Cisco Wireless WAN vs HPE Wireless WAN comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless WAN and HPE Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Wireless WAN vs. HPE Wireless WAN Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Our university has experienced a positive return on investment, and I believe Cisco Wireless WAN will continue to benefit us for at least a decade.""We don't see many troubleshooting issues. Normally, it's a user error when it comes to the JSS or the VPN. Once they log into the system or they get on the internet, then they log directly into the JSS, so they can do their work.""Cisco Wireless WAN's best feature is the integration with other Cisco products.""We have found that the product scales well.""Cisco Wireless WAN's most valuable feature is it is robust.""The devices are all of good quality.""Cisco Wireless WAN's best features are simple management, the cloud base, dashboards, and reliability.""The network management is good. We use it to control access, channels, and phones and limit bandwidth."

More Cisco Wireless WAN Pros →

"The solution is easy to use.""HPE Wireless is easy to use. Integration is not an issue. It is easy to integrate HPE Wireless with any operating system and other brands of switches.""The reliability is good.""It is a new product backed by HPE's expertise in networking and telecommunications. We can also work with 3Com products.""Setting up the solution initially is very easy.""What's most valuable in HPE Wireless WAN is that it works fine for customers with existing HPE controllers.""It is a good and stable solution.""The most important is that the solution is stable."

More HPE Wireless WAN Pros →

Cons
"The worst thing about the Cisco controllers is that they only have two ports.""The solution could lower its pricing to make it more affordable.""It is expensive.""The interface is a little bit difficult to understand at times. It would be good if Cisco were to make it user friendly so that everyone can easily configure it without the need to do certifications and courses to learn how to use all of the devices.""The reporting feature needs improvement, especially adding information with regards to availability uptime.""The prices are high and should be reduced in order to be more competitive.""You cannot go to different versions or different access points. 9115s cannot interact with 9120s, and 9130s can interact with 9115s. You can add or remove as many subordinates as you want.""Cisco Firewall cannot recognize some applications and that makes dealing with policies difficult. Even when we whitelist, it does not work well."

More Cisco Wireless WAN Cons →

"The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further.""HPE should improve performance and stability.""The scalability is good, but it could improve.""It should be a faster device.""The installation is easy. However, my implementation is complicated and you would need special training to complete it.""Scalability is an aspect of this product that should be improved.""The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly.""It's very old-fashioned, which is why we have made the decision to replace it."

More HPE Wireless WAN Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is very expensive."
  • "Cisco is more expensive than other solutions."
  • "This is a very expensive solution but there are no additional costs."
  • "It was a one time fee and there are no costs in addition to this."
  • "There is a license that is needed for the use of this solution."
  • "The pricing is good."
  • "The pricing is based on how much is ordered from the vendor and what type of discount they receive."
  • "If you have a two-person team doing the physical access point installations, they should be able to set up 10 to 20 access points per day."
  • More Cisco Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I find the price to be reasonable."
  • "Price wise, it is on the medium end of the scale. It could be lower."
  • "We don't pay a licensing fee, we purchased the product."
  • "There is a license for this solution and the license is normally paid annually but this depends on the contract."
  • "The solution is quite expensive. You have to pay for every node and it can get expensive fast, it is approximately £3,000 per month."
  • "We have been satisfied with the price."
  • "The price of HPE Wireless WAN is high."
  • "Customers pay for HPE Wireless WAN based on the contract. It's usually paid yearly. There's an additional cost, particularly for the hardware."
  • More HPE Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The cost is based on the features offered in the product. According to the features that my institution wants, we selected the product. There is no need to make any payments on a yearly basis towards… more »
    Top Answer:Aruba has taken over HPE, and my institution is still evaluating HPE Wireless WAN. The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the… more »
    Ranking
    4th
    out of 10 in Wireless WAN
    Views
    2,755
    Comparisons
    451
    Reviews
    38
    Average Words per Review
    361
    Rating
    8.2
    8th
    out of 10 in Wireless WAN
    Views
    92
    Comparisons
    64
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    321
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Wireless WAN, HP Wireless WAN
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cisco Wireless WAN refers to the wireless networking solutions provided by Cisco Systems, a leading technology company specializing in networking and communication products. Cisco Wireless WAN enables organizations to establish wireless connections and extend their wide area network (WAN) connectivity using cellular networks.

    Cisco Wireless WAN solutions leverage cellular technologies, such as 4G LTE and 5G, to provide high-speed and reliable wireless connectivity. These solutions offer a range of features and capabilities that enhance network performance, security, and manageability.

    Cisco Wireless WAN Features & Benefits:

    • Enhanced Connectivity: Enables wireless connections over cellular networks for areas with limited wired connectivity.
    • High-Speed Data Transfer: Delivers fast data transfer rates for efficient file transmission and real-time collaboration.
    • Increased Mobility: Extends network connectivity to mobile devices and remote locations.
    • Reliable and Resilient Connectivity: Ensures reliable and uninterrupted connectivity with intelligent routing and failover capabilities.
    • Security and Data Protection: Integrates robust security features to safeguard data transmitted over the wireless network.
    • Centralized Management: Provides centralized control and visibility through management platforms like Cisco DNA Center and Cisco Meraki Dashboard.
    • Integration with Cisco Ecosystem: Seamlessly integrates with other Cisco networking solutions for a comprehensive network infrastructure.
    • Scalability: Scales to accommodate growing connectivity needs without compromising performance.
    • Application Optimization: Prioritizes critical applications and optimizes traffic for improved performance.
    • Industry Compatibility: Suitable for various industries, including enterprises, service providers, and government agencies.

    Cisco Wireless WAN empowers organizations with reliable, secure, and scalable wireless connectivity, enabling mobility and enhancing network performance and productivity.

    Reviews from Real Users

    PeerSpot user, Manager - Technology at a tech services company, states that "Recently, the most valuable and in-demand feature that users are enjoying is WiFi 6 support on the access points. The other good thing about Cisco Wireless LAN is how easily it provides clean access to the WiFi network."

    Muhammad Alim Besari, Solution Architect at Packet System Indonesia, says that “Cisco Wireless LAN deliver the best wireless experience yet so easy to operate and manage.”

    Zulfiqar Saeed, SE at The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, writes that "The most valuable features of Cisco Wireless WAN are its security functionality. We have a lab environment and we have to provide different authentications to the users which are easy to manage. Additionally, there is a lot of useful automation embedded into the system."

    HPE Wireless WAN, a Software-Defined WAN dynamically selects the best path for each app based on policies and real-time network measurements. Flexibly and securely connect users to apps with higher visibility into vital traffic. WAN Portfolio include the following: HPE OfficeConnect OC20 802.11ac Series Access Points, HPE FlexNetwork MSR2000 Router Series, HPE FlexNetwork HSR6800 Router Series and HPE FlexNetwork VSR1000 Virtual Services Router Series.
    Sample Customers
    Aegean Motorway, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Brunel University London, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Chartwell School, Children's Hospital Colorado, Cisco Live Milan, City of Biel, City of Mississauga, Dundee Precious Metals, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Erickson Living, Goldcorp, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS)
    Bell Canada
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Educational Organization15%
    Government12%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company89%
    Educational Organization1%
    Manufacturing Company1%
    Comms Service Provider1%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Government10%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Educational Organization10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business4%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise94%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business47%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise27%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cisco Wireless WAN vs. HPE Wireless WAN
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Wireless WAN vs. HPE Wireless WAN and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Wireless WAN is ranked 4th in Wireless WAN with 60 reviews while HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 8th in Wireless WAN with 16 reviews. Cisco Wireless WAN is rated 8.2, while HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless WAN writes "It's a reliable, user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". Cisco Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Fortinet FortiExtender and Ubiquiti Wireless, whereas HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN. See our Cisco Wireless WAN vs. HPE Wireless WAN report.

    See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.

    We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.