Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Encryption category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0, while Broadcom is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.5. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 2.1% mindshare in EE, compared to Broadcom’s 9.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Check Point Full Disk Encry...
Read 17 Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade reviews
  • 337 Views
  • 173 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Symantec Endpoint Encryption
Read 37 Symantec Endpoint Encryption reviews
  • 1,522 Views
  • 1,073 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Symantec Endpoint Encryption and Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade compete in the full disk encryption category. While Symantec is noted for its feature-rich integration with enterprise solutions, Check Point is favored for its hard disk protection and management efficiency.

Features: Symantec Endpoint Encryption stands out with its robust asset identification and antivirus integration, appealing to large enterprises as an all-in-one solution. Its cloud features enhance user security seamlessly. In contrast, Check Point Full Disk Encryption excels in centralized management, pre-boot authentication, and non-intrusive encryption, adding a strategic layer of protection against unauthorized access.

Room for Improvement: Symantec could benefit from broader product integration and more responsive technical support. Users also mention the complexity of installation and administration in on-premises settings. For Check Point, users seek better decryption performance and enhanced documentation. The cost can be prohibitive, suggesting a need for more affordable solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec is often deployed on-premises with hybrid cloud options, though its technical support has varying reviews concerning responsiveness. Check Point offers private cloud and on-premises deployments with reliable customer service, though quick response times are occasionally lacking. Its centralized deployment is appreciated in large IT environments.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec's competitive pricing is acknowledged by large enterprises, despite perceptions of higher costs due to bundled licensing. It offers substantial ROI through enhanced productivity. Check Point is seen as expensive with a complex pricing structure, affecting its appeal to smaller budgets despite effective data protection and security offerings.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Full Disk Encry...
Ranking in Endpoint Encryption
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Data Protection (4th)
Symantec Endpoint Encryption
Ranking in Endpoint Encryption
5th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Encryption category, the mindshare of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is 2.1%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Encryption is 9.2%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Encryption
 

Featured Reviews

Danit Sannikov - PeerSpot reviewer
Can be well-integrated with the existing systems in a company and is very intuitive to use
I once faced a problem with the tool, but I remember that I managed to work without a VPN, and then the problem with the product was sorted out somehow. An option to connect not only with the username and password but also through SMS in an easy manner is something that needs to be added to the tool. When I changed the way I connect to the tool to the SMS option, I did it because I bought a new phone, and it had a problem connecting with the tool, after which I had to go to the settings to change it, so I felt it was not very intuitive. In other platforms, the user will have two options to connect, one of which is with a username and password, and the other one is with an SMS.
Read full review
Bharath Kumar Gajula - PeerSpot reviewer
Robust data protection with user-friendly deployment, competitive pricing, and comprehensive features like customizable alerts and effective detection capabilities but needs GUI improvements
The stability is relatively good. Occasionally, certain clients may experience disconnection from the management servers, requiring a manual process to rectify. Even in instances where the link is severed, restoring client connectivity can be challenging, sometimes necessitating the uninstallation and reinstallation of the software. Additionally, when clients go out of sync, we do not receive alerts, indicating an area for potential improvement. I would rate it seven out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution provides complete security for one's workstation."
"It's easily scalable and adaptable to the needs of the business."
"It has addressed storage and data transfer demands efficiently."
"The encryption ensures each of our drives is not invasive and that the user does not have a bad experience even while the drive is being encrypted."
"It keeps the devices well monitored."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is hard disk protection."
"Its ability to provide a security layer of encryption that allows us to prevent unauthorized access to computers."
"Encryption prevents data loss which can cost the organization a lot of resources."
More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade pros
"Disk encryption and file and folder encryption are the most valuable and used features. It is also very well integrated with Symantec Messaging Gateway and Symantec DLP, which is helpful in protecting any kind of information that goes outside. Symantec DLP catches an email and sends it to the encryption server. The encryption server encrypts the email and intimates to the user that confidential information is being sent out. The administrator can then take appropriate action."
"One notable aspect is the ability to customize alerts and other settings."
"Overall Symantec Endpoint Encryption is a reasonable solution."
"I like the management aspect of this solution. You don't want to have end-users tweak or set it themselves, so the fact that you could do it from a central point helped us a lot."
"The most valuable features are the messaging features and shared folders."
"Its management is good, and it is also scalable and mostly stable."
"It is stable."
"It is fairly stable."
More Symantec Endpoint Encryption pros
 

Cons

"The response time for technical support could be faster."
"In the future, I would like to see is the ability to decrypt equipment."
"While the solution works as it should, it is overly expensive."
"I rate the support from Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade a six out of ten."
"They should improve the interface and make it a little more user-friendly."
"You do need to be careful that you don't mess too much with the endpoint, or you might have issues with the work stations."
"When I changed the way I connect to the tool to the SMS option, I did it because I bought a new phone, and it had a problem connecting with the tool, after which I had to go to the settings to change it, so I felt it was not very intuitive."
"The tool is too expensive to be an add-on to the main solution. They could launch it independently so that costs can be lowered."
More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade cons
"The security could be improved."
"It was hard to install and took us about three months."
"Its remote deployment should be improved. Currently, there is no remote deployment for Symantec Endpoint Encryption. You have to install it manually. There are some issues with AD integration and the time taken to reflect a password on the Endpoint Encryption Manager when a new user has changed the password, but they are already working on these issues, and these will be resolved in the next release."
"One feature that is lacking is integration with Symantec Information Centric (ICT). As it is now, I don't see how to integrate the encryption with ICT, and in my opinion this is an area that certainly requires encryption, even though it's no longer supported by Broadcom."
"Upgrades from one version to another may only sometimes be straightforward, especially if one needs a clearer understanding of the process."
"What I didn't find helpful in the version we used is the fact that all devices had to be on the same network for us to push through the encryption."
"If for example, a user forgets the endpoint key, they cannot access their data. We need a support team that is a single point of contact for the IT entity to be trained and to have documentation for troubleshooting and managing the solution."
"They have too high of a price tag. That's why they're losing the market share."
More Symantec Endpoint Encryption cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As it costs $125 per workstation per year, something which is above the price of what the competition is charging, the solution is definitely too expensive."
"The licensing costs yearly are $5000."
"The cost of this solution is a little on the higher side."
"Depending on how many modules you will use (up to five) the licensing will be more expensive."
"The solution is good, but it is more expensive than other solutions in the market. Other solutions, such as BitLocker are less expensive."
"There is a license required for this solution."
"It can be expensive. However, if you plan to scale or are at a large enterprise company, this product could be what you need."
"Symantec Endpoint Encryption is not expensive."
"Although the performance and stability of this solution are good, our challenge is the price tag. You buy the solution once, but you also have to keep on buying the licenses yearly."
More Symantec Endpoint Encryption pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
27%
Security Firm
9%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?
It is a cross-platform tool.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?
The cost of licenses depends on the characteristics or implementation you are looking for.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?
I once faced a problem with the tool, but I remember that I managed to work without a VPN, and then the problem with the product was sorted out somehow. An option to connect not only with the usern...
See all answers
How does Microsoft BitLocker compare with Symantec Endpoint Encryption?
Microsoft BitLocker is very intuitive and easy to maintain. It is basically the global standard solution for drive encryption and it successfully fulfills regulatory needs in terms of data protecti...
See all answers
What do you like most about Symantec Endpoint Encryption?
Antivirus, URL filtering, and firewall protection are the most effective features for data protection.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Endpoint Encryption?
I am not sure about the pricing and licensing cost of Symantec Endpoint Encryption.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft BitLocker vs Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade Logo
Microsoft BitLocker vs Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade
Compared 76% of the time
McAfee Complete Data Protection vs Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade Logo
McAfee Complete Data Protection vs Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade
Compared 24% of the time
More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade Competitors
Microsoft BitLocker vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption Logo
Microsoft BitLocker vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption
Compared 77% of the time
McAfee Complete Data Protection vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption Logo
McAfee Complete Data Protection vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption
Compared 9% of the time
ESET Endpoint Encryption vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption Logo
ESET Endpoint Encryption vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption
Compared 8% of the time
Stormshield Data Security vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption Logo
Stormshield Data Security vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption
Compared 6% of the time
More Symantec Endpoint Encryption Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade
April 2025
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade reportDownload Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade product report
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Endpoint Encryption
April 2025
Symantec Endpoint Encryption reportDownload Symantec Endpoint Encryption product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Symantec Drive Encryption
 

Overview

The Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade provides automatic security for all information on endpoint hard drives, including user data, operating system files and temporary and erased files. For maximum data protection, multi-factor pre-boot authentication ensures user identity, while encryption prevents data loss from theft.
Learn more about Full disk encryption.

Check Point Software Technologies
Symantec Drive Encryption, powered by PGP technology provides organizations with strong full-disk and removable media encryption and the ability to integrate with Symantec Data Loss Prevention. Intuitive management enables enterprise scale deployments and features compliance-based, out-of-the-box reporting plus customizable reports. Management capabilities include support for native OS encryption (FileVault2) and Opal compliant self-encrypting drives.
Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
Citrix Systems Inc., City of Lansing, Commercial & Industrial Property, France T_l_visions, Fujian Mobile Co. Ltd., Group Lotus plc, Hall Booth Smith & Slover, P.C. (HBSS), Portugal Telecom, PostFinance, Public Pension Agency
Buyer's Guide
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption
April 2025
Free Report: Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption report.
See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.