Centreon vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Centreon and Power Admin are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Centreon is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.7, while Power Admin is ranked #49 with an average rating of 9.0. Centreon holds a 1.5% mindshare in IM, compared to Power Admin’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Power Admin users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

9,361 Views
6,646 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Read 3 Power Admin PA Server Monitor reviews

1,981 Views
1,565 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Centreon

Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Power Admin PA Server Monitor and Centreon compete in the network and server monitoring category. Centreon seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set and adaptability to complex IT environments, outweighing the favorable cost and support of Power Admin PA Server Monitor.

Features: Power Admin PA Server Monitor focuses on simplicity and ease of use, offering basic server and network monitoring capabilities. It highlights core functions that are easy for users to configure. Centreon provides advanced integrations and comprehensive monitoring, making it suitable for IT professionals looking for flexibility. It offers an adaptable approach to diverse setups with a robust feature package.

Room for Improvement: Power Admin PA Server Monitor could enhance its offering by expanding beyond basic monitoring features and improving its integration capabilities. Its adaptability to complex infrastructures is another area to consider. Centreon might benefit from simplifying its deployment process. Enhancing out-of-the-box ease of use, refining its user interface, and expanding support for non-standard setups could be valuable.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Power Admin PA Server Monitor is noted for fast deployments within traditional IT infrastructures, supported by responsive customer service. Centreon, while requiring significant setup time, offers extensive documentation and support channels. It suits organizations with dedicated resources for deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Power Admin PA Server Monitor is seen as cost-effective, ideal for small businesses with limited budgets due to its lower setup costs. Its ROI is considered satisfactory with minimal initial investment. Centreon is more expensive upfront but promises substantial long-term ROI through its scalability and extensive features, making it appealing for larger enterprises seeking comprehensive solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

26th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (23rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (20th)

Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

49th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

2.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.5%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Power Admin PA Server Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.5%
Power Admin PA Server Monitor	0.5%
Other	98.0%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

reviewer2897232

Deputy Manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Monitoring has become streamlined and now supports complex enterprise workloads across all clouds

My advice to others looking into using Power Admin PA Server Monitor is that they should examine it carefully as it is a very good product. It has many parameters that you can configure and it is very efficient in power savings. I gave this product a rating of 9.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Centreon helps me detect where the problem is quickly. When we resolve a problem quickly, this lowers our overall costs."

"If they have the same issues that we had, which means a lot of pollers spread across the whole infrastructure and no central view to look at the entire status with the need to manage everything together, then it is a good solution."

"We picked Centreon because, after an open-source comparison, and given what we want to do, and our skills and experience as well, it was the best solution for us, the most reliable for our services."

"It is decentralized, which is better, because you can reduce the load from a single system. Also, you get a better view because it's more independent. Then, for the management, it's nice because they have one central system. With that, they can manage all the other systems, as well. This means they don't have to configure each system by system. They can configure it from one single interface."

"Centreon's most valuable features are preventative maintenance and cost-efficiency. Everything is monitored, and we get a log before the system fails. We have an opportunity to fix the issue and avoid downtime."

"We have a single GUI where we can view the status of all our infrastructure."

"You can concentrate and orchestrate several other solutions from other vendors. You can consolidate those solutions all in one place, then maintain and monitor from that single point. This creates ease of use. It is a very powerful solution from this point of view."

"The downtimes feature is helpful. If the ISP is doing some maintenance on its network, we have the option to put downtime on the devices or the services, so we won't get any false alarms."

More Centreon pros

"Power Admin PA Server Monitor is super friendly and easy to use, very efficient, and powerful."

"The possibility to develop your own VB scripts."

"The satellite service installed on remote computers is an easy way to add clients, plus it's easy to deploy and to configure the licence is perpetual and not linked to one computer, so it's possible to remove a licence from one computer and use it on another with no extra cost"

Cons

"Centreon technical support is only available during Central European business hours. When it comes to critical business solutions, there should be a 24/7 hotline that customers can rely on."

"Centreon supports officially 10,000 services per poller. That is not much for larger customers, because this limit is reached very quickly. We use it with three times the limit without any problems, but Centreon says, "Okay, we are only supporting it with 10,000 services." We are aware that increasing the limit has different impacts because they need to support it. However, for most customers, it would be be very good if they could increase the limit of services."

"There are improvements that they need to make to their API. When we're using different systems and we want to disable monitoring for a specific server, we still can't do that through the API. That's something that's lacking."

"I think Centreon's security could be improved by leveraging AI. That's where things are heading in the industry."

"The reporting has room for improvement."

"There are times when we face issues with Centreon being in development mode. Sometimes we do not receive alerts, causing business impact, and users ask why no alerts were received."

"There is room for improvement in the area of artificial intelligence. The product gives us a lot of information, but it's only information. We want the product to do more auto-remediation."

"Where Centreon is weaker is that the initial deployment could be easier."

More Centreon cons

"Basic monitoring on Unix was working really well but it didn't really help under machines in Windows Domain Controller."

"The satellite service installation file could be separated from the server one. It would reduce the size of the file, and reduce the time to deploy on weak connections."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing starts at around 5000 euro. However, this depends on: Your environment, the size of your host, how many hosts you have, how many remote pollers you have, and if you want to use the Monitoring Business Intelligence or Centreon MAP functionalities."

"For more complex tasks, we use prepaid support days and ask Centreon to come onsite."

"The pricing works out well for us, given our environment and where we are."

"It's quite expensive when you use the Enterprise version, but if you compare it to other providers, it's more like a middle-of-the-line product. It's always good to have a price that is lower, but I would say the price is okay because we get very good support and if we have any other issues we can always contact them. There has never been a time when I didn't get help from them."

"Centreon is an open source product. Thus, there is no need for licensing."

"You purchase a package. You have a support contract (there is also a platinum support contract) and it is per module. That means you have to pay, e.g., for the MBI module or the BAM module. Or, if you want to save a lot of money, you can pay for IMP, which is the complete package."

"I think Centreon's pricing is fair, especially given the criticality of our system. They were cheaper than the other solutions. The licensing terms were pretty straightforward. I believe it was based on the number of hosts."

"The price is not too high. Licensing is driven by how many hosts you monitor, but because you can run the agentless version, you don't have to declare every host to Centreon, one at a time. That means you can drive your infrastructure supervision with a very low number of declared hosts."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Construction Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Power Admin PA Server Monitor?

My main use case for Power Admin PA Server Monitor is for enterprise server business usage. I use Power Admin PA Server Monitor in my daily work to track specific enterprise applications for busine...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Power Admin PA Server Monitor?

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

Zabbix vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 12% of the time

Nagios XI vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 11% of the time

Lenovo XClarity Controller vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

Avantra vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

More Power Admin PA Server Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

October 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

October 2026

Download Power Admin PA Server Monitor product report

Also Known As

No data available

PA Server Monitor

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

Power Admin PA Server Monitor offers a comprehensive approach to server and network monitoring, aimed at enhancing IT efficiency. Its features provide robust monitoring capabilities tailored for system administrators seeking to maintain and optimize server performance.

Power Admin PA Server Monitor is designed to streamline server management by providing detailed insights into system operations. It delivers functionalities that simplify the monitoring process, allowing IT professionals to identify and resolve issues efficiently. Its real-time alerting ensures timely reactions to potential issues, while reporting tools offer valuable data analysis, aiding in decision-making processes.

What are the key features?

Real-Time Alerts: Immediate notifications help prevent potential downtime.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed logs for performance monitoring and planning.
Remote Access: Manage servers from any location, increasing flexibility.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views to track critical metrics.
Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to growing requirements.

What benefits should users consider?

Efficiency: Streamlined operations save time and reduce manual tasks.
Cost Savings: Early detection of issues minimizes repair costs.
Reliability: Enhanced system stability increases uptime and trust.
Flexibility: Adaptable features cater to specific monitoring needs.

Power Admin PA Server Monitor is utilized across diverse industries, from healthcare to finance, where reliable server performance is crucial. Its customizable features support sector-specific requirements, ensuring seamless integration into existing IT infrastructures and delivering consistent performance monitoring tailored to industry demands.

Power Admin

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

Sauder Woodworking, Symantec, Microsoft, Skull Candy, NASA, Xerox, Chevron

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor

September 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.