Camunda vs QPR ProcessDesigner comparison

Camunda and QPR Software are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Camunda is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4, while QPR Software is ranked #26. Camunda holds a 12.3% mindshare in BPD, compared to QPR Software’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of QPR Software users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 77 Camunda reviews

23,608 Views
6,374 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

QPR ProcessDesigner

Read 2 QPR ProcessDesigner reviews

236 Views
234 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

QPR ProcessDesigner

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

QPR ProcessDesigner and Camunda are competing products in process management and orchestration. Camunda has an advantage due to its advanced features and developer-friendly tools, while QPR ProcessDesigner offers better support services for immediate customer assistance.

Features: QPR ProcessDesigner is known for its visualization capabilities, integration options, and tools for modeling, analyzing, and enhancing processes. Camunda offers robust automation and scalability with BPMN support, extensible APIs, and a comprehensive feature set.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QPR ProcessDesigner is appreciated for its easy deployment and comprehensive support, appealing to businesses requiring quick implementation. Camunda allows for flexible deployment in complex environments but may require more technical expertise, making QPR more attractive for those needing ongoing assistance.

Pricing and ROI: QPR ProcessDesigner provides a predictable pricing model with lower initial setup costs, benefiting budget-conscious organizations. Camunda's setup costs may be higher, but its features support significant ROI for companies focused on long-term automation and customization, making it ideal for scalable solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. QPR ProcessDesigner Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. QPR ProcessDesigner

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Design

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (1st), Process Automation (1st)

QPR ProcessDesigner

Ranking in Business Process Design

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Camunda is 12.3%, up from 11.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QPR ProcessDesigner is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling

There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.

Read full review

it_user794370

‎Senior Advisor with 1-10 employees

It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes

BPM/BPI activities in various business areas. This has been particularly useful in end user workshops where people are able to see and comment on actual process model immediately. This focuses communication and makes it easier to avoid misunderstandings Processes become clearer, easier to…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."

"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."

"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."

"We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation."

"The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."

"I like everything about the entire BPM that comes with the BPM suite."

"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."

"The graphical interface is very beneficial."

More Camunda pros

"It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."

"Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."

Cons

"The business model could be easier to understand."

"It has a Postgres database at the backend, and it is very difficult to scale if you increase the number of processes running. We did hit some barriers. We were able to overcome them, but it was a problem. Camunda has another product called Camunda Cloud, which supposedly doesn't have the same scalability problems, but we are not using Camunda Cloud because the set of features is smaller than Camunda On-Premises. So, its scalability can be improved. Because it has a single database, it is more difficult to scale if you have a huge success."

"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."

"There should be a multi-tenant solution for the platform where it supports multiple organizations on one platform instead of having to spin up multiple clusters for each organization. There should be an easy way to integrate different departments into one platform without having to operate multiple platforms. The operations should be easier with the enterprise solution. It should not create more overhead for the operations people."

"The support offered by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners."

"We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved."

"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."

More Camunda cons

"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cheaper licensing and resources than competitors"

"When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition."

"We pay for the license of this solution annually."

"We have an annual subscription to this solution."

"We are using the paid edition because there is no separate support and service license yet. We are yet to find a suitable licensing model for Camunda because we only use the engine, and we have implemented our solution around Camunda Cloud. So, we are mainly interested in the support and service, and that's what we mainly use in the paid edition."

"Camunda is much cheaper."

"Generally, the price could be better, as well as the licensing fees."

"I tried to get some information about buying the license for the solution, but I found it kind of hard to understand the business model."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QPR ProcessDesigner

Compared 35% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs QPR ProcessDesigner

Compared 25% of the time

ARIS BPA vs QPR ProcessDesigner

Compared 22% of the time

Bonita vs QPR ProcessDesigner

Compared 18% of the time

More QPR ProcessDesigner Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

August 2025

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

July 2025

Download QPR ProcessDesigner product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

ProcessGuide, QPR Software ProcessGuide

Interactive Demo

Camunda

Demo not available

QPR Software

Overview

Camunda drives business process automation and AI orchestration, enhancing efficiency and innovation without compromising security and governance. Trusted by major brands like Atlassian, it seamlessly integrates systems and human tasks for impactful digital transformation.

Camunda is renowned for fostering collaboration between business and IT, empowering over 700 organizations across diverse sectors to manage and improve business-critical processes. With its flexible architecture, Camunda supports BPMN, CMMN, and DMN standards, allowing for efficient modeling and smooth integration with environments via REST APIs. This open-source platform offers extensive customization and combines enterprise features such as process history tracking and decision table editing, supporting both technical and non-technical users in achieving efficient automation strategies. While performance and scalability issues exist, especially in the cloud, Camunda remains a top choice for companies like ING and Vodafone.

What are Camunda's standout features?

Lightweight, scalable architecture: Facilitates smooth business process automation.
BPMN, CMMN, DMN support: Ensures comprehensive process modeling capabilities.
REST API integration: Enables seamless connectivity with different environments.
Open-source customization: Offers flexibility for adapting to specific needs.
Enterprise features: Includes process history, graphical modifications, and decision table editing.

What benefits can users expect from Camunda?

Increased efficiency: Streamlined automation processes boost productivity.
Collaboration: Facilitates synergy between IT and business teams.
Competitive advantage: Enables organizations to stay ahead through innovation.
Customization: Adapts to precise business process requirements.
Scalability: Expands with organizational growth demands.

In sectors like banking and government, Camunda's fast prototyping and workflow automation capabilities optimize processes such as client onboarding and investment banking workflows. It enhances social governance tasks, credit flows, and enterprise integration, while also being used in insurance and telecom for automating repetitive tasks and improving efficiency. Organizations utilize Camunda for training and service management, showcasing its versatility across industries.

Camunda

Describe, analyze, communicate and improve your processes with QPR ProcessGuide, an all-inclusive multiuser process management software. QPR ProcessGuide helps your organization in their EBPA/BPA work by taking into consideration the needs of business users as well as IT experts.

QPR Software

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

ALPLA

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. QPR ProcessDesigner

July 2025

Free Report: Camunda vs. QPR ProcessDesigner

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. QPR ProcessDesigner and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. QPR ProcessDesigner report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.