We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The reliability is good."
"HPE Wireless is easy to use. Integration is not an issue. It is easy to integrate HPE Wireless with any operating system and other brands of switches."
"Setting up the solution initially is very easy."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability."
"It is a good and stable solution."
"The tool is easy to manage."
"The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the size of the outdoor access points. It's great and you can disguise them quite well."
"Radio management is a valuable feature of the solution."
"The technical features are very good and it's very useful if you need a wireless solution."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN’s most valuable feature is unleashed."
"The feature I like most, is the product activity."
"The connectivity, speed, and reliability are very good."
"The most valuable feature of Ruckus Wireless WAN is the antenna technology."
"The analytic solution is good and should be improving further."
"The scalability and the support could be better."
"HPE should improve performance and stability."
"The tool must warn the management about unwanted traffic."
"The scalability is good, but it could improve."
"The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"Technical support could be improved. They could respond a bit faster."
"It's very old-fashioned, which is why we have made the decision to replace it."
"HPE Wireless WAN could provide better access points and better pricing."
"I believe there is room for improvement in the price structure."
"The captive portal should be more customizable because right now, it is very limited."
"The solution needs to offer more analytics."
"So far, I find Ruckus Wireless WAN okay in terms of the technology and existing business network, but licensing could be more flexible, especially the IoT license that was changed to adapt to the IoT Controller and sensor subscription. The previous licensing method for Ruckus Wireless WAN was better. In my opinion, it wasn't a good decision to change it because the customer prefers the previous licensing over the current licensing. It's not only about the money in terms of licensing, but also about flexibility. The latest license change isn't as flexible. I also found the cloud solution not partner-friendly, so that could also be improved. Another area for improvement in Ruckus Wireless WAN is answering partner requests because currently, it doesn't seem easy for them. What I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is the AP having its MQTT forwarder. Ruckus Wireless WAN AP supports IoT modules now and to use the IoT modules, you need all IoT data to pass through the IoT Controller. If I could forward that IoT data directly to my environment, similar to what you can do with other solutions, that would be great."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN we have a lot of component shortages in the world. This has impacted deliveries. We have large back orders of the solution."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN needs to improve its pricing."
"They could include a firewall feature in the next release but even there it's not really necessary"
"We have one sole distributor here in our region. To have multiple distributors here would be very helpful to improve the supply chain."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 8th in Wireless WAN with 17 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with , whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless and Cambium Networks Wireless WAN. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
