Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HPE Wireless WAN vs Ubiquiti Wireless comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ubiquiti Wireless
Ranking in Wireless WAN
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
76
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Wireless WAN category, the mindshare of HPE Wireless WAN is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ubiquiti Wireless is 39.7%, up from 39.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN
 

Featured Reviews

SunilNair2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable wireless connectivity supports seamless hospital staff mobility
We use HPE Wireless WAN for hospital purposes. In our hospital, all the staff have laptops and move around, hence the need for wireless connectivity. We also provide guest access to patient rooms, including ICU rooms, where patients stay HPE Wireless WAN provides reliable connectivity. We use it…
Alejandro Del Rosal - PeerSpot reviewer
Software controller is very nice and provides excellent performance
Ubiquiti products are really good. I am a B2B wholesaler, and my type of business requires profit to sell to my installers or for my installers to sell to the end customers. Right now, Ubiquiti doesn't offer that. They are selling the product on their website. We face difficulties with Ubiquiti's supply chain because their products are usually out of stock. I would recommend Ubiquiti Wireless as a brand. However, we are no longer recommending it in my business. I am a wholesaler who recommends installing wireless or network solutions for other companies. I no longer recommend Ubiquiti Wireless because it is not profitable. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool is easy to manage."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The WiFi and high scalability are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility."
"I like their features, such as reliability and high availability."
"The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability."
"The main benefit of this product is the lifetime warranty, up to 99 years. For example, if your switch card fails after 10 years, and the hardware fails, it will be replaced with the very same switch or the equivalent model available at the time."
"HP Wireless offers competitive pricing compared to Cisco and Fortinet."
"It functions properly and includes centralized management for access points and switches."
"The solution offers us good situational awareness by providing information on user activity, signal strength, and all the data that you need to manage the system and understand issues."
"The pricing of the solution is excellent. It offers a great value."
"The stability and performance are great."
"This is a high-quality solution that allows us to provide wifi access points in challenging areas."
"I like the price, quality, and consistency of manufacturing."
"Installation is easy with seamless integration of additional APs."
"In general, the setup process is straightforward."
 

Cons

"It's very old-fashioned, which is why we have made the decision to replace it."
"The sales sync should connect with and sync up with the customers."
"Scalability is an aspect of this product that should be improved."
"HPE should improve performance and stability."
"The tool must warn the management about unwanted traffic."
"Technical support could be improved. They could respond a bit faster."
"In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
"Mostly, I face problems with client connectivity and some devices, like Android."
"Difficult to see error logs and locate the problem."
"Sometimes we have some micro breaks we do not know what causes them."
"The solution should offer simpler management for guests. That would be helpful in the hospitality industry, for example."
"Ubiquiti could develop a more elaborate firewall solution. Their firewall solutions at the moment are entry-level. Maybe they don't want to bring those products in because many people prefer putting a third-party firewall into a solution like that. We usually do."
"The biggest downfall is support."
"The product lacks some security features."
"My company has to wait for a response from the product's support team. From an improvement perspective, the product's support team should be quicker to respond."
"Everything needs to be professionally done."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I find the price to be reasonable."
"The solution is quite expensive. You have to pay for every node and it can get expensive fast, it is approximately £3,000 per month."
"Customers pay for HPE Wireless WAN based on the contract. It's usually paid yearly. There's an additional cost, particularly for the hardware."
"The license cost of the product falls under the category of a moderately priced tool."
"There is a license for this solution and the license is normally paid annually but this depends on the contract."
"If you are concerned with your budget, then you can go for the cheaper model."
"Price wise, it is on the medium end of the scale. It could be lower."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN is high."
"The price of Ubiquiti Wireless is affordable, we pay approximately $100 and $150 per access point."
"The tool doesn't have any licensing costs."
"In South Africa, for some Cisco access points, it will cost you 10,000 Rand ($690 USD), whereas with Ubiquity that same access point will cost you less than 3,000 Rand ($210 USD)."
"Ubiquiti Wireless has reasonable pricing."
"Ubiquiti Wireless is affordable."
"The price of the solution is high and could be cheaper."
"It's a cost-effective solution."
"There aren't any license costs attached to the product."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HPE Wireless WAN?
Stability is an issue, as the access point becomes overloaded with more than twenty connections. Additionally, the current product uses two antennas. Increasing to four antennas could benefit us.
Is Ubiquiti Wireless better than Ruckus Wireless WAN?
Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up and is an excellent option for small businesses, offering enterprise features for a one-time fee and no ongoing licensing fees. Ubiquiti Wireless is ve...
Which is better - Cambium or Ubiquiti Wireless?
For me, Ubiquiti was easy to install, configure, set up, and maintain, while also providing solid coverage and better handoffs between APs. This is especially relevant if you are using Apple produc...
Which is better - Ubiquiti Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Ubiquiti Wireless offers a wide range of WLAN products. We tested their devices before ultimately choosing Cisco Meraki. Ubiquiti devices have good outdoor performance and the connection is very st...
 

Also Known As

Wireless WAN, HP Wireless WAN
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bell Canada
NASCAR Grand-AM, Maritime Parc, Outdoor Music Festival, British Armed Forces, Arcadia School District, Moscow - Enforta
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.