We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard WAF and Venn Software based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The features I have found most valuable are the comprehensive threat prevention capabilities, automated policy management, and seamless integration with cloud environments."
"They offer free trials, which is quite appreciative and grabs more attention from new users and businesses."
"Its main value and what we liked the most is its powerful AI."
"It offers good functionality of the application that is currently running."
"By using a cloud application security solution, our company can save costs by reducing the need for additional security hardware and software and improving operational efficiency."
"After integrating AppSec with other applications, team members can easily work without fear of confidential information exposure."
"It offers high performance and improved productivity for users."
"The app control is very sensitive, and the threat detection and prevention is better than other Check Point solutions. There is a centralized management console for threat protection and self-inspection."
"It allows us to improve our security and prevent company files and data leaks."
"Since the software is launched directly from the computer, not remotely delivered, it has minimized latency and response time."
"We don't need to go to the physical office, and it only requires minimal supervision or assistance from our IT Team."
"The creation of security profiles for each application takes a lot of time."
"It was costlier than other solutions."
"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security needs to improve updates on integrations. It also needs to incorporate real-time monitoring features."
"I advise proactive threat detection intelligence offline, which can also help monitor and ensure system checks and compliances are in place."
"CloudGuard for Application Security, like the other Check Point applications, has been presenting major latency problems when entering their administrative portal."
"There should be automation of threat detection, risk mitigation, and report generation."
"One of the big problems we found in Check Point, in general, is the support."
"A feature we'd like to see in the future is something that could protect against other attack vectors, with a focus on application protection."
"We'd like to see a bit more done with the deployment capabilities."
"Currently, Venn only uses two platforms/applications: Windows and Mac. It would be great if they could also add more platforms since some BYOD employees might be using an application other than Windows or Mac - for example, Linux."
"It would be better to have the back end more efficient."
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is ranked 11th in Application Security Tools with 30 reviews while Venn Software is ranked 28th in Application Security Tools with 3 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is rated 9.0, while Venn Software is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard WAF writes "Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Venn Software writes "Great for hybrid workers, minimizes latency and delivers great performance". Check Point CloudGuard WAF is most compared with SonarQube and Checkmarx One, whereas Venn Software is most compared with Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) and Microsoft Intune. See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Venn Software report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
