We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The two most valuable features for us are the central firewall administrator and the real-time cloud compliance monitoring."
"The most valuable features of CloudGuard CNAPP are its compliance engine and auto-remediation features."
"Cloud security posture management is the feature we've been using the longest."
"This platform has allowed us to collect data from multiple sources, centralizing everything under a single source."
"It provides critical insights that enable the IT team to plan and launch smart investigations when there are security breaches."
"We really liked its ease of implementation against our Microsoft Azure environment."
"It has great scalability."
"It learns from behavior, attacks, management, detections, captures packets, real-time analysis, et cetera. It's generating knowledge from a variety of sources for an excellent analysis."
"The product’s most valuable features are compliance, recommendations, and inventories."
"The solution is up-to-date and helps prevent zero-day attacks."
"The solution helps identify threats and vulnerabilities."
"One valuable feature is the Microsoft Security Scorecard."
"The product's stability is very high...The scalability of the product is amazing."
"The technical support could be better, but I do not know of any other needed improvements."
"Addressing the large amount of compliance information and benchmarks we need to observe, the tools are becoming our goto dashboards."
"I am not a technical person, but generically, the user interface can be a little more intuitive. Our staff has trained network security and cloud security professionals, and they get it, but when you are trying to get to the customers to be able to pick it up and maintain it, it can be a bit difficult."
"I would like them to include support for their products in languages other than English."
"The accuracy of its remediation is a 7.5 out of 10. Before, I would have given it a ten but now, to handle remediation for fully qualified domain names, it's not working as it did in the past. We're finding some difficulties there."
"I would like an interface more adapted to cell phones or tablets."
"The license cost is expensive and has room for improvement."
"We're looking for a solution that can incorporate legacy infrastructure for some of our business needs."
"The technical support takes too much time to resolve tickets."
"The general support could be improved."
"The setup phase of the product is not that easy and needs a person to have a certain level of expertise."
"It is challenging to extract and customize reports from the system."
"Integration can be improved."
More Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Vulnerability Management with 63 reviews while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is ranked 23rd in Vulnerability Management with 5 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management writes "The vulnerability assessment is very accurate because it runs directly into the vulnerability database". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Microsoft Sentinel. See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
