We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability."
"The main benefit of this product is the lifetime warranty, up to 99 years. For example, if your switch card fails after 10 years, and the hardware fails, it will be replaced with the very same switch or the equivalent model available at the time."
"The performance is good."
"It is a new product backed by HPE's expertise in networking and telecommunications. We can also work with 3Com products."
"It's easy to use."
"The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
"It is a good and stable solution."
"The solution is easy to use."
"It offers very good pricing."
"The setup is quite simple."
"I like that it's cheaper and inexpensive. It's also easy to use."
"It allows us to offer policy control."
"Ubiquiti outdoor access points in particular, are really stable, and if there are no obstructions, Ubiquiti works well."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of setup."
"One of the nice features is the backup version control."
"The scalability of Ubiquiti Wireless is very good. We can add and transfer access points, it is highly scalable."
"HPE should improve performance and stability."
"The installation is easy. However, my implementation is complicated and you would need special training to complete it."
"Stability could be improved, and technical support needs to be faster."
"It should be a faster device."
"It's very old-fashioned, which is why we have made the decision to replace it."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced."
"The tool must warn the management about unwanted traffic."
"HPE Wireless WAN could provide better access points and better pricing."
"I would prefer if the solution offered more integration capabilities."
"They should make more advanced features for the power users. I am a technician and I am functional, but I do need some features that I find only in Microsoft."
"The solution has very good product lines. However, it feels like some models overlap. For example, a new model is announced after three months, and another new model is announced shortly after. So, the release cycle feels too short, and some features overlap. Overall, the products are very good and reliable."
"There is really nothing wrong with the product but there are ways the utility and features can be expanded to meet future demands."
"Ubiquiti is also slow to adopt new technologies. We are transitioning to Wi-Fi 6, and there aren't many products. They have mostly Wi-Fi 5 products, but there are only two Wi-Fi 6 products. It's okay for places we have already equipped, but it's a bit hard for new places."
"I would like to see this solution have any kind of captive portal on the tool or user accounting tool. This would be quite useful for companies."
"The control system can be improved by making it easier."
"Their stock is a bit low compared to others, making it difficult to purchase."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 8th in Wireless WAN with 17 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Aruba Wireless and ExtremeCloud IQ. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.