Sophos SafeGuard vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption comparison

Symantec Endpoint Encryption and Sophos SafeGuard compete in the enterprise encryption and security solutions market. Based on feature integration and innovative security measures, Sophos SafeGuard seems to have an edge.

Features: Symantec Endpoint Encryption excels in providing robust encryption for large-scale deployments with features like seamless data protection across files, folders, mobile, and email. It integrates well with other Symantec products for a comprehensive security approach. Sophos SafeGuard offers strong encryption for hard disks and USB devices and stands out with synchronized security features integrated with Sophos firewall. It includes unique capabilities like Sophos Sandstorm for advanced threat detection.

Room for Improvement: Symantec Endpoint Encryption needs better support integration with non-Symantec products, user-friendly deployment, and enhancements in mobile encryption. Simplifying pricing structures and streamlining upgrades with Windows updates are also necessary. Sophos SafeGuard could improve by offering more lightweight encryption processes, transparent pricing, and expanding features without additional costs. It would benefit from better cloud integration and centralized management tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Endpoint Encryption primarily focuses on on-premises deployments, which may require manual handling, leading to complex experiences. Support experiences vary, with reports of slow response times. Sophos SafeGuard offers flexible deployment options, including hybrid and cloud, and while support quality varies, it tends to be more responsive. In terms of adaptability, especially for cloud environments, Sophos might be a better choice.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec Endpoint Encryption is considered expensive, offering substantial ROI for enterprises seeking robust security, with costs generally bundled with other Symantec products. Sophos SafeGuard has variable pricing with potential for bundling offers, seen as a mid-priced solution. Despite higher costs, the ROI is often justified by its comprehensive integration and security features, offering competitive pricing with versatile options.