Camunda vs QPR ProcessDesigner comparison

Camunda and QPR Software are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while QPR Software is ranked #25. Camunda holds a 12.5% mindshare in BPD, compared to QPR Software’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of QPR Software users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 77 Camunda reviews

7,546 Views
5,128 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

QPR ProcessDesigner

Read 2 QPR ProcessDesigner reviews

196 Views
135 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

QPR ProcessDesigner

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

QPR ProcessDesigner and Camunda are competing products in process management and orchestration. Camunda has an advantage due to its advanced features and developer-friendly tools, while QPR ProcessDesigner offers better support services for immediate customer assistance.

Features: QPR ProcessDesigner is known for its visualization capabilities, integration options, and tools for modeling, analyzing, and enhancing processes. Camunda offers robust automation and scalability with BPMN support, extensible APIs, and a comprehensive feature set.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QPR ProcessDesigner is appreciated for its easy deployment and comprehensive support, appealing to businesses requiring quick implementation. Camunda allows for flexible deployment in complex environments but may require more technical expertise, making QPR more attractive for those needing ongoing assistance.

Pricing and ROI: QPR ProcessDesigner provides a predictable pricing model with lower initial setup costs, benefiting budget-conscious organizations. Camunda's setup costs may be higher, but its features support significant ROI for companies focused on long-term automation and customization, making it ideal for scalable solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. QPR ProcessDesigner Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. QPR ProcessDesigner

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Design

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (1st), Process Automation (1st)

QPR ProcessDesigner

Ranking in Business Process Design

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Camunda is 12.5%, up from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QPR ProcessDesigner is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling

There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.

Read full review

it_user211722

Solution Architect at Vodafone New Zealand

FactView was easy to use and integrate.

Process simulation Performance monitoring Business intelligence I was a consultant mainly at Standard Bank, I worked for the supplier of the QPR Suite. It was used mainly for balanced scorecard to track organisation performance, but also for process mapping and monitoring as part of their Six…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable."

"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly."

"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."

"The BPMN diagram is valuable. For our use case of transferring money from one account to another, the connections have to be done in the traditional financial ways. There are a lot of unexpected errors and a lot of instability with this kind of system, and we are using Camunda in order to have clear flows. With BPMN, I can show a flow to my business partner, and the business team can easily understand what's going on. The technical team can understand what the implementation is, and we can model different errors and the process for recovering from these errors."

"On a scale of one to ten, I rate ECS a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."

"The most valuable features are that it's lightweight, can be embedded in existing Java code, and keeps track of the workflow state and the instances that we need."

"The platform's approach to BPMN modeling is straightforward and versatile, making it easy to adopt and use effectively."

More Camunda pros

"Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."

"It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."

Cons

"I would like to see better pricing."

"There are a few things that I'm missing. For instance, the user interface creator, which I know other systems have, like Aurea or Lombardi, which are IBM solutions. The interface creator, including the data model creator or some module which would allow the users who are not programmers or business consultants and who are not technically skilled in database and Java programming, to create data models and user interfaces."

"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."

"The initial setup can be complex for business users."

"The deployment model could be improved for easier implementation."

"I think that Camunda can try to do better when it comes to solving the complexities of all the products in its software stack."

"Lacking in forms visualization."

"When building interfaces, there are limited tools to work with, especially when dealing with different types of tasks, such as user tasks and system tasks."

More Camunda cons

"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I tried to get some information about buying the license for the solution, but I found it kind of hard to understand the business model."

"The most attractive feature of the product is that it is open source."

"Camunda is a cheaply priced product, making it one of its major USPs."

"We're using the free version. We used the Enterprise version for some time. If I compare free versus what we paid at that time, the Enterprise version costs a lot. For the additional functionality that we got with the Enterprise version, it was too costly."

"We pay for the license of this solution annually."

"We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."

"We are using the community version. There is no licensing cost."

"There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 10% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QPR ProcessDesigner

Compared 51% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs QPR ProcessDesigner

Compared 49% of the time

More QPR ProcessDesigner Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

April 2025

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

April 2025

Download QPR ProcessDesigner product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

ProcessGuide, QPR Software ProcessGuide

Overview

Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

Camunda

Describe, analyze, communicate and improve your processes with QPR ProcessGuide, an all-inclusive multiuser process management software. QPR ProcessGuide helps your organization in their EBPA/BPA work by taking into consideration the needs of business users as well as IT experts.

QPR Software

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

ALPLA

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. QPR ProcessDesigner

April 2025

Free Report: Camunda vs. QPR ProcessDesigner

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. QPR ProcessDesigner and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. QPR ProcessDesigner report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.