Centreon vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager comparison

Centreon and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.3, while SolarWinds is ranked #92. Centreon holds a 1.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

8,080 Views
6,545 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Network Automati...

Read 2 SolarWinds Network Automation Manager reviews

1,968 Views
1,299 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Centreon

SolarWinds Network Automati...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Centreon and SolarWinds Network Automation Manager are competing products in the network management arena. SolarWinds often appears more robust due to its comprehensive toolset, potentially justifying a higher price point despite Centreon's advantages in support and cost satisfaction.

Features:Centreon emphasizes seamless infrastructure monitoring, advanced dashboards, and open APIs for integration. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager shines with extensive network discovery, configuration management, and automation capabilities. While both offer strong monitoring tools, SolarWinds' focus on automation and network management gives it a distinctive edge.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Centreon offers a straightforward deployment model with a community-driven approach and efficient support mechanisms. Meanwhile, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager provides a more complex deployment process, supported by extensive documentation and responsive customer service. Centreon users find implementation faster, while SolarWinds benefits from a more detailed support infrastructure.

Pricing and ROI:Centreon is recognized for its cost-effective setup and potential for high ROI, especially attractive for businesses focusing on cost efficiency. In contrast, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager involves a higher initial investment but offers compelling long-term ROI through its expansive feature set and operational efficiencies. While Centreon's pricing appeals due to lower initial costs, SolarWinds may justify its pricing through greater functionality and comprehensive solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

27th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (27th), Cloud Monitoring Software (20th)

SolarWinds Network Automati...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

92nd

Average Rating

5.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Automation (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.3%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.3%
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager	0.4%
Other	98.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

Giulio Valeri

Owner at SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SRL

Threat detection failures, poor technical support, and expensive

We use the solution to manage all of our customer's systems. We monitor and decide if everything is okay and if not, we do changes when needed. For example, if there is a need to change the antivirus software we can automate the process and install the new one. There are scripts within the software…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is available in ISO image format, ready for deployment. Centreon also has a comprehensive guide and documentation that are simple and easy to follow."

"We are alerted on service impacts and not when something is down. We have saved a lot of time on non-business-hours intervention."

"The single-pane view provides us a view of all of our network infrastructure, and it is one of the most important tools that we use to see the status of our customers' networks."

"We have a single GUI where we can view the status of all our infrastructure."

"Centreon is a solution, and it is very good and efficient if you put all your infrastructure inside."

"Centreon's real-time monitoring, despite having some manual aspects, supports us in managing our operations effectively."

"We and our customers have saved so much time that we are acting instead of reacting to a situation in a positive way."

"Centreon's most valuable feature is Opsgenie."

More Centreon pros

"The solution offers so many great resources, it makes them a powerhouse in the market."

"We are satisfied with the stability of the solution."

"The installation is easy."

Cons

"Now that we got it, I haven't had time to work on it since it is a paid solution that is quite expensive."

"Release management and quality of testing need improvement, because with each major upgrade we have many issues coming in. Then, it takes several minor upgrades to get rid of them."

"Improvements I would like to see include a discovery solution, better reports, and end-to-end monitoring."

"The Home view could be improved by adding customization functions that allow users to change the size of the widgets for a more uniform layout."

"Centreon needs to improve the granularity of the data as well as the graphical data. It would also be better to if there was improvement to the filtering/grouping system as well as the creation of views."

"The problem with the reporting is you have to configure the report, and after that, you will have the same report every month, every week, every day. You have to sync it in order to have a great report."

"There are improvements that they need to make to their API. When we're using different systems and we want to disable monitoring for a specific server, we still can't do that through the API. That's something that's lacking."

"Centreon introduced network discovery in the most recent update. However, it doesn't work well. Our previous monitoring tool could discover networking equipment on the network and identify the relationships between the devices."

More Centreon cons

"We now use ConnectWise because while using SolarWinds we were attacked by ransomware. The solution did not protect us."

"We did not like SolarWinds because it was not able to communicate between UPSA and our accounting system. They should have better integration."

"The price could be a bit lower."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution has a free part and after that threshold, you will need to pay. For example, if you believe you can create an interesting map, most of the time, you will have to pay 10,000 Euros per year for having access to these components."

"Open-source solutions like this can be very cost effective for an organization looking for a product that they can quickly implement, as there is no initial cost and there are no license renewal fees. However, it is important to take into consideration some of the related costs that may come along as needed, such as training, support, and product enhancements."

"Their licensing model is really easy. You have one license and you have access to all the features, compared to other tools where you have to purchase add-ons."

"Centreon is always available to develop new plugins when needed. The most important thing is that their maintenance account yearly subscription fee includes the fact that they will maintain the new plugins that you requested them to deliver."

"I would like to see improvement in the licensing model. You can purchase X number of licenses, up to 1,000 devices or 1,000 instances. Your next batch is 2,000. But what if you only need, say, 1,200? The model could be changed a little bit."

"In terms of licensing, you have to think through if the components that need licensing are really needed. For example, the Map module: If you don't need a map to be shown, I don't see a point in paying for those licenses, if you just use it a couple of times a month or a couple of times a week... You can use the Centreon free version and get the main features. The licensing part is, I would say, only for bigger customers who have the option to pay more and who really need those kinds of modules, fancy reports, etc."

"You purchase a package. You have a support contract (there is also a platinum support contract) and it is per module. That means you have to pay, e.g., for the MBI module or the BAM module. Or, if you want to save a lot of money, you can pay for IMP, which is the complete package."

"It is perfect and very cheap if you are a little company or startup. After that, it is quite expensive for a big company."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

"The price of SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is fair. However, it is more expensive than ConnectWise."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 10% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

NetBrain vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 21% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 9% of the time

SCOM vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 6% of the time

More SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

June 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Automation

June 2026

SolarWinds Network Automation Manager report

Download SolarWinds Network Automation Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

SolarWinds NAM

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is a comprehensive tool designed to streamline network management and automation, helping IT teams enhance efficiency and reliability in network operations.

SolarWinds Network Automation Manager offers a detailed interface for overseeing network assets, vastly improving operational efficiency. It ensures seamless integration with existing infrastructure and automates routine tasks, reducing manual errors and increasing administrative control. This tool provides network administrators with a robust platform to manage configurations, performance metrics, and security protocols, enabling them to focus on strategic tasks.

What are the key features of SolarWinds Network Automation Manager?

Configuration Management: Automates tracking and installation of network device configurations, simplifying updates and audits.
Network Performance Monitoring: Offers real-time visibility into network health, ensuring operational continuity.
IP Address Management: Efficiently handles IP address provisioning and documentation to prevent conflicts.
Network Traffic Analysis: Provides insights into bandwidth usage and traffic patterns for better resource management.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased Productivity: Frees IT staff from repetitive tasks, allowing focus on strategic initiatives.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes downtime and maintenance costs through efficient issue detection and troubleshooting.
Improved Security: Enhances network safety with automated compliance checks and vulnerability management.
Scalability: Supports growth with flexible architecture to accommodate expanding network requirements.

Industries including finance, healthcare, and education utilize SolarWinds Network Automation Manager to meet specific needs like regulatory compliance, operational continuity, and cost efficiency. By automating complex processes, organizations can maintain high-performance networks, adapt quickly to industry challenges, and optimize resource allocation.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

Maalem Financing Company, School City of Hammond

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

June 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.