CloudBolt vs Red Hat CloudForms comparison

CloudBolt and Red Hat are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. CloudBolt is ranked #29, while Red Hat is ranked #35. CloudBolt holds a 2.1% mindshare in CM, compared to Red Hat’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of CloudBolt users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

CloudBolt

Read 8 CloudBolt reviews

1,121 Views
964 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Red Hat CloudForms

Read 10 Red Hat CloudForms reviews

799 Views
791 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

CloudBolt

Red Hat CloudForms

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudBolt and Red Hat CloudForms are prominent players in the cloud management solutions market. CloudBolt appears to have the upper hand in pricing and support, while Red Hat CloudForms offers richer features.

Features: CloudBolt integrates with various cloud platforms, offering flexibility and scalability. It provides automation tools for hybrid environments and simplifies management. Red Hat CloudForms emphasizes strong security features and comprehensive monitoring, ideal for large enterprises. The core difference lies in CloudBolt’s focus on automation as opposed to CloudForms’s emphasis on security.

Room for Improvement: CloudBolt could enhance its feature set to better accommodate enterprise-specific needs, improve its security features, and expand its monitoring capabilities. Red Hat CloudForms could work on simplifying its deployment process, improve customer service responsiveness, and offer more flexible pricing options to better suit small to mid-sized companies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudBolt is known for its easy deployment process and responsive customer service, allowing quick adaptation. Red Hat CloudForms involves a more complex deployment due to extensive customization options, requiring more time and a skilled IT team.

Pricing and ROI: CloudBolt offers a flexible and cost-effective pricing model, providing a quicker ROI for smaller companies. Red Hat CloudForms requires higher initial setup costs but offers substantial long-term ROI for larger enterprises capable of leveraging its features fully.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudBolt vs. Red Hat CloudForms Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudBolt vs. Red Hat CloudForms

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,036 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudBolt

Ranking in Cloud Management

29th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Cost Management (45th)

Red Hat CloudForms

Ranking in Cloud Management

35th

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudBolt is 2.1%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat CloudForms is 1.6%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CloudBolt	2.1%
Red Hat CloudForms	1.6%
Other	96.3%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

AdeolaEkunola

Director at NIGERCUBES LTD

The solution offers reliable resource control but needs to improve its UI

Cloudbox is just an abstraction software. There is no need for scalability. It's quite a simple solution. You might only need to increase the resources you apply to the CloudBold deployment. If, for example, the number of users increases, you might have to check the recommendations from CloudBolt and act accordingly. We have over 100 internal users. Regarding the infrastructure it sits on, the solution sits on the private of the on-prem, a VMware infrastructure that stands across two sites, the DR and the main production. We have over 60 ESXi of Asterisk and about 500 or 1,000 virtual machines.

Read full review

Ilhami Arikan

Cloud Services Automation Technologies Manager at Garanti Teknoloji

A stable solution that helps to provision servers

We use the solution to provision servers. I am impressed with the product's ability to create dynamic catalogs. The solution's provisioning engine needs to be improved. I would rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten. I would rate the product's scalability a seven out of ten and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Hybrid cloud platform for VM and app deployment and management, with very good stability. It's customizable, easy to set up, and can be deployed within half an hour."

"The initial deployment was super easy."

"The solution's biggest advantage is flexibility"

"I find the self-service features valuable."

"Role-based access control and application blueprinting."

"They are a very mature product."

"The optimization of the solution is quite interesting."

"The stability of the solution is very good. We haven't had any issues with it."

"I am impressed with the product's reports."

"Red Hat CloudForms is a stable product. There is no issue with the stability."

"The most valuable features of Red Hat CloudForms are the benefit of the collective functionality."

"The multi-tenancy feature has been very helpful for our clients. It has been working fine and seamlessly for them. Its interface is also very simplified, and it is also an open and easy-to-scale solution."

"I am impressed with the product's ability to create dynamic catalogs."

More Red Hat CloudForms pros

Cons

"The scheduling feature of CloudBolt needs improvement because sometimes, it doesn't work."

"The management of SaaS must be improved."

"Could increase the number of integrations and add more out-of-the-box work flows."

"The area of integrating on-prem and cloud needs improvement."

"The solution is not easy to use. It's not intuitive enough to click anywhere in the solution and make it work."

"Because the solution needs to integrate with other products that surround it, there is a lot of configuration required, and this can be quite complex. It's not as easy as it is with, for example, VMware."

"I have issues with the solution's permissions. Unlike VMware, the product doesn't allow folder-type permissions."

"It is difficult to create a complete dashboard that includes all the needed features or catalogs."

"Red Hat CloudForms could improve by allowing more customization of reports. We have to do a lot of coding to accomplish what we want. Additionally, the compatibility with the multi-cloud could improve. The latter versions of the solution removed Google support and the cost comparison between other clouds was high."

"The solution's provisioning engine needs to be improved."

"The complexity of the solution is a bit high in comparison to VMware."

"The problem is that the platform requires it to be maintained and updated. Also, a few cases are still pending with the Red Hat support team since they are not closed yet."

"Our clients had challenges or issues with the updates. Its updates should be better managed. They should provide quicker and more stable updates. Its stability can also be better. We initially faced ease-of-use and compatibility issues while integrating it. We had a lot of compatibility issues with other products. Our clients are concerned about whether it is under IBM or it is still Red Hat. Clients are not very clear about the support, and they're not really happy with it. Currently, they're getting support from Red Hat, but going forward, they're not really clear about what would be the life cycle of the product, which is a concern for them."

More Red Hat CloudForms cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten because the solution is expensive."

"The system is cheaper if a customer has fewer servers since you pay by the node."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The price of Red Hat CloudForms was not competitive, it was expensive."

"Red Hat CloudForms has a subscript-based pricing model. The cost is approximately $20,000 annually which allows you to use as many users as you want."

"Red Hat CloudForms is a bit expensive."

"It is definitely cheaper than VMware. Everything is included. There is no challenge there."

"The product's licensing is based on the number of servers."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

University

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	7

Comparisons

Morpheus vs CloudBolt

Compared 30% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudBolt

Compared 8% of the time

BMC Helix Cloud Security vs CloudBolt

Compared 7% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs CloudBolt

Compared 6% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs CloudBolt

Compared 6% of the time

More CloudBolt Competitors

VMware Cloud Director vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 12% of the time

Morpheus vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 11% of the time

CloudStack vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 10% of the time

More Red Hat CloudForms Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudBolt

January 2026

Download CloudBolt product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat CloudForms

January 2026

Download Red Hat CloudForms product report

Overview

CloudBolt supports a variety of cloud technologies, from on-premises virtualization and private cloud to a wide range public and hybrid cloud configurations.

No need to rip-and-replace. CloudBolt provides easy import, syncing, and management of legacy deployments even as it helps you build out new cloud environments.

CloudBolt lets administrators create and maintain configuration standards while developing a reusable library of service and application templates.

CloudBolt

Manage container, virtual, private, and public cloud infrastructures

Managing a complex, hybrid IT environment can require multiple management tools, redundant policy implementations, and extra staff to handle the operations. Red Hat® CloudForms simplifies IT, providing unified management and operations in a hybrid environment.

As your IT infrastructure progresses from traditional virtualization toward an Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) model, CloudForms evolves, protecting your investments and providing consistent user experience and functionality.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

WM, CyWest, Panic, Camden, University of Maryland, Xerox, Neustar, Medidata, Continu, Aruba Networks, Neuberger Berman, Peak6, EverBank, Ascensus, Hosting Edge

Cox Automotive, Penn State, FICO, G-ABLE, Seneca College, ITandTEL, The Paris Lodron University of Salzburg (PLUS), MyRepublic, Macquarie, The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, CBTS, Network Data Solutions (NDS)

Buyer's Guide

CloudBolt vs. Red Hat CloudForms

December 2025

Free Report: CloudBolt vs. Red Hat CloudForms

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBolt vs. Red Hat CloudForms and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudBolt vs. Red Hat CloudForms report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.