

InfluxDB and Cisco UCS Manager are both prominent products in the enterprise IT landscape, specializing in time series data management and server infrastructure management, respectively. While InfluxDB is noted for its adaptability and cost-effectiveness, Cisco UCS Manager is favored for its comprehensive feature set in large-scale environments.
Features:InfluxDB focuses on real-time data processing, high scalability for time series data, and advanced analytics capabilities. Cisco UCS Manager provides unified server hardware management, automated provisioning, and a policy-driven configuration system.
Room for Improvement:InfluxDB could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with other enterprise systems, improved support for multi-region deployments, and expanded security features. Cisco UCS Manager might improve in terms of more streamlined initial setup processes, better integration with third-party applications, and more intuitive user interfaces for administrators.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:InfluxDB offers a straightforward deployment model, benefiting from a cloud-native architecture that simplifies initial setup and ongoing management, backed by strong customer support. Cisco UCS Manager requires a more detailed setup due to its focus on comprehensive hardware integration; however, its support capabilities help offset the complexity by assuring smooth management of large installations.
Pricing and ROI:InfluxDB is recognized for offering competitive pricing that emphasizes high ROI, particularly through efficient time series data handling. Cisco UCS Manager, despite higher costs, provides value through improved infrastructure efficiency and reduced long-term operational costs, making it appealing for larger enterprises with complex needs.
There's no need for an extra management device or virtual machine, as everything runs within the fabric interconnect.
Cisco UCS Manager provides cost savings by reducing the time support staff spend on long deployments.
InfluxDB reduced my time to show data without any interruption, also reducing the number of people needed to manage the project; it is very good to have InfluxDB in my project.
For a severity one case, a call ensures immediate assistance and resolution of the matter.
With Intersight, service requests are automatically generated, enhancing the user experience and providing timely resolutions.
Regarding Cisco tech, they are pretty good.
Adding new chassis and extra blades is streamlined.
I would rate the scalability at nine out of ten, probably.
The main challenge with InfluxDB, which is common with all databases, was handling very high throughput systems and high throughput message flow.
We’ve scaled on volume with seven years of continuous data without performance degradation.
InfluxDB's scalability is fine for me; I gather a lot of metrics and have not had any issues.
If there's a really complex problem, I would probably give it a ten since it gets escalated quickly.
It serves as the backbone of our application, and its stability is crucial.
It is very stable, with no reliability or downtime in InfluxDB.
After integrating Kafka, it never broke again, as Kafka handled messages and metrics appropriately, decreasing the message throughput.
We would benefit from advancements in AI that offer firmware recommendations automatically, reducing the need for human intervention and vendor communication.
It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite confusing.
While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the tabs would enhance user experience.
InfluxDB deprecated FluxQL, which was intuitive since developers are already familiar with standard querying.
Having a SQL abstraction in InfluxDB could be beneficial, making it more accessible for teams that prefer querying with SQL-style syntax.
It could include automated backup and a monitoring solution for InfluxDB or a script developed by a REST API.
Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offers like buying three servers and getting one free, along with UCSC and fabric included for free.
As long as they can afford it, there is a setup cost involved.
We use the open-source version of InfluxDB, so it is free.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for InfluxDB was great, as I did not use any license.
It supports ease of deployment, allowing for quick mass deployments in the data center, saving time and resources by doing so from a remote location.
Whenever there's a failure of any component, it's very easy to swap because you just disassociate that profile, remove the faulty blade, connect the new blade, and associate that profile, maintaining the same MAC address and worldwide port name.
One of the valuable features is the user interface base, specifically the C user interface.
The most important feature for us is low latency, which is crucial in building a high-performance engine for day trading.
InfluxDB’s core functionality is crucial as it allows us to store our data and execute queries with excellent response times.
It helps me maintain my solution easily because it is very reliable, so we didn't face any performance issues or crashes regarding our queries; we can get the results very fast.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco UCS Manager | 1.3% |
| InfluxDB | 0.5% |
| Other | 98.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
InfluxDB is open-source software that helps developers and enterprises alike to collect, store, process, and visualize time series data and to build next-generation applications. InfluxDB provides monitoring and insight on IoT, application, system, container, and infrastructure quickly and easily without complexities or compromises in scale, speed, or productivity.
InfluxDB has become a popular insight system for unified metrics and events enabling the most demanding SLAs. InfluxDB is used in just about every type of industry across a wide range of use cases, including network monitoring, IoT monitoring, industrial IoT, and infrastructure and application monitoring.
InfluxDB offers its users:
InfluxDB Benefits
There are several benefits to using InfluxDB . Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
InfluxDB stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its data aggregation feature.
Shalauddin Ahamad S., a software engineer at a tech services company, notes, “The most valuable features are aggregating the data and the integration with Grafana for monitoring.”
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.