, auto-scaling, and flexible cloud platform management, supporting seamless traffic control and automation.
If tomorrow I were to contract AWS or Google Cloud Services, I could manage them from the same place.
IT Director at Instituto de Innovacion Empresarial
It scales well for MSPs and large enterprises, allowing for management of hundreds of accounts and tens of thousands of resources while retaining performance and visibility.
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
The platform is fully scalable, providing various ways to manage data planes or runtimes.
IT Soulutoin Expert at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Kong Konnect's scalability is very high, handles growth well, and since it is a stateless gateway, it scales easily in Kubernetes using horizontal scaling.
Solution Architect at Dhanyaayai enterprise private limited
Kong Konnect is the control plane, and there is the ability to add more teams and more control planes based on the number of teams you have onboarding.
CTO at Keogh Innovation
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
CloudCheckr is a stable, reliable cloud optimization tool with high ratings, though minor issues and slow queries are noted.
Sentiment score
8.0
Kong Konnect is highly stable, effectively handling API-heavy environments with reliable performance and minimal disruptions.
CloudCheckr is stable and rock solid.
Top Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
It was very fast, and we did not experience any interruptions.
Senior Software Engineer at Netenrich
Kong Konnect is very stable with no issues regarding reliability in my experience.
Solution Architect at Dhanyaayai enterprise private limited
I've seen them run at major scale in large companies across the whole of Europe.
CTO at Keogh Innovation
 

Room For Improvement

CloudCheckr requires improved integration, easier use, better reporting, clearer pricing, faster performance, and enhanced tool compatibility.
Kong Konnect needs enhanced debugging, clearer UI, streamlined pricing, and better CI/CD integration to improve user experience.
CloudCheckr is a powerful and feature-rich tool with abundant metrics.
Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees
Another area is drift analysis; there have been complaints about tracking optimization opportunities, such as how to track opportunities identified in January and whether they were resolved in February.
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
The data does not work in real time; rather, it takes between one and three days to show you the usage.
IT Director at Instituto de Innovacion Empresarial
The licensing model could be simplified, especially in how they charge and track usage.
IT Soulutoin Expert at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
When comparing documentation, Kong's documentation is not on par with Google, Amazon, or other cloud providers.
API Technical Architect at Independent API Consultant
Token integration presents challenges and has implementation complexities that need addressing.
Solution Architect at Dhanyaayai enterprise private limited
 

Setup Cost

CloudCheckr offers competitive, tiered pricing aligned with Azure consumption, providing good value and requiring a CloudCheckr CMx license.
Kong Konnect's mixed user experiences stem from straightforward setup but high pricing and unclear cost structures concern enterprises.
Overall, the pricing was quite convenient and represented good value for money.
Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees
Pricing is feature-tiered under the MSP licensing, and I would say the pricing was quite competitive and fair.
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
I won't pretend it's cheap, but we've saved multiples of what we pay for it, so the conversation with finance is straightforward.
Top Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
Pricing was the issue as it becomes very expensive due to the nature of local circumstances.
Senior Software Engineer at Netenrich
I wouldn't say that the setup cost is much more compared to using any other product.
CTO at Keogh Innovation
While the pricing model isn't very clear on how usage is tracked, the initial cost and setup for using Kong Konnect are reasonable.
IT Soulutoin Expert at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
 

Valuable Features

CloudCheckr offers simplicity, cost visibility, actionable insights, multi-cloud integration, and security, leading to significant savings and efficiency.
Kong Konnect simplifies API management with seamless integration, robust security, and hybrid deployment, boosting productivity and collaboration.
The cost visibility and reporting are really valuable, and the dashboard is informative and enables good decision-making.
Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees
What makes CloudCheckr easy for me to use is its intuitive interface.
Director, Trust Operations Analytics at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
The best features CloudCheckr offers include out-of-the-box security and compliance check features that provide over 35 different types of compliance checks at no cost, best practice checks, and alerts.
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
The documentation is excellent, and it includes a developer portal, which helps create a common distribution channel for APIs within and outside the enterprise.
IT Soulutoin Expert at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
When I mention scalability, it means that when we experience peak traffic, Kong made it easy for us to scale and spawn new machines.
Lead Software Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
The security features of Kong Konnect have helped my team mainly by allowing us to use auth and JWT for applications needing external identity provider authentications, such as LDAP or other authentication providers that need to be connected to back-end applications.
Solution Architect at Dhanyaayai enterprise private limited
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudCheckr
Ranking in AI Observability
19th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Management (9th), Cloud Cost Management (9th), Managed Cloud Services (5th)
Kong Konnect
Ranking in AI Observability
16th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
API Management (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the AI Observability category, the mindshare of CloudCheckr is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kong Konnect is 0.6%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Observability Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Kong Konnect0.6%
CloudCheckr0.6%
Other98.8%
AI Observability
 

Featured Reviews

AbhishekGupta2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
Centralized cloud costs have boosted savings while reporting and user experience still need work
The best features CloudCheckr offers include out-of-the-box security and compliance check features that provide over 35 different types of compliance checks at no cost, best practice checks, and alerts. Another valuable feature is the multi-cloud overview, providing unified reporting across AWS and Azure while allowing us to create different types of dashboards based on who logs into the platform. Additionally, from an MSP standpoint, there is good ease of deployment, especially the billing and chargeback functionality for a reseller or managed services provider. CloudCheckr has positively impacted my organization by helping us manage multiple customers and tens of thousands of resources while retaining performance and visibility due to its multi-cloud support. We do not have to worry about jumping from one platform to another, and the better MSP support is beneficial from a billing and chargeback automation standpoint. The integration in compliance helps identify missing areas within our customer environments and improves them. On average, it has helped us provide approximately 15 to 20% savings through right-sizing or idle resource elimination. These are some of the immediate cost savings our customers have experienced after implementing recommendations from the tool.
AK
CTO at Keogh Innovation
Centralizes API and AI control planes and has enabled federated self-service for many teams
The whole area of API and AI management is quite complex, with so many different ways of being able to do things. I think a positive of Kong is that it's so configurable and extendable, but that is also a con because there are so many ways of achieving the same thing that I think often people are either confused or struggle to get going as to how to solve a particular problem. In my mind, a more opinionated deployment of Kong itself or even how to solve certain use cases would be something I would like to see, so a more opinionated use of their products and configuration of their products on how to solve the most common use cases. That's probably the main thing about needed improvements for Kong Konnect. It's a pretty fully-fledged platform; there obviously are portions of it that could be improved. But I think overall as a platform, it's really good, and I think it can help the majority of organizations looking to manage their throughput of APIs or AI traffic. The majority of what I've said before probably covers the improvements needed for Kong Konnect. There probably are some API Ops and AI Ops changes that could be improved, which is not necessarily the Kong Konnect product, but some of the toolchains around it. I'm thinking around, especially if it's API Ops, about topics like better GitOps processes and the ways of being able to roll back changes when there are issues. At the moment, a lot of that is either non-existent or is hand-cranked. I would like to see the ability to roll back configurations when there are issues being added to the product.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Observability solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
15%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing reflects that it uses custom pricing based on your cloud spend, which is pretty standard for this category. I won't pretend it's cheap, but we'...
What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?
The interface could be improved because it is too dense and overloaded with too many charts and too much information on each screen. Latency is also something important to take into account. The da...
What is your primary use case for CloudCheckr ?
My main use case for CloudCheckr is checking the Azure cloud costs of my SaaS service. A specific example of how I use CloudCheckr to check those Azure cloud costs with my SaaS service is that my A...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kong Konnect?
Regarding my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing, I find that the pricing can be made more transparent and more helpful for enterprise integration.
What needs improvement with Kong Konnect?
I would recommend that Kong add the capability to sort the routes by name, date, or size, as the current setup does not support this. I would suggest that Kong make the routes or services appear in...
What is your primary use case for Kong Konnect?
We use Kong Konnect primarily for centralized API management, API security, Kubernetes ingress management, traffic control, observability, and governance across multiple environments. Additionally,...
 

Also Known As

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudCheckr vs. Kong Konnect and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.