Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Venn Software comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Venn Software are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.8, while Venn Software is ranked #58. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 0.1% mindshare in AS, compared to Venn Software’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Venn Software users who would recommend it.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Read 46 Check Point CloudGuard WAF reviews

1,534 Views
276 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Venn Software

Read 3 Venn Software reviews

782 Views
141 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Venn Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Check Point CloudGuard WAF and Venn Software are emerging competitors in the cybersecurity landscape. Venn Software seems to have the upper hand due to its feature-rich capabilities, which outweigh Check Point's competitive pricing and support.

Features: Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers comprehensive threat prevention, robust security measures, and precise attack mitigation. Venn Software provides intuitive setup, advanced analytics, and enhanced control and insights, making it preferred for innovative features.

Room for Improvement: Check Point CloudGuard WAF needs better documentation and integration capabilities, as well as an improved user experience. Venn Software requires enhanced scalability, better reporting tools, and easier management of large deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point CloudGuard WAF deployment is stable but can be complex; however, customer service is responsive. Venn Software is noted for its efficient deployment and excellent customer support, which enhances its appeal.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point CloudGuard WAF's pricing is reasonable, but ROI can vary with deployment scope. Venn Software is pricier but often delivers solid ROI due to its extensive feature set and long-term benefits. Users favor Venn Software for perceived ROI despite higher costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Venn Software Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Venn Software

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Ranking in Application Security Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (11th)

Venn Software

Ranking in Application Security Tools

58th

Average Rating

9.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Access (31st), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (33rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Venn Software is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

Protects our web applications and APIs and has a very low false positive rate

CloudGuard WAF is a very straightforward solution. I do not have to worry about signatures. Most of the solutions that are out there are mainly based on signatures, and I have to do a lot of maintenance to get the signature updates, and sometimes, due to a lack of resources, I am not able to do so. With CloudGuard WAF, I have peace of mind, because most of the features are AI-based, and there is not much configuration that needs to be done on my side. Once set, I only go to CloudGuard WAF to check. I do not have to worry about signatures or updates. Everything is done perfectly, and I have a sense of peace because I know our applications are safe. It is very important for us that CloudGuard WAF protects our applications against threats without relying on signatures. That is definitely one of the key features I need.

Read full review

reviewer2110356

Growth Specialist at Digitrends Soultions

Great for hybrid workers, minimizes latency and delivers great performance

We haven't encountered major issues with the solution. We are really happy that we decided to purchase Venn Software, although they are quite new. The initial setup is seamless. It's not overly complex. In our experience, for the most part, the solution is reliable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches. That said, the performance could be a bit better. We'd like to see a bit more done with the deployment capabilities. The solution needs to offer better local or regional support to cater to offshore users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It helps me sleep at night, providing peace of mind."

"The portal is quite intuitive."

"The tool's most valuable feature is AI, which makes operations easier. Moreover, it is easy to deploy."

"With CloudGuard WAF, I have peace of mind, because most of the features are AI-based, and there is not much configuration that needs to be done on my side."

"Whenever there was a new CVE, Check Point CloudGuard WAF used to block them."

"After integrating AppSec with other applications, team members can easily work without fear of confidential information exposure."

"The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively."

"It provides security for our customers and our products."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pros

"Since the software is launched directly from the computer, not remotely delivered, it has minimized latency and response time."

"We don't need to go to the physical office, and it only requires minimal supervision or assistance from our IT Team."

"It allows us to improve our security and prevent company files and data leaks."

Cons

"The web user interface needs some improvement, even though the functionality is good."

"It was costlier than other solutions."

"I advise proactive threat detection intelligence offline, which can also help monitor and ensure system checks and compliances are in place."

"I do not know if it is already there, but I would like to have complete visibility between the posture management and firewall as a service."

"The learning curve was a challenge due to initially incorrect configurations."

"There are occasions when it interfaces with other systems, leading to a loss of visibility."

"The user interface, SmartConsole, sometimes malfunctions and requires a restart."

"If the price could come down, I would be very happy with the product."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF cons

"It would be better to have the back end more efficient."

"We'd like to see a bit more done with the deployment capabilities."

"Currently, Venn only uses two platforms/applications: Windows and Mac. It would be great if they could also add more platforms since some BYOD employees might be using an application other than Windows or Mac - for example, Linux."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I work for an Indian banking client. In India, companies are on a budget. The company liked Check Point very much, but it was a little bit costly compared to FortiWeb. However, it had more features compared to FortiWeb."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF."

"If the pricing for the Infinity platform covers everything, it would be more straightforward. I had a hard time selling it to our CEO as a former CFO because of the differentials. There are different deltas year to year over a five-year period. It is very difficult to explain. It would be easier to digest for our executives if there was a flatter scale"

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market."

"I find the pricing to be reasonable."

"The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others."

"It is not cheap, but it is worth it."

"The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

University

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?

We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The initial cost of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

There are improvements that can be made regarding pricing since it has a high initial cost. If they could reduce that, it would be beneficial. Additionally, it has a complex initial configuration. ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 18% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 12% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 11% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 11% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF Competitors

Microsoft Intune vs Venn Software

Compared 58% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Venn Software

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs Venn Software

Compared 16% of the time

More Venn Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

August 2025

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF product report

Buyer's Guide

Remote Access

August 2025

Download Venn Software product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec

No data available

Overview

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced security for web applications and APIs with features such as intrusion prevention, bot prevention, and AI-driven threat detection, ensuring organizations achieve high-level protection and efficient security management.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF integrates with APIs, providing a seamless security enhancement while reducing false positives. Its scalability supports rapid deployment, valuable for companies aiming to secure resources in clouds like AWS and Azure. Enhanced threat prevention, comprehensive compliance support, and advanced threat protection methods such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting prevention are key strengths. Despite its robust capabilities, there are opportunities for improvement, such as lower costs, improved third-party tool integration, and a more intuitive interface to enhance usability.

What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Intrusion Prevention System: Effectively detects and blocks unauthorized access attempts.
Bot Prevention: Shields applications from malicious bot traffic.
AI-driven Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify and mitigate threats.
Log Management: Offers extensive logging capabilities for tracking and analysis.
Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across different environments, including multi-cloud.

What benefits should users expect from Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Security Efficiency: Combines high-grade protection with ease of use to simplify security management.
Cost Efficiency: Aids in effective resource utilization, minimizing overhead.
Compliance Support: Helps meet various industry standards effortlessly.
Enhanced Threat Protection: Provides robust safeguards against common web vulnerabilities.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is predominantly applied within industries requiring stringent security standards, such as financial services, healthcare, and e-commerce. Its deployment strengthens the defense of critical APIs, facilitates compliance, and supports efficient multi-cloud security management, aligning well with evolving industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

Venn Software is a powerful platform lauded for its robust features, intuitive UI, and responsive customer support. Users appreciate its scalability, customization options, and seamless integration capabilities. However, a few reviews mention occasional performance issues and a steep learning curve, making it challenging for beginners. Based on user reviews, Venn Software provides a reliable solution for businesses seeking advanced functionality, but newcomers may require additional time and support to fully utilize its potential.

Venn Software

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Venn is currently being used by 700+ organizations. The newest version of our secure workspace is selling not only to our existing customer base but to new companies like Voya, ModSquad, TTech and many others.

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Venn Software

July 2025

Free Report: Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Venn Software

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Venn Software and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Venn Software report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.