We performed a comparison between Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade and Digital Guardian based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Encryption solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Encryption prevents data loss which can cost the organization a lot of resources."
"Its ability to provide a security layer of encryption that allows us to prevent unauthorized access to computers."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is hard disk protection."
"They have Disc Encryption, Anti-Malware, and a VPN Blade which is beneficial for us."
"End-to-end encryption provides full disk encryption, ensuring that all data on the device, including the operating system."
"This software has helped individuals in the organization avoid data loss."
"This encryption is relatively fast and really covers the needs required."
"It keeps the devices well monitored."
"We have been able to monitor access to files from each of our workstations."
"The feature we call desktop recording is the most valuable aspect of the solution. Not only can we collect data from the user's usage, but we also capture his screenshots when he is trying to steal the data."
"Some of the features that are highly appreciated are its robust data loss prevention capabilities, flexible deployment options, and the ability to monitor data transfer across multiple vectors."
"The technical support is really terrific."
"I like the solution's adaptive inspection and container inspection."
"It has the added advantage of offering forensic analysis."
"In Digital Guardian, they have the cloud correlation servers that give you visibility work like EBR and the correlation server works very well for security analysis."
"It can scale from 100 to 10,000. There's no problem with the scalability."
"They could improve the latency in the platform when entering the portal."
"I rate the support from Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade a six out of ten."
"In the future, I would like to see is the ability to decrypt equipment."
"The price is high for small scale business enterprises."
"The cost of maintaining the system is high for personal use."
"The encryption is fast; however, when it comes to generating decryption of the OS disks, it is sometimes very slow, generating a loss of time."
"There are a few cases of security breaches when the networking system fails and can lead to malware attacks. The next release should focus more on data virtualization and support for all computing devices."
"The tool is too expensive to be an add-on to the main solution. They could launch it independently so that costs can be lowered."
"The solution has complexities around policy creation and deployment."
"Some features on Mac and Linux are not complete currently. For example, some device control features haven't been transferred over to the other systems. If they could have their Windows features also available on Mac and Linux, that would be perfect. Some of our customers have a Mac environment for their RD environment. Having the solution fully capable of handling everything in a Mac environment is crucial."
"When considering potential areas for improvement, it may be beneficial for Digital Guardian to optimize its processes and reduce the computational demands on the system, particularly with regard to high CPU usage. Although Digital Guardian offers numerous benefits, it can consume a substantial amount of RAM and CPU power."
"I would like to see the workflow, to get all the rules and policies set up, be less complicated."
"There are a lot of issues with the current version of the Endpoint agent. It's not stable, it's resource-consuming, and there are some performance issues. If they could improve the stability of the agent it would be great."
"The initial setup is a bit more complex than other solutions."
"It would be helpful if there was an on-premise version of the solution for companies that cannot use the cloud, such as government sectors."
"If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility."
More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is ranked 4th in Endpoint Encryption with 16 reviews while Digital Guardian is ranked 8th in Endpoint Encryption with 11 reviews. Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is rated 8.6, while Digital Guardian is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade writes "Centralized management with full disk encryption and helpful authentification capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Digital Guardian writes "Highly customizable, helpful support, and multiple modules available". Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Cisco Secure Endpoint and McAfee Complete Data Protection, whereas Digital Guardian is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and CrowdStrike Falcon. See our Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Digital Guardian report.
See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors and best Mobile Data Protection vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
