Carbonite Server vs Microsoft DPM comparison

OpenText and Microsoft are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #58, while Microsoft is ranked #41 with an average rating of 7.8. OpenText holds a 1.0% mindshare in BRS, compared to Microsoft’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 73% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

3,673 Views
2,498 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft DPM

Read 21 Microsoft DPM reviews

3,696 Views
3,326 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

Microsoft DPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Microsoft DPM and Carbonite Server compete in the data protection space, each offering distinct strengths. Microsoft DPM has an advantage in pricing and support, while Carbonite Server offers superior functionality appealing to a broader audience.

Features:Microsoft DPM excels in disaster recovery, supporting SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint, and offers seamless Windows integration and reliable recovery options. Carbonite Server provides cross-platform capabilities, easy cloud integration, and continuous backup with fast recovery across environments.

Room for Improvement:Microsoft DPM could enhance features beyond Microsoft ecosystems, improve scalability for larger enterprises and expand support for non-Windows platforms. Carbonite Server can focus on simplifying its interface, enhance integration with Microsoft-centric environments, and offer more detailed reporting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Microsoft DPM offers easy deployment within Microsoft ecosystems with support aligned to Microsoft standards. Carbonite Server supports straightforward deployment across multiple operating systems with comprehensive professional setup services, beneficial for diverse IT infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI:Microsoft DPM, part of the System Center suite, provides value for Microsoft ecosystem users with lower initial costs when bundled. Carbonite Server offers flexible, feature-based pricing, often leading to a better perceived ROI across various platforms due to its extensive functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. Microsoft DPM Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. Microsoft DPM

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 903,807 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

58th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (45th)

Microsoft DPM

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

41st

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft DPM is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft DPM	0.9%
Carbonite Server	1.0%
Other	98.1%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Chris Puddy

Backup, storage and disaster recovery technical specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

A reliable backup product which needs little management

For most technical users the setup and initial deployment are fairly straightforward and once deployed it 99% of the time looks after itself. Installation of the agents is similar to most other products in that it has an install wizard to guide you, the accompanying documentation is also very useful to assist wherever you are in the agent install and policy setup process. Normally our customers' IT team does the deployment of agents, however, this isn't a daunting task unless you are dealing with multiple servers to protect the product. On a server-by-server basis, the deployment doesn't take long. From the MSP side of things, the infrastructure sitting behind the scenes doesn't take too much to install, configure and maintain.

Read full review

Nirukshitha Gamage

Senior Manager - System Infrastructure Software Support Team at DMS Electronics (Pvt) Ltd

User finds setup straightforward but seeks wider platform support and advanced features

Microsoft DPM could implement backup capabilities for third-party systems such as Linux. They also need to consider other features such as replication to DR sites, similar to what Veeam and other products offer. Microsoft DPM didn't have that capability at that time. If they want to remain competitive in the market, they need to observe the competition and implement improvements. The backup should have compression, deduplication, and DR replication. They should also improve monitoring of the environment. Microsoft DPM didn't have these basics at that time. If they had continued development on the products, they could have reached a higher level, especially given Microsoft's significant presence and majority of servers. Microsoft DPM didn't have any support structure in the backend. If they had a support structure, we could have escalated issues. I never received any support from Microsoft DPM.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

"This solution is very simple to use and I will recommend it to anybody."

"The advice that I have for people looking into using Carbonite Server is that it seems reliable and easy to use."

"The solution is very stable."

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

More Carbonite Server pros

"Microsoft DPM is scalable."

"Data Protection Manager provides data protection to your business system which covers every challenge posed by VMs migration."

"I like the core backup feature. I also like the file server backup feature. I find Microsoft DPM interesting because it has fantastic integration with Microsoft products. For example, in Exchange and SharePoint, DPM is excellent when it comes to backing up data. It also does a decent job with open-source products."

"I found Microsoft DPM pretty useful as it satisfied most of my requirements and seems to be fulfilling all the requirements for our backup strategy."

"The automated procedure is quite good for us, as it is able to capture all of the information that we require."

"The most valuable feature is the total integration of the System Center solution."

"Overall, I really like the product, it's very user-friendly, and I can do everything I need to do."

"I recommend Microsoft DPM as it is a cost-effective solution that works."

More Microsoft DPM pros

Cons

"The stability has room for improvement."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"When you have to restore it, Carbonite takes a lot of time."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"I would like to see an improvement on the management user interface, as well as Kellion integrations."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

More Carbonite Server cons

"It would be better if it integrated seamlessly with open source and competitor products. In the next release, I would like to see some data governance frameworks. It should have support features for data integration and data replication like Veeam. Right now, we are also using Veeam for certain scenarios."

"Microsoft DPM didn't have any support structure in the backend. If they had a support structure, we could have escalated issues. I never received any support from Microsoft DPM."

"Microsoft DPM could improve by adding S3 backup to S3 storage capabilities."

"They could improve the compatibility and integration with other products and the ability to do file-to file backups of other products."

"Management reporting could be improved."

"The data tagging feature needs improvement. The solution could be a bit more intuitive in certain aspects."

"I would say the user-friendliness could be improved because I have found that my colleagues are not finding it very easy to use."

"The real hands-on experience with DPM is that it's difficult to set up unless you get it right first time, the agent processes gobble CPU and i/o, and if you're unfortunate enough for your DPM primary to go awol, you're faced with building a complete DPM network again because the secondary/ies will refuse full backups if the primary isn't there."

More Microsoft DPM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"The solution is open source."

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"Its price is reasonable."

"Microsoft DPM is a free solution. However, we pay approximately $3,000 annually for support."

"Microsoft DPM can be considered as an expensive solution for smaller or medium enterprises, but we have been satisfied with the price structure as it is fixed and it offers a variety of useful features"

"I think Microsoft DPM pricing is reasonable. The additional costs are related to storage and technical support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

903,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft DPM?

The pricing of Microsoft solutions rates in the middle range at five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft DPM?

Microsoft DPM could improve by adding S3 backup to S3 storage capabilities. AI integration is not necessary for backups as this is not a security solution.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft DPM?

We use Microsoft DPM for backup servers. ManageEngine is used to manage workstations and servers, and Operation Manager is used for monitoring.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

Carbonite Safe Backup vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Data Protector vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 4% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 4% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 3% of the time

Catalogic DPX vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft DPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

June 2026

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft DPM

June 2026

Download Microsoft DPM product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

DPM, Data Protection Manager, MS DPM

Overview

Carbonite Server offers robust disaster recovery and data protection, with efficient features for restoring and managing complex server environments.

With capabilities like Bare Metal Recovery and SQL granular restore, Carbonite Server supports AIX and AS/400 Series, making it versatile for different platforms. Its efficient replication and failover processes are particularly beneficial for maintaining business continuity. Users appreciate the straightforward setup, responsive technical support, and automatic updates. There is room for improvement in areas such as instant recovery, more granular user permissions, and enhanced cloud integration. Managed service providers find it useful for offering reliable cloud and on-premises backup solutions.

What are the key features of Carbonite Server?

Bare Metal Recovery: Simplifies full system recovery with minimal user intervention.
SQL Granular Restore: Enhances precision in database recovery operations.
Platform Support: Compatible with AIX, AS/400, VMware, vSphere, and vSAN.
Efficient Replication: Facilitates swift disaster recovery and data transfer.
Automatic Updates: Ensures current software status with less manual effort.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Disaster Recovery: Quick recovery processes improve business resilience.
Easy Verification: Simplifies compliance and data integrity checks.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes system resource usage, enhancing performance.
Reliable Support: Access to responsive technical support mitigates downtime.
Data Protection: Comprehensive solutions for cloud backups and data security.

Industries leveraging Carbonite Server enjoy its ability to support cloud backups, off-site data protection, and complex server restoration, especially in virtualized environments. It is widely used by managed service providers to deliver backup services and ensure application consistency in data transfers.

OpenText

Microsoft DPM is a comprehensive backup and recovery software that integrates seamlessly with Microsoft applications, providing efficient recovery capabilities and ensuring compatibility across workloads.

Microsoft's Data Protection Manager offers significant integration capabilities with Microsoft applications and Azure Active Directory for Single Sign-On, enhancing scalability through integration with System Center. It supports streamlined backup solutions for both physical and virtual Microsoft environments, with automated operations and a user-friendly interface. While DPM showcases robust file search capabilities, time-saving functionalities, and enhanced security measures, improvements are needed in third-party integrations, backup for external devices, and affordable cloud storage options. Enterprises might face challenges due to complex configurations and limited user-community support.

What are the key features of Microsoft DPM?

Seamless integration with Microsoft Apps: Provides straightforward integration for enhanced operational efficiency.
Efficient Recovery Capabilities: Enables quick data restoration to minimize downtime.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Facilitates Single Sign-On for easier access control.
Compatibility with System Center: Enhances scalability and management efficiency.
Automated Operations: Streamlines backup processes, reducing manual effort.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Strong file search capabilities contribute to data protection.
Time-Saving: Quick recovery processes improve operational efficiency.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies backup management for IT teams.

In industries such as consulting, local government, and data centers, Microsoft DPM plays a critical role in managing backup and recovery operations. Organizations rely on it to safeguard environments, including ERP systems and virtual machines, by supporting daily, weekly, and incremental backups, disaster recovery, and data replication across physical Windows Servers, Hyper-V Servers, SharePoint, and more.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

Medical Park, Centropol Energy, a.s., NCFE, D & H Distributing, Metalor, Colosseum, a.s., Sanitas S.A., Icebreaker

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. Microsoft DPM

June 2026

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. Microsoft DPM

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. Microsoft DPM and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

903,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. Microsoft DPM report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.