Centreon vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor comparison

Centreon and Power Admin are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Centreon is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.3, while Power Admin is ranked #74. Centreon holds a 1.7% mindshare in IM, compared to Power Admin’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Power Admin users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

8,080 Views
5,898 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Read 2 Power Admin PA Server Monitor reviews

1,450 Views
1,131 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Centreon

Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Power Admin PA Server Monitor and Centreon compete in the network and server monitoring category. Centreon seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set and adaptability to complex IT environments, outweighing the favorable cost and support of Power Admin PA Server Monitor.

Features: Power Admin PA Server Monitor focuses on simplicity and ease of use, offering basic server and network monitoring capabilities. It highlights core functions that are easy for users to configure. Centreon provides advanced integrations and comprehensive monitoring, making it suitable for IT professionals looking for flexibility. It offers an adaptable approach to diverse setups with a robust feature package.

Room for Improvement: Power Admin PA Server Monitor could enhance its offering by expanding beyond basic monitoring features and improving its integration capabilities. Its adaptability to complex infrastructures is another area to consider. Centreon might benefit from simplifying its deployment process. Enhancing out-of-the-box ease of use, refining its user interface, and expanding support for non-standard setups could be valuable.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Power Admin PA Server Monitor is noted for fast deployments within traditional IT infrastructures, supported by responsive customer service. Centreon, while requiring significant setup time, offers extensive documentation and support channels. It suits organizations with dedicated resources for deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Power Admin PA Server Monitor is seen as cost-effective, ideal for small businesses with limited budgets due to its lower setup costs. Its ROI is considered satisfactory with minimal initial investment. Centreon is more expensive upfront but promises substantial long-term ROI through its scalability and extensive features, making it appealing for larger enterprises seeking comprehensive solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

27th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (27th), Cloud Monitoring Software (20th)

Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

74th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.7%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Power Admin PA Server Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.7%
Power Admin PA Server Monitor	0.5%
Other	97.8%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

it_user225771

IT Network Engineer at a engineering company with 51-200 employees

The setup is straightforward, but the satellite service installation file could be separated from the server one.

* The status overview page provides a state of computers monitored and provides quickly what users need to focus on * The satellite service installed on remote computers is an easy way to add clients, plus it's easy to deploy and to configure * The licence is perpetual and not linked to one computer, so it's possible to remove a licence from one computer and use it on another with no extra cost

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The downtimes feature is helpful. If the ISP is doing some maintenance on its network, we have the option to put downtime on the devices or the services, so we won't get any false alarms."

"My advice would be to go ahead with Centreon; don't waste time, go ahead."

"We use the remote server functionality on some customer sites, because you can see an independent view and are not dependent on a single connection. If you have branch offices or bigger office outside your headquarters, you can use remote servers because if the connection is broken or disrupted, then remote server will obtain a view of your environment and server availability. This is a good point against using other solutions. Because with other solutions, you don't have this feature. Then, you will be blind if you have this type of a situation."

"We picked Centreon because, after an open-source comparison, and given what we want to do, and our skills and experience as well, it was the best solution for us, the most reliable for our services."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that most of its plug-ins are free."

"Centreon helps me detect where the problem is quickly. When we resolve a problem quickly, this lowers our overall costs."

"What I like most about Centreon is that it is very flexible and customizable, based on the user and/or business needs. Centreon is very flexible when it comes to monitoring parameters. We can use scripts found on the internet or scripts created by our infra/apps team. Also, the data visualization features are very simple and straightforward, yet very informative."

"Valuable features include the ability to schedule downtime, intensity or depth of monitoring which it does, different plugin packs, Centreon MAP, Centreon BI."

More Centreon pros

"The possibility to develop your own VB scripts."

"The satellite service installed on remote computers is an easy way to add clients, plus it's easy to deploy and to configure the licence is perpetual and not linked to one computer, so it's possible to remove a licence from one computer and use it on another with no extra cost"

Cons

"The product collects the information, but it fails to send them via SMS, WhatsApp or Telegram."

"Release management and quality of testing need improvement, because with each major upgrade we have many issues coming in. Then, it takes several minor upgrades to get rid of them."

"I would like to see a better UI, one which is more responsive."

"Improvements I would like to see include a discovery solution, better reports, and end-to-end monitoring."

"To get it started is a lot of work, since it comes empty. We had to push information into it to make it work."

"Centreon supports officially 10,000 services per poller. That is not much for larger customers, because this limit is reached very quickly. We use it with three times the limit without any problems, but Centreon says, "Okay, we are only supporting it with 10,000 services." We are aware that increasing the limit has different impacts because they need to support it. However, for most customers, it would be be very good if they could increase the limit of services."

"This solution lacks service monitoring in the cloud."

"Where Centreon is weaker is that the initial deployment could be easier."

More Centreon cons

"Basic monitoring on Unix was working really well but it didn't really help under machines in Windows Domain Controller."

"The satellite service installation file could be separated from the server one. It would reduce the size of the file, and reduce the time to deploy on weak connections."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is very effective, despite the low price."

"If you need basic monitoring without dashboards, just monitoring, the plugins are very useful and really cheap. If you want a more complete solution with dashboards and reporting, the EMS solution is great and it is not that much more expensive. It's a good value. Really good."

"The pricing is acceptable."

"Centreon is an open source product. Thus, there is no need for licensing."

"I think Centreon's pricing is fair, especially given the criticality of our system. They were cheaper than the other solutions. The licensing terms were pretty straightforward. I believe it was based on the number of hosts."

"Centreon is always available to develop new plugins when needed. The most important thing is that their maintenance account yearly subscription fee includes the fact that they will maintain the new plugins that you requested them to deliver."

"The price is not too high. Licensing is driven by how many hosts you monitor, but because you can run the agentless version, you don't have to declare every host to Centreon, one at a time. That means you can drive your infrastructure supervision with a very low number of declared hosts."

"The pricing works out well for us, given our environment and where we are."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 10% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

Zabbix vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 15% of the time

Nagios XI vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Lenovo XClarity Controller vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

More Power Admin PA Server Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

June 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

June 2026

Download Power Admin PA Server Monitor product report

Also Known As

No data available

PA Server Monitor

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

Power Admin PA Server Monitor offers a comprehensive approach to server and network monitoring, aimed at enhancing IT efficiency. Its features provide robust monitoring capabilities tailored for system administrators seeking to maintain and optimize server performance.

Power Admin PA Server Monitor is designed to streamline server management by providing detailed insights into system operations. It delivers functionalities that simplify the monitoring process, allowing IT professionals to identify and resolve issues efficiently. Its real-time alerting ensures timely reactions to potential issues, while reporting tools offer valuable data analysis, aiding in decision-making processes.

What are the key features?

Real-Time Alerts: Immediate notifications help prevent potential downtime.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed logs for performance monitoring and planning.
Remote Access: Manage servers from any location, increasing flexibility.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views to track critical metrics.
Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to growing requirements.

What benefits should users consider?

Efficiency: Streamlined operations save time and reduce manual tasks.
Cost Savings: Early detection of issues minimizes repair costs.
Reliability: Enhanced system stability increases uptime and trust.
Flexibility: Adaptable features cater to specific monitoring needs.

Power Admin PA Server Monitor is utilized across diverse industries, from healthcare to finance, where reliable server performance is crucial. Its customizable features support sector-specific requirements, ensuring seamless integration into existing IT infrastructures and delivering consistent performance monitoring tailored to industry demands.

Power Admin

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

Sauder Woodworking, Symantec, Microsoft, Skull Candy, NASA, Xerox, Chevron

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor

June 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.