CloudBolt vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth comparison

CloudBolt and VMware are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. CloudBolt is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5, while VMware is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0. CloudBolt holds a 2.6% mindshare in CM, compared to VMware’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of CloudBolt users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of VMware users who would recommend it.

CloudBolt

Read 8 CloudBolt reviews

1,255 Views
1,117 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Read 9 VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth reviews

1,448 Views
840 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

CloudBolt

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudBolt and VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth are competitive products in the cloud management space. CloudBolt leads in pricing with cost-effective solutions and strong customer support, while VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is favored for its superior features and comprehensive capabilities.

Features: CloudBolt provides extensive automation capabilities, integration with diverse toolsets, and flexible deployment environments. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth excels in in-depth financial management, advanced optimization tools for cloud resources, and detailed visibility into resource usage.

Room for Improvement: CloudBolt could enhance its feature set for resource optimization, offer more comprehensive visibility tools, and provide advanced financial management capabilities. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth could improve its deployment simplicity, broaden its automation capabilities, and enhance integration flexibility with diverse toolsets.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudBolt is known for its straightforward deployment process and efficient customer service. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth requires a more complex setup that may need specialized knowledge, though it provides excellent ongoing support.

Pricing and ROI: CloudBolt offers competitive setup costs with a swift ROI through its cost-effective management solutions. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth involves a higher initial investment but promises substantial ROI through detailed resource management and optimization features.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudBolt vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudBolt vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudBolt

Ranking in Cloud Management

19th

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Ranking in Cloud Management

22nd

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudBolt is 2.6%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is 1.9%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CloudBolt	2.6%
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth	1.9%
Other	95.5%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

AdeolaEkunola

Director at NIGERCUBES LTD

The solution offers reliable resource control but needs to improve its UI

Cloudbox is just an abstraction software. There is no need for scalability. It's quite a simple solution. You might only need to increase the resources you apply to the CloudBold deployment. If, for example, the number of users increases, you might have to check the recommendations from CloudBolt and act accordingly. We have over 100 internal users. Regarding the infrastructure it sits on, the solution sits on the private of the on-prem, a VMware infrastructure that stands across two sites, the DR and the main production. We have over 60 ESXi of Asterisk and about 500 or 1,000 virtual machines.

Read full review

Steve Staten

Cloud Advisor Specialist at Converge Technology Solutions Corp

The solution has excellent scalability, great dashboards, and is stable

I use the solution daily, multiple hours a day to identify possible savings by analyzing the various displays as well as the policies for possible cost savings for our customers CloudHelth has helped our organization with trying to right-size virtual machines based on current utilization and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Role-based access control and application blueprinting."

"Hybrid cloud platform for VM and app deployment and management, with very good stability. It's customizable, easy to set up, and can be deployed within half an hour."

"I find the self-service features valuable."

"The solution's biggest advantage is flexibility"

"The initial deployment was super easy."

"The product is easy to use in terms of monitoring all the environments. It works for multiple clouds."

"It's stable. For report presentation, it's been fast."

"The solution is useful for cloud transparency and visibility in reports and dashboards that I have generated, especially the pre-populated dashboards."

"We are able to create an internal price of the product that we can then sell to clients. We get the cost plan at a good discount and then resell it with a mark up to our enterprise-level clients. This flexibility in pricing is one of the solution's best features."

"We use dashboards quite heavily, but one of the features that have really stood out is some of the policies we've created to alert us of particular situations."

"The most valuable thing I have found is the cost saving recommendations"

"This solution is fast and very easy to understand, even if you are not a technician."

"The pricing is rather competitive right now."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth pros

Cons

"The scheduling feature of CloudBolt needs improvement because sometimes, it doesn't work."

"The management of SaaS must be improved."

"The solution is not easy to use. It's not intuitive enough to click anywhere in the solution and make it work."

"The area of integrating on-prem and cloud needs improvement."

"Could increase the number of integrations and add more out-of-the-box work flows."

"They should provide information or tools to tune the cloud resources according to the environment size."

"The export features regarding CSV files and specifically around identifying savings plans have room for improvement, as well as the drill-down features for reservation utilization."

"The Perspectives feature could be better."

"The solution doesn't offer the best functionality, unfortunately. Some features just simply aren't on offer. The solution needs to offer more product milestones."

"CloudHealth needs to start building out Turbonomics-types of features that help the customers who are using CloudHealth really understand everything down to the server level, the virtual machine level."

"I would like to see better integration from CloudHealth to create easier setup and implementation."

"If you are working with the OS you need help and other connectors to get more information."

"The performance and accuracy of Cloud Health need to be improved."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten because the solution is expensive."

"The system is cheaper if a customer has fewer servers since you pay by the node."

"There could be flexibility in pricing for the product."

"The pricing is competitive and while other products are good they are considerably more expensive."

"I give the cost of the solution an eight out of ten."

"The licensing fees depend on how big the company is. If you are a larger company then you have a better contract with a better price. The price is different for a small company."

"CloudHealth has a subscription-based model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

Manufacturing Company

University

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudBolt?

I find the self-service features valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudBolt?

I rate the pricing an eight out of ten because the solution is expensive. The license is expensive to acquire.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudBolt?

The area of integrating on-prem and cloud needs improvement. Another area that the solution needs to improve on is the UI. The UI can be much better.

See all answers

What do you like most about CloudHealth?

The product is easy to use in terms of monitoring all the environments. It works for multiple clouds.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudHealth?

There could be flexibility in pricing for the product. They should provide information or tools to tune the cloud resources according to the environment size. It will help us get the right cost. Ad...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudHealth?

I rate VMware Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Morpheus vs CloudBolt

Compared 54% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudBolt

Compared 10% of the time

BMC Helix Cloud Security vs CloudBolt

Compared 9% of the time

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs CloudBolt

Compared 7% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs CloudBolt

Compared 5% of the time

More CloudBolt Competitors

Cloudability vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 22% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 18% of the time

Azure Cost Management vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 17% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 10% of the time

AWS Trusted Advisor vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 6% of the time

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudBolt

September 2025

Download CloudBolt product report

Buyer's Guide

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

August 2025

Download VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth product report

Also Known As

No data available

Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, CloudHealth

Overview

CloudBolt supports a variety of cloud technologies, from on-premises virtualization and private cloud to a wide range public and hybrid cloud configurations.

No need to rip-and-replace. CloudBolt provides easy import, syncing, and management of legacy deployments even as it helps you build out new cloud environments.

CloudBolt lets administrators create and maintain configuration standards while developing a reusable library of service and application templates.

CloudBolt

VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, formerly known as VMware Aria Cost Powered by CloudHealth, is a specialized cloud management platform tailored for Multi-Cloud Cost Optimization. It offers comprehensive visibility into cloud spending across various providers, enabling users to identify areas for optimization and make informed resource allocation decisions. With features like reserved instance management, resource rightsizing, and automated cost governance policies, it facilitates financial management for optimal cost efficiency. Beyond cost optimization, Tanzu CloudHealth enhances cloud operations through workload optimization and governance automation, catering to multi-cloud environments encompassing public, private, and hybrid clouds. Its primary focus remains on enabling organizations to effectively manage and reduce cloud expenditures while supporting operations across diverse cloud platforms.

VMware

Sample Customers

WM, CyWest, Panic, Camden, University of Maryland, Xerox, Neustar, Medidata, Continu, Aruba Networks, Neuberger Berman, Peak6, EverBank, Ascensus, Hosting Edge

Pinterest, Dow Jones, RhythmOne, Ziff Davis, Acquia, Mentor Graphics, Lookout, Veracode, SwiftKey, Amtrak, Shi, Imgur, SumoLogic, NewsUK, Cloudera, Canvas

Buyer's Guide

CloudBolt vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

August 2025

Free Report: CloudBolt vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBolt vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudBolt vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors and best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.