Centreon vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Centreon and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.7, while SolarWinds is ranked #95. Centreon holds a 1.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

9,361 Views
7,395 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Network Automati...

Read 2 SolarWinds Network Automation Manager reviews

2,421 Views
1,670 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Centreon

SolarWinds Network Automati...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Centreon and SolarWinds Network Automation Manager are competing products in the network management arena. SolarWinds often appears more robust due to its comprehensive toolset, potentially justifying a higher price point despite Centreon's advantages in support and cost satisfaction.

Features:Centreon emphasizes seamless infrastructure monitoring, advanced dashboards, and open APIs for integration. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager shines with extensive network discovery, configuration management, and automation capabilities. While both offer strong monitoring tools, SolarWinds' focus on automation and network management gives it a distinctive edge.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Centreon offers a straightforward deployment model with a community-driven approach and efficient support mechanisms. Meanwhile, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager provides a more complex deployment process, supported by extensive documentation and responsive customer service. Centreon users find implementation faster, while SolarWinds benefits from a more detailed support infrastructure.

Pricing and ROI:Centreon is recognized for its cost-effective setup and potential for high ROI, especially attractive for businesses focusing on cost efficiency. In contrast, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager involves a higher initial investment but offers compelling long-term ROI through its expansive feature set and operational efficiencies. While Centreon's pricing appeals due to lower initial costs, SolarWinds may justify its pricing through greater functionality and comprehensive solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

23rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (26th), Cloud Monitoring Software (20th)

SolarWinds Network Automati...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

95th

Average Rating

5.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Automation (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.2%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.2%
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager	0.4%
Other	98.4%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

Giulio Valeri

Owner at SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SRL

Threat detection failures, poor technical support, and expensive

We use the solution to manage all of our customer's systems. We monitor and decide if everything is okay and if not, we do changes when needed. For example, if there is a need to change the antivirus software we can automate the process and install the new one. There are scripts within the software…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that most of its plug-ins are free."

"For servers and for applications, it was very, very efficient."

"Centreon is a solution, and it is very good and efficient if you put all your infrastructure inside."

"It provides visibility into the network."

"This product provides comprehensive reporting for our top management."

"The most important feature is that it permits us to receive alarms if there is an incident within the infrastructure. The feature I love the most is the reporting feature, the MBI (Monitoring Business Intelligence) which permits us to send advanced reports to our customers in PDF format or in Doc format. We also deploy Centreon Map which gives our customers intuitive views of their information system."

"Centreon is a really capable tool that increases efficiency and gives you more information."

"We have everything we need with the product."

More Centreon pros

"The solution offers so many great resources, it makes them a powerhouse in the market."

"We are satisfied with the stability of the solution."

"The installation is easy."

Cons

"They only sell four hour slots for support, so if you have just one question, then you need to pay for four hours."

"The problem with the reporting is you have to configure the report, and after that, you will have the same report every month, every week, every day. You have to sync it in order to have a great report."

"The pricing setup costs and licensing weren't very good in the past."

"There are improvements that they need to make to their API. When we're using different systems and we want to disable monitoring for a specific server, we still can't do that through the API. That's something that's lacking."

"During the initial setup we faced some issues. Part of it was because we had to become more knowledgeable in the solution. There are some gray areas and if you don't know the product well you may have issues. Another part of it was some bugs that we came across, although that's part of every software solution in IT nowadays. But the initial setup could be easier."

"The most important issue is the capability to interconnect with other systems."

"Centreon introduced network discovery in the most recent update. However, it doesn't work well. Our previous monitoring tool could discover networking equipment on the network and identify the relationships between the devices."

"Centreon supports officially 10,000 services per poller. That is not much for larger customers, because this limit is reached very quickly. We use it with three times the limit without any problems, but Centreon says, "Okay, we are only supporting it with 10,000 services." We are aware that increasing the limit has different impacts because they need to support it. However, for most customers, it would be be very good if they could increase the limit of services."

More Centreon cons

"We now use ConnectWise because while using SolarWinds we were attacked by ransomware. The solution did not protect us."

"We did not like SolarWinds because it was not able to communicate between UPSA and our accounting system. They should have better integration."

"The price could be a bit lower."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They only sell four hour slots for support, so if you have just one question, then you need to pay for four hours. Or, you need to wait until you have enough questions to fill those four hours. They are not flexible in this."

"It's quite expensive when you use the Enterprise version, but if you compare it to other providers, it's more like a middle-of-the-line product. It's always good to have a price that is lower, but I would say the price is okay because we get very good support and if we have any other issues we can always contact them. There has never been a time when I didn't get help from them."

"Centreon is an open source product. Thus, there is no need for licensing."

"The solution has a free part and after that threshold, you will need to pay. For example, if you believe you can create an interesting map, most of the time, you will have to pay 10,000 Euros per year for having access to these components."

"For more complex tasks, we use prepaid support days and ask Centreon to come onsite."

"In terms of licensing, you have to think through if the components that need licensing are really needed. For example, the Map module: If you don't need a map to be shown, I don't see a point in paying for those licenses, if you just use it a couple of times a month or a couple of times a week... You can use the Centreon free version and get the main features. The licensing part is, I would say, only for bigger customers who have the option to pay more and who really need those kinds of modules, fancy reports, etc."

"If you need basic monitoring without dashboards, just monitoring, the plugins are very useful and really cheap. If you want a more complete solution with dashboards and reporting, the EMS solution is great and it is not that much more expensive. It's a good value. Really good."

"The tool is cheaply priced."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

"The price of SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is fair. However, it is more expensive than ConnectWise."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

12%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

NetBrain vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 17% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 9% of the time

SCOM vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

October 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Automation

September 2026

SolarWinds Network Automation Manager report

Download SolarWinds Network Automation Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

SolarWinds NAM

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is a comprehensive tool designed to streamline network management and automation, helping IT teams enhance efficiency and reliability in network operations.

SolarWinds Network Automation Manager offers a detailed interface for overseeing network assets, vastly improving operational efficiency. It ensures seamless integration with existing infrastructure and automates routine tasks, reducing manual errors and increasing administrative control. This tool provides network administrators with a robust platform to manage configurations, performance metrics, and security protocols, enabling them to focus on strategic tasks.

What are the key features of SolarWinds Network Automation Manager?

Configuration Management: Automates tracking and installation of network device configurations, simplifying updates and audits.
Network Performance Monitoring: Offers real-time visibility into network health, ensuring operational continuity.
IP Address Management: Efficiently handles IP address provisioning and documentation to prevent conflicts.
Network Traffic Analysis: Provides insights into bandwidth usage and traffic patterns for better resource management.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased Productivity: Frees IT staff from repetitive tasks, allowing focus on strategic initiatives.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes downtime and maintenance costs through efficient issue detection and troubleshooting.
Improved Security: Enhances network safety with automated compliance checks and vulnerability management.
Scalability: Supports growth with flexible architecture to accommodate expanding network requirements.

Industries including finance, healthcare, and education utilize SolarWinds Network Automation Manager to meet specific needs like regulatory compliance, operational continuity, and cost efficiency. By automating complex processes, organizations can maintain high-performance networks, adapt quickly to industry challenges, and optimize resource allocation.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

Maalem Financing Company, School City of Hammond

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

September 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.