Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Encryption category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0, while Broadcom is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 2.2% mindshare in EE, compared to Broadcom’s 9.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Check Point Full Disk Encry...

Read 17 Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade reviews

334 Views
153 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Read 37 Symantec Endpoint Encryption reviews

1,378 Views
951 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Check Point Full Disk Encry...

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Symantec Endpoint Encryption and Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade compete in the full disk encryption category. While Symantec is noted for its feature-rich integration with enterprise solutions, Check Point is favored for its hard disk protection and management efficiency.

Features: Symantec Endpoint Encryption stands out with its robust asset identification and antivirus integration, appealing to large enterprises as an all-in-one solution. Its cloud features enhance user security seamlessly. In contrast, Check Point Full Disk Encryption excels in centralized management, pre-boot authentication, and non-intrusive encryption, adding a strategic layer of protection against unauthorized access.

Room for Improvement: Symantec could benefit from broader product integration and more responsive technical support. Users also mention the complexity of installation and administration in on-premises settings. For Check Point, users seek better decryption performance and enhanced documentation. The cost can be prohibitive, suggesting a need for more affordable solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec is often deployed on-premises with hybrid cloud options, though its technical support has varying reviews concerning responsiveness. Check Point offers private cloud and on-premises deployments with reliable customer service, though quick response times are occasionally lacking. Its centralized deployment is appreciated in large IT environments.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec's competitive pricing is acknowledged by large enterprises, despite perceptions of higher costs due to bundled licensing. It offers substantial ROI through enhanced productivity. Check Point is seen as expensive with a complex pricing structure, affecting its appeal to smaller budgets despite effective data protection and security offerings.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,585 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Full Disk Encry...

Ranking in Endpoint Encryption

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Data Protection (5th)

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Ranking in Endpoint Encryption

5th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Endpoint Encryption category, the mindshare of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is 2.2%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Encryption is 9.4%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Encryption

Featured Reviews

Danit Sannikov

Project manager at SII

Can be well-integrated with the existing systems in a company and is very intuitive to use

I once faced a problem with the tool, but I remember that I managed to work without a VPN, and then the problem with the product was sorted out somehow. An option to connect not only with the username and password but also through SMS in an easy manner is something that needs to be added to the tool. When I changed the way I connect to the tool to the SMS option, I did it because I bought a new phone, and it had a problem connecting with the tool, after which I had to go to the settings to change it, so I felt it was not very intuitive. In other platforms, the user will have two options to connect, one of which is with a username and password, and the other one is with an SMS.

Read full review

Bharath Kumar Gajula

Network Security Architect at Capgemini

Robust data protection with user-friendly deployment, competitive pricing, and comprehensive features like customizable alerts and effective detection capabilities but needs GUI improvements

The stability is relatively good. Occasionally, certain clients may experience disconnection from the management servers, requiring a manual process to rectify. Even in instances where the link is severed, restoring client connectivity can be challenging, sometimes necessitating the uninstallation and reinstallation of the software. Additionally, when clients go out of sync, we do not receive alerts, indicating an area for potential improvement. I would rate it seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"They have Disc Encryption, Anti-Malware, and a VPN Blade which is beneficial for us."

"Its ability to provide a security layer of encryption that allows us to prevent unauthorized access to computers."

"End-to-end encryption provides full disk encryption, ensuring that all data on the device, including the operating system."

"This encryption is relatively fast and really covers the needs required."

"The product's initial setup phase is totally fine."

"It has addressed storage and data transfer demands efficiently."

"The encryption ensures each of our drives is not invasive and that the user does not have a bad experience even while the drive is being encrypted."

"It helps us maximize the operational efficiency and performance of our activities."

More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade pros

"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."

"The most valuable feature is that it works in the background so that the end-users are not aware of what is happening on the laptop."

"Overall Symantec Endpoint Encryption is a reasonable solution."

"I like the management aspect of this solution. You don't want to have end-users tweak or set it themselves, so the fact that you could do it from a central point helped us a lot."

"We use it for protecting accounts, which is its most valuable feature."

"It is stable."

"Their cloud features such as Cloud Endpoint security, ransomware modules, malware, and other modules are very effective."

"Disk encryption and file and folder encryption are the most valuable and used features. It is also very well integrated with Symantec Messaging Gateway and Symantec DLP, which is helpful in protecting any kind of information that goes outside. Symantec DLP catches an email and sends it to the encryption server. The encryption server encrypts the email and intimates to the user that confidential information is being sent out. The administrator can then take appropriate action."

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption pros

Cons

"Sometimes the performance rates are not consistent."

"The tool should be able to recover data from a stolen device."

"They could improve the latency in the platform when entering the portal."

"I rate the support from Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade a six out of ten."

"While the solution works as it should, it is overly expensive."

"The encryption is fast; however, when it comes to generating decryption of the OS disks, it is sometimes very slow, generating a loss of time."

"I would like to bring centralized management to mobile devices."

"You do need to be careful that you don't mess too much with the endpoint, or you might have issues with the work stations."

More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade cons

"If for example, a user forgets the endpoint key, they cannot access their data. We need a support team that is a single point of contact for the IT entity to be trained and to have documentation for troubleshooting and managing the solution."

"The solution presently doesn't let network folder encryption be done on Macintosh."

"More features need to be included in the encryption software."

"It was hard to install and took us about three months."

"Its remote deployment should be improved. Currently, there is no remote deployment for Symantec Endpoint Encryption. You have to install it manually. There are some issues with AD integration and the time taken to reflect a password on the Endpoint Encryption Manager when a new user has changed the password, but they are already working on these issues, and these will be resolved in the next release."

"The program's disk encryption is not very friendly with Microsoft OS updates. We have a problem with updates failing unless we use a time-consuming work-around."

"Its decryption time needs to be improved. Currently, its decryption time is very long, and it takes double time than encryption. They need to work on that. Its encryption time is fine."

"We would like some advanced security protection features."

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As it costs $125 per workstation per year, something which is above the price of what the competition is charging, the solution is definitely too expensive."

"They have two solutions for encryption including Symantec Endpoint Encryption and PGP Endpoint Encryption. With one PGP license, you can deploy the two solutions. The PGP license gives you two options."

"Although the performance and stability of this solution are good, our challenge is the price tag. You buy the solution once, but you also have to keep on buying the licenses yearly."

"It can be expensive. However, if you plan to scale or are at a large enterprise company, this product could be what you need."

"The licensing costs yearly are $5000."

"The pricing is fair but there is variability in our area that needs to be addressed."

"Depending on how many modules you will use (up to five) the licensing will be more expensive."

"We hold an annual license, and their pricing is competitive, falling into the affordable range."

"Considering the fluctuation in exchange rates in our part of the world, we find it generally affordable."

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

26%

Security Firm

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?

It is a cross-platform tool.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?

The cost of licenses depends on the characteristics or implementation you are looking for.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?

See all answers

How does Microsoft BitLocker compare with Symantec Endpoint Encryption?

Microsoft BitLocker is very intuitive and easy to maintain. It is basically the global standard solution for drive encryption and it successfully fulfills regulatory needs in terms of data protecti...

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Endpoint Encryption?

Antivirus, URL filtering, and firewall protection are the most effective features for data protection.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Endpoint Encryption?

I am not sure about the pricing and licensing cost of Symantec Endpoint Encryption.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft BitLocker vs Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

Compared 75% of the time

McAfee Complete Data Protection vs Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

Compared 25% of the time

More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade Competitors

Microsoft BitLocker vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 75% of the time

McAfee Complete Data Protection vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 10% of the time

ESET Endpoint Encryption vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 8% of the time

Stormshield Data Security vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 7% of the time

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

June 2025

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade report

Download Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

May 2025

Download Symantec Endpoint Encryption product report

Also Known As

No data available

Symantec Drive Encryption

Overview

The Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade provides automatic security for all information on endpoint hard drives, including user data, operating system files and temporary and erased files. For maximum data protection, multi-factor pre-boot authentication ensures user identity, while encryption prevents data loss from theft.
Learn more about Full disk encryption.

Check Point Software Technologies

Symantec Drive Encryption, powered by PGP technology provides organizations with strong full-disk and removable media encryption and the ability to integrate with Symantec Data Loss Prevention. Intuitive management enables enterprise scale deployments and features compliance-based, out-of-the-box reporting plus customizable reports. Management capabilities include support for native OS encryption (FileVault2) and Opal compliant self-encrypting drives.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)

Citrix Systems Inc., City of Lansing, Commercial & Industrial Property, France T_l_visions, Fujian Mobile Co. Ltd., Group Lotus plc, Hall Booth Smith & Slover, P.C. (HBSS), Portugal Telecom, PostFinance, Public Pension Agency

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption

June 2025

Free Report: Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption report.

See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.