Centreon vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor comparison

Centreon and Power Admin are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Centreon is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.3, while Power Admin is ranked #74. Centreon holds a 1.7% mindshare in IM, compared to Power Admin’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Power Admin users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

8,080 Views
5,898 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Read 2 Power Admin PA Server Monitor reviews

1,450 Views
1,131 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Centreon

Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Power Admin PA Server Monitor and Centreon compete in the network and server monitoring category. Centreon seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set and adaptability to complex IT environments, outweighing the favorable cost and support of Power Admin PA Server Monitor.

Features: Power Admin PA Server Monitor focuses on simplicity and ease of use, offering basic server and network monitoring capabilities. It highlights core functions that are easy for users to configure. Centreon provides advanced integrations and comprehensive monitoring, making it suitable for IT professionals looking for flexibility. It offers an adaptable approach to diverse setups with a robust feature package.

Room for Improvement: Power Admin PA Server Monitor could enhance its offering by expanding beyond basic monitoring features and improving its integration capabilities. Its adaptability to complex infrastructures is another area to consider. Centreon might benefit from simplifying its deployment process. Enhancing out-of-the-box ease of use, refining its user interface, and expanding support for non-standard setups could be valuable.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Power Admin PA Server Monitor is noted for fast deployments within traditional IT infrastructures, supported by responsive customer service. Centreon, while requiring significant setup time, offers extensive documentation and support channels. It suits organizations with dedicated resources for deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Power Admin PA Server Monitor is seen as cost-effective, ideal for small businesses with limited budgets due to its lower setup costs. Its ROI is considered satisfactory with minimal initial investment. Centreon is more expensive upfront but promises substantial long-term ROI through its scalability and extensive features, making it appealing for larger enterprises seeking comprehensive solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

27th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (27th), Cloud Monitoring Software (20th)

Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

74th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.7%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Power Admin PA Server Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.7%
Power Admin PA Server Monitor	0.5%
Other	97.8%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

it_user225771

IT Network Engineer at a engineering company with 51-200 employees

The setup is straightforward, but the satellite service installation file could be separated from the server one.

* The status overview page provides a state of computers monitored and provides quickly what users need to focus on * The satellite service installed on remote computers is an easy way to add clients, plus it's easy to deploy and to configure * The licence is perpetual and not linked to one computer, so it's possible to remove a licence from one computer and use it on another with no extra cost

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I can't point to one valuable feature. All of Centreon is good."

"Centreon's real-time monitoring, despite having some manual aspects, supports us in managing our operations effectively."

"It provides visibility into the network."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to build an abstraction of service visualization. You can add services to an entity called Business Activities and you can see the state of these activities."

"If they have the same issues that we had, which means a lot of pollers spread across the whole infrastructure and no central view to look at the entire status with the need to manage everything together, then it is a good solution."

"Centreon provides timesaving and costsaving benefits as it lets us manage multiple devices on a single platform."

"The downtimes feature is helpful. If the ISP is doing some maintenance on its network, we have the option to put downtime on the devices or the services, so we won't get any false alarms."

"I really like the filtering capabilities of it. You can easily tell what's critical next to what's okay, the state of the services. It's very easy to get the whole picture quickly."

More Centreon pros

"The possibility to develop your own VB scripts."

"The satellite service installed on remote computers is an easy way to add clients, plus it's easy to deploy and to configure the licence is perpetual and not linked to one computer, so it's possible to remove a licence from one computer and use it on another with no extra cost"

Cons

"The problem with the reporting is you have to configure the report, and after that, you will have the same report every month, every week, every day. You have to sync it in order to have a great report."

"The pricing setup costs and licensing weren't very good in the past."

"There is room for improvement in the area of artificial intelligence. The product gives us a lot of information, but it's only information. We want the product to do more auto-remediation."

"Where Centreon is weaker is that the initial deployment could be easier."

"Release management and quality of testing need improvement, because with each major upgrade we have many issues coming in. Then, it takes several minor upgrades to get rid of them."

"The Home view could be improved by adding customization functions that allow users to change the size of the widgets for a more uniform layout."

"It is necessary to improve service monitoring of database services in the free version."

"The product collects the information, but it fails to send them via SMS, WhatsApp or Telegram."

More Centreon cons

"The satellite service installation file could be separated from the server one. It would reduce the size of the file, and reduce the time to deploy on weak connections."

"Basic monitoring on Unix was working really well but it didn't really help under machines in Windows Domain Controller."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You purchase a package. You have a support contract (there is also a platinum support contract) and it is per module. That means you have to pay, e.g., for the MBI module or the BAM module. Or, if you want to save a lot of money, you can pay for IMP, which is the complete package."

"The solution has a free part and after that threshold, you will need to pay. For example, if you believe you can create an interesting map, most of the time, you will have to pay 10,000 Euros per year for having access to these components."

"The price is not too high. Licensing is driven by how many hosts you monitor, but because you can run the agentless version, you don't have to declare every host to Centreon, one at a time. That means you can drive your infrastructure supervision with a very low number of declared hosts."

"If you need basic monitoring without dashboards, just monitoring, the plugins are very useful and really cheap. If you want a more complete solution with dashboards and reporting, the EMS solution is great and it is not that much more expensive. It's a good value. Really good."

"The pricing is acceptable."

"Centreon is better than Nagios XI in regards to cost and support response times, when you have a problem. If you have a problem, it costs money to contact the Nagios XI support."

"I would like to see improvement in the licensing model. You can purchase X number of licenses, up to 1,000 devices or 1,000 instances. Your next batch is 2,000. But what if you only need, say, 1,200? The model could be changed a little bit."

"Their licensing model is really easy. You have one license and you have access to all the features, compared to other tools where you have to purchase add-ons."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 10% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

Zabbix vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 15% of the time

Nagios XI vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Lenovo XClarity Controller vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

More Power Admin PA Server Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

June 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

June 2026

Download Power Admin PA Server Monitor product report

Also Known As

No data available

PA Server Monitor

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

Power Admin PA Server Monitor offers a comprehensive approach to server and network monitoring, aimed at enhancing IT efficiency. Its features provide robust monitoring capabilities tailored for system administrators seeking to maintain and optimize server performance.

Power Admin PA Server Monitor is designed to streamline server management by providing detailed insights into system operations. It delivers functionalities that simplify the monitoring process, allowing IT professionals to identify and resolve issues efficiently. Its real-time alerting ensures timely reactions to potential issues, while reporting tools offer valuable data analysis, aiding in decision-making processes.

What are the key features?

Real-Time Alerts: Immediate notifications help prevent potential downtime.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed logs for performance monitoring and planning.
Remote Access: Manage servers from any location, increasing flexibility.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views to track critical metrics.
Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to growing requirements.

What benefits should users consider?

Efficiency: Streamlined operations save time and reduce manual tasks.
Cost Savings: Early detection of issues minimizes repair costs.
Reliability: Enhanced system stability increases uptime and trust.
Flexibility: Adaptable features cater to specific monitoring needs.

Power Admin PA Server Monitor is utilized across diverse industries, from healthcare to finance, where reliable server performance is crucial. Its customizable features support sector-specific requirements, ensuring seamless integration into existing IT infrastructures and delivering consistent performance monitoring tailored to industry demands.

Power Admin

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

Sauder Woodworking, Symantec, Microsoft, Skull Candy, NASA, Xerox, Chevron

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor

June 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.