We performed a comparison between Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and HPE Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the way that it integrates with the ClearPass security system on-site."
"An engineer with enough experience can tune the network however they want. It's crucial. It's good to customize our information security how we like it and configure the solution to achieve the level of stability we need."
"The solution is easy to use."
"Aruba is a very stable system."
"It's stable and reliable."
"The most valuable feature is reliability."
"Its most valuable feature is the ease of use."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability."
"We've found the scalability to be good."
"The most important is that the solution is stable."
"What's most valuable in HPE Wireless WAN is that it works fine for customers with existing HPE controllers."
"The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
"The main benefit of this product is the lifetime warranty, up to 99 years. For example, if your switch card fails after 10 years, and the hardware fails, it will be replaced with the very same switch or the equivalent model available at the time."
"The support has been responsive and helpful."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility."
"If they provided more updates that would be ideal."
"Sometimes, the configuration part of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN can be complex, and if you fail to understand the product at once, you may not even know about some features that you can apply to your network, and they may go unused."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing, it's quite a premium."
"Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is expensive."
"Deployment can take some time if you haven't planned well."
"In the next release, the security should be improved by including support for WPA3."
"They have to work on their Aruba Central cloud platform. There are still some glitches such as not showing proper user details. When we removed the AP from the Aruba Central cloud, it showed up as being connected to Aruba Central. They need to fix these issues."
"It would be better for customers if Aruba provided more license options, like 5-year licenses"
"HPE Wireless WAN could provide better access points and better pricing."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced."
"I would say that the integration with other vendors in areas such as management or the visibility of other vendors in the management tools could be improved."
"In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
"The scalability is good, but it could improve."
"The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further."
"The installation is easy. However, my implementation is complicated and you would need special training to complete it."
"Technical support could be improved. They could respond a bit faster."
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 46 reviews while HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 8th in Wireless WAN with 16 reviews. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Ubiquiti Wireless, Fortinet FortiWLM and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, whereas HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN. See our Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. HPE Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.