We performed a comparison between Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade and Microsoft BitLocker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Encryption solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It keeps the devices well monitored."
"It is a cross-platform tool."
"This software has helped individuals in the organization avoid data loss."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is hard disk protection."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Encryption prevents data loss which can cost the organization a lot of resources."
"The encryption ensures each of our drives is not invasive and that the user does not have a bad experience even while the drive is being encrypted."
"Its ability to provide a security layer of encryption that allows us to prevent unauthorized access to computers."
"The manageability of it is a valuable feature."
"Integration with System Center Configuration Manager (C: and D: logical drives are encrypted before installing Windows via SCCM)."
"Whole Disk Encryption is great. BitLocker runs seamlessly during boot up."
"The ease of administering and integrating the solution is great."
"Feature-wise we have the ability to encrypt fast."
"BitLocker is completely stable."
"The product is stable."
"The ease of use is the most valuable feature. The ability to import data to build your frontend on top of the data is very simple and very useable."
"The tool is too expensive to be an add-on to the main solution. They could launch it independently so that costs can be lowered."
"The response time for technical support could be faster."
"They should improve the interface and make it a little more user-friendly."
"The price is high for small scale business enterprises."
"In the future, I would like to see is the ability to decrypt equipment."
"There are a few cases of security breaches when the networking system fails and can lead to malware attacks. The next release should focus more on data virtualization and support for all computing devices."
"Sometimes the performance rates are not consistent."
"Regarding the general topic of support, many have annoyances with it."
"The people at the first level of support refer you to articles that do not pertain to the problem at hand."
"The biggest one for us is revoking access. So, even though someone downloads something to a device, we want the ability to cloak that device or data and bring it back or make that data unusable for that person. Currently, BitLocker doesn't give us that ability. It basically encrypts it. We're seeing if identity management or IAM allows us to do that. We're kind of looking at third-party software that does that for us."
"More customization options would have been nice, such as password selection, actions when the screen is locked, etc."
"I often have to make multiple attempts to log in."
"The primary aspect for improvement lies in expanding our developer base, which would accelerate the development process and bring these enhancements to fruition"
"There are options which could be implemented to make it a little more like PGP Whole Disk Encryption."
"The migration itself is a nightmare."
"The reporting in Microsoft is very minimal."
More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is ranked 4th in Endpoint Encryption with 16 reviews while Microsoft BitLocker is ranked 1st in Endpoint Encryption with 59 reviews. Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is rated 8.6, while Microsoft BitLocker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade writes "Centralized management with full disk encryption and helpful authentification capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft BitLocker writes "User-friendly, easy to set up, and offers real-time machine status updates". Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is most compared with Cisco Secure Endpoint and McAfee Complete Data Protection, whereas Microsoft BitLocker is most compared with ESET Endpoint Encryption, McAfee Complete Data Protection, Symantec Endpoint Encryption, Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption and Cisco Secure Endpoint. See our Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Microsoft BitLocker report.
See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors and best Mobile Data Protection vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
