Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HPE Wireless WAN vs Ruckus Wireless WAN comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Ruckus are both solutions in the Wireless WAN category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.0, while Ruckus is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 2.7% mindshare in Wireless WAN, compared to Ruckus’s 29.4% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Ruckus users who would recommend it.
HPE Wireless WAN
Read 22 HPE Wireless WAN reviews
  • 273 Views
  • 254 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
Ruckus Wireless WAN
Read 57 Ruckus Wireless WAN reviews
  • 2,247 Views
  • 2,180 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

HPE Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN are competitors in the wireless networking market, each offering unique strengths. HPE Wireless WAN holds an edge with its robust features and competitive pricing, whereas Ruckus distinguishes itself with versatile deployment options and strong support, making it an attractive long-term choice.

Features: HPE Wireless WAN is noted for its advanced network management capabilities, integrated security solutions, and strong performance in complex environments. Ruckus Wireless WAN offers high-performance access points, adaptive antenna technology, and reliable connectivity, focusing on hardware innovation and dependable performance.

Room for Improvement: HPE Wireless WAN could enhance its deployment ease for non-enterprise environments and optimize its hardware for broader use cases. Ruckus Wireless WAN might work on reducing initial setup costs, improving integration with third-party platforms, and expanding its feature set to accommodate emerging technologies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ruckus Wireless WAN simplifies deployment with intuitive tools, ensuring ease of setup even in large setups, and offers responsive customer service. HPE Wireless WAN also supports straightforward deployment but is more tailored to enterprise scenarios, requiring expert intervention at times, coupled with comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Wireless WAN provides competitive pricing, emphasizing value-rich solutions for enterprise clients, with an enhanced ROI through comprehensive features and long-term support. Ruckus Wireless WAN, with potentially higher startup costs, ensures significant ROI with enduring hardware performance and reduced operational disruptions, making it worth the investment for organizations seeking steady network performance.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN Report (Updated: November 2025).
Buyer's Guide
HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN
November 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 873,085 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ruckus Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Wireless WAN category, the mindshare of HPE Wireless WAN is 2.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ruckus Wireless WAN is 29.4%, down from 37.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Ruckus Wireless WAN29.4%
HPE Wireless WAN2.7%
Other67.9%
Wireless WAN
 

Featured Reviews

DineshDas - PeerSpot reviewer
Centralized features have simplified deployment and improved day-to-day network management
One of the best features of HPE Wireless WAN is Wi-Fi Direct, as it provides dual-band frequency and helps to connect Bluetooth with IoT devices. I am comfortable with this feature and find it beneficial for connectivity. I use centralized management features such as WLC. They have improved operational efficiency significantly. It is one of the best tools we have for centralized management because it is easy to manage, manually delete, and create sites. This makes it easy to implement policies across the network. I see measurable benefits from this centralized solution, which is quite easy to handle as people are comfortable managing the tool. Users do not need hardcore technical expertise to operate it on a day-to-day basis, making it quite comfortable.
Read full review
Said Souhaiel - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy for us to apply and change parameters or consult the quality
I recommend using Ruckus. First of all, the cost and the price are okay compared to Cisco or Huawei. Secondly, the use is easy, and we have a significant result in terms of quality and signal level. We use it as an access point to provide Internet coverage for the public We have a few on-site…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
"The solution is easy to use."
"HPE Wireless is easy to use. Integration is not an issue. It is easy to integrate HPE Wireless with any operating system and other brands of switches."
"We've found the scalability to be good."
"It is a good and stable solution."
"They have improved operational efficiency significantly; it is one of the best tools we have for centralized management because it is easy to manage, manually delete, and create sites."
"The support has been responsive and helpful."
"The WiFi and high scalability are the most valuable features."
More HPE Wireless WAN pros
"The most valuable feature is the good coverage of about 60 meters."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN is highly regarded for managing network performance. They have simplified the configuration and installation processes, making it straightforward. It works out of the box; you just configure it, and there's minimal need for minor adjustments."
"Its benefits include efficient zone deployment and access point distribution, simplifying network management."
"Tech support is good."
"One of the standout features is the ease of installation and commissioning, making the whole process very straightforward."
"One of the best features of Ruckus Wireless WAN that customers are interested in is the adaptive antenna called BeamFlex. Ruckus Wireless WAN also has the best management platform, and even if there are thousands of users of the solution, it's very easy to manage on Ruckus Wireless WAN. It can also support third-party equipment. It's an all-in-one solution and it has IoT and secure access capabilities. Upgrading the network to Ruckus Wireless WAN is also easy."
"The stability provided is very nice."
"The solution can scale well."
More Ruckus Wireless WAN pros
 

Cons

"Mostly, I face problems with client connectivity and some devices, like Android."
"HPE should improve performance and stability."
"The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"There are some areas that need improvement, such as connectivity issues and additional features that other products have."
"The solution works smoothly unless more than twenty users connect to a single access point, at which point it becomes overloaded."
"The tool must warn the management about unwanted traffic."
"The scalability is good, but it could improve."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced."
More HPE Wireless WAN cons
"The initial setup is complex."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN needs to improve its pricing."
"The direct support needs improvement."
"The controller could be made less complicated, so those who are less technically sound can maintain it."
"The support could be faster. It takes time for them to reply."
"There is a need for more flexibility in granular access control."
"The connectivity and mobility for users could be improved."
"There could be more power supply for the radio features."
More Ruckus Wireless WAN cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license cost of the product falls under the category of a moderately priced tool."
"The solution is quite expensive. You have to pay for every node and it can get expensive fast, it is approximately £3,000 per month."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN is high."
"I find the price to be reasonable."
"If you are concerned with your budget, then you can go for the cheaper model."
"There is a license for this solution and the license is normally paid annually but this depends on the contract."
"The price is perfect for me."
"We have been satisfied with the price."
More HPE Wireless WAN pricing and cost advice
"The cost of licensing varies."
"Compared with Cisco Wireless WAN, the pricing for Ruckus Wireless WAN is two out of five. Ruckus Wireless WAN is twice the price of Cisco Wireless WAN."
"It is less expensive than Aruba and Cisco."
"The cost is quite high, and over the past year, there has been a substantial increase, nearly reaching around seventy percent."
"You have to pay for the controller with Ruckus, whereas with Ubiquiti, it comes for free."
"The solution is very competitively priced."
"The product is available at a very good price, but it is not cheap compared to tools like Unifi. I believe it is a very good product for the price that it is offered to users."
"The product's pricing is aggressive."
More Ruckus Wireless WAN pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Comms Service Provider
15%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business35
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise13
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE Wireless WAN?
The tool is easy to manage.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Wireless WAN?
The price is compatible and not an issue for us.
See all answers
What needs improvement with HPE Wireless WAN?
I am not in a position to fully address what can be improved for HPE Wireless WAN currently. However, there are some areas that need improvement, such as connectivity issues and additional features...
See all answers
Is Ubiquiti Wireless better than Ruckus Wireless WAN?
Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up and is an excellent option for small businesses, offering enterprise features for a one-time fee and no ongoing licensing fees. Ubiquiti Wireless is ve...
See all answers
What do you like most about Ruckus Wireless WAN?
Ruckus Wireless WAN is an easy-to-use solution.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ruckus Wireless WAN?
These are not cheap access points. If you want to go cheap, Ubiquiti is an option. I knew they were worth it because once deployed, they wouldn't require additional attention. They're not at Cisco ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Ubiquiti Wireless vs Ruckus Wireless WAN Logo
Ubiquiti Wireless vs Ruckus Wireless WAN
Compared 86% of the time
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs Ruckus Wireless WAN Logo
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs Ruckus Wireless WAN
Compared 11% of the time
Cisco Wireless WAN vs Ruckus Wireless WAN Logo
Cisco Wireless WAN vs Ruckus Wireless WAN
Compared 3% of the time
More Ruckus Wireless WAN Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Wireless WAN
October 2025
HPE Wireless WAN reportDownload HPE Wireless WAN product report
Buyer's Guide
Ruckus Wireless WAN
October 2025
Ruckus Wireless WAN reportDownload Ruckus Wireless WAN product report
 

Also Known As

Wireless WAN, HP Wireless WAN
No data available
 

Overview

HPE Wireless WAN, a Software-Defined WAN dynamically selects the best path for each app based on policies and real-time network measurements. Flexibly and securely connect users to apps with higher visibility into vital traffic. WAN Portfolio include the following: HPE OfficeConnect OC20 802.11ac Series Access Points, HPE FlexNetwork MSR2000 Router Series, HPE FlexNetwork HSR6800 Router Series and HPE FlexNetwork VSR1000 Virtual Services Router Series.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Ruckus Wireless’s WAN (Wide Area Network) suite of switches and solutions provides companies and organizations with a wide variety of products that enable them to deploy and manage the kinds of WANs that best meet their needs. Ruckus Wireless is a leader in the field of WAN creation, deployment, and management. Their solutions are designed with the user in mind. They are sleek products and solutions that are easy for administrators to use and maintain. This makes it a valuable suite for any and every kind of industry. The level of ease that it provides makes it possible for companies and organizations to reap a high level of benefit from whichever product they choose to use. 

Ruckus Wireless WAN Benefits

Some of the benefits of using the Ruckus Wireless WAN suite of switches and solutions include:

  • Simplified network deployment and management. Ruckus Wireless WAN uses Campus Fabric technology to create a streamlined network creation and management process. This technology takes many of the processes used to create and manage networks that usually require many different solutions and combines them so that a single solution can accomplish the same amount of work.
  • The ability to operate on a massive scale. The Ruckus Wireless SmartZone 100 solution gives administrators the power to handle 1,024 access points and 25,000 users from a single device. Companies can operate at a high level with fewer devices than their competitors require to accomplish a similar level of work.
  • Ease of use. Solutions like RuckusZoneDirector 1200 can be easily deployed and used by administrators who may not have a background in the use of wireless solutions. Companies that choose Ruckus Wireless WAN do not need to train administrators to deploy it. This makes it extremely valuable to companies looking to keep their budgets to a minimum. 

Ruckus Wireless WAN Features

Organizations that choose to use the Ruckus Wireless WAN suite of switches and solutions have a large number of capabilities from which they can choose. 

  • Centralized network management.  Ruckus Wireless WAN’s RUCKUS Network Director feature enables administrators to manage their networks from a single location. All of the controls and data that users need to monitor and control the network can be managed from one interface.
  • Advanced security features. Ruckus Wireless WAN has the capability to encrypt and demand that traffic that is trying to pass through the network be authenticated before it is allowed access. This protects the data that leaves the network and the network itself.

  • Seamless interoperability. The various solutions and products that make up Ruckus Wireless’s WAN solution suite have the ability to integrate and operate together seamlessly. Users can mix and match solution pieces to best fit their needs.

Reviews from Real Users

Ruckus Wireless’s WAN suite is a truly versatile selection of solutions that offer users a complete package of capabilities and features. This suite makes it possible for users to meet all of their networking needs. Their wireless access points are the kind that is mostly employed in industries like resorts, which have to cater to large volumes of people over extended periods of time. They provide companies with the highest possible level of coverage. Users working in any number of fields would find Ruckus Wireless to be up to the task of handling their networking needs. This suite is appropriate for large corporations and small businesses alikes. 

An information technology project manager at a university writes, “The actual wireless access points themselves are very powerful. We get very good coverage from just one access point.  The throughput is very good and the centralized management is excellent.  Also, the ease of deployment is very good.”

A video conferencing administrator at a technology services company states, “The solution is suitable for many types of environments, such as small businesses.”

Ruckus
 

Sample Customers

Bell Canada
American University of Sharjah, Dordt College, Drew University, Lamar University, Raroa School
Buyer's Guide
HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN
November 2025
Free Report: HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.