We performed a comparison between ESET Endpoint Encryption and Symantec Endpoint Encryption based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Encryption solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The Remote Administrator is the most valuable feature that ESET offers for us. Centralized management of our ESET environment is what I like about the Remote Administrator."
"It is very secure and we have finally decided to use this after a thorough check. The interface is easy to navigate."
"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The product is easy to implement and configure."
"ESET Endpoint Encryption works as an antivirus system."
"The usability is the most valuable feature."
"The setup is getting easier."
"The most valuable feature of ESET Endpoint Encryption is its rate of capturing viruses and malware."
"The encryption feature is very good."
"This product is a solid, all-in-one solution for enterprise data management."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."
"We use it for protecting accounts, which is its most valuable feature."
"The solution is easy to use."
"It helps us put antivirus solutions in place and prevent malware from getting to our machines."
"The management console gives us the ability to quickly control who sees what, ensures we are on the latest version, and up-to-date."
"I like the management aspect of this solution. You don't want to have end-users tweak or set it themselves, so the fact that you could do it from a central point helped us a lot."
"I would like more robust reporting as part of the Remote Administrator."
"The overall compatibility of the device is an area where the solution lacks."
"The initial setup could be made easier."
"There should be more frequent updates."
"ESET Endpoint Encryption needs to improve pricing and security."
"From an admin perspective, the solution's UI could be more user-friendly."
"Integration with central management needs improvement."
"The solution should have better synchronization with active directory users and passwords for use in the encryption."
"The UI could be improved."
"The program's disk encryption is not very friendly with Microsoft OS updates. We have a problem with updates failing unless we use a time-consuming work-around."
"If for example, a user forgets the endpoint key, they cannot access their data. We need a support team that is a single point of contact for the IT entity to be trained and to have documentation for troubleshooting and managing the solution."
"The product can be expensive. Price was a factor in moving away from the product."
"We would like some advanced security protection features."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"They have too high of a price tag. That's why they're losing the market share."
"It's a bit difficult to get good support. Their response times are really bad."
ESET Endpoint Encryption is ranked 6th in Endpoint Encryption with 12 reviews while Symantec Endpoint Encryption is ranked 7th in Endpoint Encryption with 34 reviews. ESET Endpoint Encryption is rated 8.4, while Symantec Endpoint Encryption is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Encryption writes "A reasonably priced solution that is an easy-to-use and effective at the same time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Endpoint Encryption writes "Provides a centralized management console and a straightforward initial setup process ". ESET Endpoint Encryption is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Sophos SafeGuard and WinMagic SecureDoc, whereas Symantec Endpoint Encryption is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, McAfee Complete Data Protection, Cisco Secure Endpoint, Digital Guardian and Sophos SafeGuard. See our ESET Endpoint Encryption vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption report.
See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
